843

If you’re anything like my parents, you probably wouldn’t even understand most of the content that floods my social media, no matter how hard I try to avoid it.

Here’s a recent example from Instagram: “Do y’all females ever tell ur homegirls ‘Sis chill you letting too many dudes hit?’” Essentially, that means: “Women – do you ever tell your girlfriends that they’re whores and need to stop letting so many guys fuck them?” The reel, posted by a 19-year-old man, appeared on my Instagram feed without me wanting to see it, or ever interacting with any other similar content. The comments that followed were pure misogyny. “Women see body count as a leaderboard and they try to outdo each other,” was one of them. Translation: all women are competitively promiscuous.

Consider the use of the word “female” in these posts. It is not a neutral term here, it is a term of abuse. It’s used by teenage boys to degrade us and equate us to animals. Boys are never described as “males”, but girls are always “females” – the equivalent of sows or calves, creatures that are less than human. We’re also “thots” (whores), “community pussy” and “bops”. “Bop” stands for “been over passed” and is a derogatory term used by boys to refer to a girl they’ve decided has been “passed around” or had too much sex. Sexual equality has ceased to exist online. It’s absolutely fine for boys to have sex, but when girls do, they are called worthless and referred to as objects. “When community pussy tries to insult me, I just want to beat that bitch up.” That’s a message I saw on TikTok.

I’m a 15-year-old schoolgirl and like most teenagers I spend a fair portion of my spare time on social media, often scrolling through short-form videos on apps such as Instagram or TikTok. All of my friends use those apps, and many spend multiple hours a day on them. I actively try to avoid online misogyny, but I am met with it incessantly whenever I open my mainstream social media apps. It only takes a few minutes before there’s subtle or overt misogyny, such as comment sections on a girl’s post filled with remarks about her body, videos made by men or boys captioned with a degrading joke, and even topics such as domestic violence or rape, trivialised and laughed about.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 hours ago

This isn't social media, it's social acid, dissolving and corroding everything.

[-] resume7512@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago

Imagine if TikTok automatically tagged all content with #misogyny, #racism, #sexism and so on. And then published monthly reports on society trends. Like "In Feb 2026 racism went down 12%, misogyny went up 5%". I think it would be incredibly insightful and helpful.

While article tries to promote social media ban for under 16s, I strongly believe its just a way to sweep the problem under the rug. I think much more reasonable approach is to recognize those trends and deal with them through education and better parenting.

[-] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 51 points 20 hours ago

Let me guess the solution before reading the article - some form of weakening to digital privacy.

Yep: "A social media ban for under-16s might prevent young boys seeing endless content that treats women with contempt and hate. Boys at this age are very susceptible to the cool and funny framing of what is, in reality, relentless misogyny. A ban might not fix the problem, but it would help. If society can’t stop it, it can show it disapproves."

Essentially, this article is an argument to introduce online ID, and I disagree with that on a fundamental level.

The soil misogyny has dug it's roots into is the iniquity we created while seeking equity. It was done for the best of reasons, but now we see the price. That's not a problem we can solve easily, and certainly not via creating state spying infrastructure.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 13 points 17 hours ago

We have mostly 50-80 year old Republicans pushing to strip women of rights and somehow misogyny is all the internets fault? This is a deep societal problem that can't be fixed by internet law.

[-] BeardededSquidward 2 points 14 hours ago

The internet just lets the terrible people be terrible with some anonymity in doing so. It allows the rancid to hang their butts out for all to see without facing societal consequences. In short, it's a megaphone for the problems we have.

[-] Virtvirt588@lemmy.world 11 points 19 hours ago

Word it like that, the guardian has some pretty authoritarian leaning shit.

The main pieces of the article don't read like fabricated and are possibly genuine; however, the last part about the ban might be an deliberate attempt to manipulate the reader using emotional baggage after reading the main section. It may aswell be injected there by the Guardian, and its probable the author didn't even think about the bans.

This yet again is ageism in a nutshell. The Guardian has completely invalidated the authors claims, just because they are a minor. This is where humanity is going: misogyny, ageism, and deliberate injection of stories with malicious intent.

[-] TronBronson@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

We used Fox News to enrage parents who raised kids to be misogynists and racists. We must ban the internet!

[-] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 21 points 18 hours ago

If anyone uses the word "female" to refer to women/girls, they instantly disqualify themselves from any right to be taken serious. Those people need a psychotherapist.

[-] teuniac_@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago

I think it depends a bit on how multicultural an environment is. In a lot of places (including here), for plenty of people English isn't their first language. I have seen 'Female' used on bathroom signs several times. The focus should be on intention, not language.

[-] bold_omi@lemmy.today 12 points 16 hours ago

I would note that this is not necessarily true. When referring to sex rather than gender, it is common—and when used in the context "male or female," etc. It's not an evil word—some people just misuse it. It is similar to "it" which is not a bad word in any way, but if you call someone "it" they will likely be offended.

