881
submitted 14 hours ago by toaster@slrpnk.net to c/funny@sh.itjust.works
top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] commander@lemmy.world 7 points 59 minutes ago

As unhinged as social media gets, this is pretty much why so many end up trusting it over traditional media. The internet broke the veil of commercial reporting/journalism - media in general. Broke the trust on accepting public personas and not being suspicious of them behind the scenes. Sell out reporters/journalist/artists/etc are like scabs to labor strikers

[-] SCmSTR 8 points 1 hour ago

And this is why legacy media is legacy media.

[-] plz1@lemmy.world 38 points 3 hours ago

She was trying to do a fluff piece interview, and he was trying to drop hard facts. I'm glad he didn't back down on his points.

[-] orbitz@lemmy.ca 15 points 3 hours ago

Haven't watched it but sounds like someone with strong convictions and an idea why things are the way they are. Hopefully eventually enough people recognize the fact that we need a functional society that allows the random person to feel comfortable. Cause if you get enough itchy people things get scratched.

[-] manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml 3 points 36 minutes ago

Haven’t watched it

It's a 30 second clip mate

[-] PuddleOfKittens@sh.itjust.works 3 points 32 minutes ago

30 seconds of sound when you're pooping on the toilet at work, is 30 seconds too much sound. Hypothetically speaking.

[-] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 22 points 3 hours ago

She pulled back the microphone mid sentence when he refused to let the conversation get derailed.

Very sus

This guy is my hero

[-] laranis@lemmy.zip 66 points 7 hours ago

Crazy how fast she pulled back on that. Like she has been trained to not allow that sort of talk. It was almost instant.

[-] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 23 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

From to in an instant!

[-] Smeagol666@crazypeople.online 13 points 6 hours ago

A dog watching another dog bote the hand that feeds her.

[-] bagsy@lemmy.world 84 points 8 hours ago

It really makes you wonder how these reporters are trained. What else can they not talk about on air?

[-] guyoverthere123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 7 hours ago

Anything that goes against the values of Sinclair or NexStar would be off the table.

[-] Tm12@lemmy.ca 15 points 5 hours ago

So general common sense like fuck ICE and free Palestine?

[-] thlibos@thelemmy.club 20 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

She knows exactly what she is doing. She probably wouldn't even get into any trouble if she had let the guy go on for a bit since it is just a random, live interview. Doesn't matter, though, as boot-fellating, spittle-licking toadies will instantly and hungrily provide cover for the owner class. There will always be a critical mass of just about every demographic (even those you would not expect it from) who will be willing to sell out for that payday. If she doesn't try to silence or steamroll any even remotely anti-greed rhetoric she might be passed over for that next promotion.

Shout out to Washington Heights. I used to live at Fort Washington and 181st. I miss it.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 42 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

If the fediverse can focus on integrating content from from other fediverse sources extremely organically, the fediverse will win. I shouldn't have to leave Lemmy to watch this video.

[-] justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 8 hours ago

You need to leave? I could just watch it on the timeline. Using jerboa, I guess it depends on client.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago

Ok web, its embedded. On mobile, I have to hop out.

[-] aka@slrpnk.net 13 points 8 hours ago

It's embedded for me ¯⁠\⁠_⁠(⁠ツ⁠)⁠_⁠/⁠¯

[-] ptu@sopuli.xyz 3 points 8 hours ago

Are there some federated video sites? Most of the video results in duckduckgo are hosted by the tech giants, would be cool if there was some alternatives

[-] night_petal@piefed.social 7 points 7 hours ago

PeerTube is the biggest player for fediverse video as far as I know. There is also Loops, which is where this video is hosted.

[-] chortle_tortle@mander.xyz 3 points 8 hours ago

Did you have to leave on .world? I didn't have to on my instance, but I don't know exactly how all that works.