Use of the word female does not indicate misogyny. Deliberate objectification of women through such a consistent word choice is different.

[-] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

Common sense applies, obviously.

[-] Clbull@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

Might want to cancel Strong Bad then...

[-] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip 14 points 19 hours ago

If you’re anything like my parents, you probably wouldn’t even understand most of the content that floods my social media

Aren't her parents like 35 or 40? She thinks people who are 40 don't understand social media? LMAO

[-] stardreamer 6 points 18 hours ago

They don't. Undeniably the social media landscape has changed, especially for younger folks. It's no longer people spamming chatrooms, starting flamewars, or calling random names in a CoD/PlayOnline lobby. Things are more targeted now. You can easily look up information (especially someone who is ill prepared to protect it) and make much more personal attacks. The old mudslinging used to slide right off since it was just generic provocative comments. Besides, the worst thing that could happen is you have to change your irc nick. But what happens when your school Gmail gets leaked, that is also what you use to sign in to various services?

[-] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip 4 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

The boxxy 4chan civil war happened before this girl was even born, there was doxxing, calls to her house, I don't recall if even swatting.

[-] stardreamer 2 points 14 hours ago

Yes. But the chances of harassment went from accidentally provoking someone on 4ch (approximately the probability of getting hit by a flying brick while walking down the street) to looking at your classmate a bit funny. There's too much personal information out there. You no longer need a shovel to dig up dirt.

[-] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 hours ago

I'm not disagreeing that it increased exponentially, but because something happens more often to more people doesn't make it incomprehensible for people in their mid 30's early 40's

[-] TronBronson@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

Idk sounds like internet bullying to me. It’s not new. It’s not evolved. It requires the same basic knowledge and precautions.. it involves vigilant parents and an involved school system. We didn’t solve bullying we embraced it. It’s not different, it’s all encompassing now.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Tarkcanis@lemmy.world 39 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I was gonna say unpopular opinion, but maybe not...

disengage from social media. It is not reality. not only that, but it perpetuates itself, and the oligarchy that created it. Go out and meet people in the real world. This is comming from an autistic person with minimal patients for other people. Seriously, ditch social media; it's poison, and when it dies (which it will if people like you leave) these toxic peope you encounter will have to face the real world.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] peacefulpixel@lemmy.world 22 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

i suppose it shouldn't be surprising but these comments sure are proving the articles point. i guess blaming the people being oppressed is a lot easier than blaming or even actually acknowledging the systemic oppression when you're a brickheaded fascist, especially when you're unaffected by/benefiting from it

[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 76 points 1 day ago

Delete TikTok and Instagram for starters.

[-] KaChilde@sh.itjust.works 46 points 1 day ago

This is simple advice for an adult who isn’t mired in the drama of high school. For most teens, these apps are how they socialise, how they share information and learn what is cool or uncool. Deleting the apps means you have cut yourself off from the social system and have made yourself a social pariah.

An equivalent for the millennials and gen Xers would be not having Facebook as a teen. It meant not being invited to parties because Facebook was the only platform people used to plan events. No one was going to seek you out individually because it was assumed you were on Facebook and would see the updates.

I agree that social media is harming all of us, but telling teens to just not use it ignores what it was like to be a teenager.

[-] redwattlebird@lemmings.world 5 points 21 hours ago

As a Xennial, I still don't get it because, I guess, I embraced being the weirdo at school and hung out with the weirdos. I was bullied for wearing secondhand uniforms, not wearing doc martens, not having the backpack that everyone has, never having a bf, not talking l33t etc, etc...

I say, take that fall. Embrace destruction and delete the apps. Be the weird analogue kid.

But then again, maybe Australian kids weren't massive arseholes.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Ascendor@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 21 hours ago

I am really sorry that you have to live through this. I (middle-aged, white, cishet, more or less wealthy male) know that I'm super priviledged - yet reading posts like that show me that I will never be able to fully feel what you girls/women have to live through. I promise that I will fight against misogyny whereever I can.

And thank you for your post, there are really phrases that I wouldn't have understood.

[-] Landslide7648@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 19 hours ago

That‘s the text of the article. I highly doubt op is a 15 year old girl

[-] Ascendor@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 14 hours ago

Oh wow, my reading competency is at max :-D Thanks.

[-] vithigar@lemmy.ca 40 points 1 day ago

Sexual equality has ceased to exist online. It’s absolutely fine for boys to have sex, but when girls do, they are called worthless and referred to as objects.

This isn't new. I'm a man in my mid 40s and the disparity between how promiscuous men are viewed as compared to promiscuous women has existed for as long as I've been sexually aware, and well before.

Obviously that doesn't make it okay. I also have no idea what the solution might be. There have been a few cultural efforts to normalize the idea of women enjoying and seeking out sex but none of them seem to really reach the people that need to hear it.

I do find it oddly paradoxical that men who make it very clear that they are actively seeking sexual partners would disparage women for being sexually active.

[-] Soggy@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

I do find