In this case I'd say it's especially good for the sake of loops rather than lemmy. Loops is quite a small platform, and looking at it now, this post has 23 likes and 2 comments. But two posts I've seen on lemmy, totaling ~800 upvotes and ~45 comments.

Seems like pulling that info into loops would make it all feel much more lively, though I'm sure this isn't insight to the already busy loops creator!

[-] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 27 points 8 hours ago

They better never interview me on live TV. Ill be asking the reporter where they will be hiding when the revolution comes.

https://youtu.be/IwvrGHsjD7g

[-] BillyClark@piefed.social 198 points 13 hours ago

The news reporter wanted a feel good puff piece regardless of how inappropriate it is. The interviewee wanted to report the actual news.

[-] guyoverthere123@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 7 hours ago

The company that owns that NBC affiliate wanted a feel good puff piece. I doubt she had a say in the matter.

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 15 points 6 hours ago

Yeah, she's just following orders.

[-] xSikes@feddit.online 8 points 8 hours ago

But it wasn’t inappropriate…

[-] BeardededSquidward 17 points 8 hours ago

To the holding company it is.

[-] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

A misunderstanding on your part I thinks. I believe they are saying it was inappropriate to attempt to sanitize reality so they could release a "feel good puff piece".

[-] AtHeartEngineer@lemmy.world 82 points 12 hours ago

lol I love that guy, he definitely like "oh ya, it's my time, I'm over this shit, but I'll be polite about it"

[-] Sundiata@lemmy.world 24 points 9 hours ago

she smiles like the woman from ba sing se,

the back in the 90s part screams body language of desperation to signal to him to play along and say what she wants him to say.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 158 points 14 hours ago

To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.

[-] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 hours ago

Didn't a literal Nazi coin that phrase while talking about jews?

[-] Catoblepas@piefed.blahaj.zone 40 points 11 hours ago

I knew it was the kids with cancer all along!

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Yeah! Those little brats have had it too easy for too long!

Well not that long EACH, but you know 🤷

[-] Lupus@feddit.org 75 points 13 hours ago

Careful with that quote, it's by Kevin Alfred Strom a Neo-Nazi from an 1993 essay in the national Vanguard, a white nationalist publication and it refers to the antisemitic trope of world Judaism.

I'm not criticizing you, just want to contextualize it because it could be misconstrued to be a antisemitic dog-whistle, especially in the context of the linked article.

[-] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 39 points 13 hours ago

It's an axiomatic truism. It's logic is self contained.

To learn who is wet, simply find out who is in the water.

[-] thesmokingman@programming.dev 2 points 4 hours ago

Why does that preclude it from being in the zeitgeist?

[-] QueenHawlSera@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

Because it's literally a white supremacist talking point?

[-] thesmokingman@programming.dev 2 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

You and I are in agreement; the user I responded to seemed to be implying otherwise.

Edit: I think it’s a bit strong to say it’s “a literal white supremacist talking point.” Your average boomer is going to mistakenly associate it with Voltaire. I think folks that are some level below terminally online have seen one of the many pieces pointing out its origin. Away from the author, it could stand on its own merits which is why “kids with cancer” is a funny response to it. In the US, at least, I haven’t seen a lot of discussion from the white supremacists who run the government on this quote which further makes me question if it’s a literal talking point. Perhaps you are aware of groups that are actively pushing it? If not, it’s a bit more reasonable to say what the first response in this thread said. Be careful.

[-] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

the user I responded to seemed to be implying otherwise.

Not really. I'm just saying the quote isn't particularly insightful upon analysis, source notwithstanding.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 11 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Logic self contained within nature's perfect geometry, a circle.

[-] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 8 points 12 hours ago

Well, that just means he has experience ruling over people, and not allowing them to criticize him.

That means it's valid.

[-] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 7 hours ago
[-] webdoodle@lemmy.ml 23 points 13 hours ago

Operation Mockingbird 2.0 - Totalitarian Domination by controlling the narrative.

this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2026
881 points (100.0% liked)

Funny

13931 readers
1431 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS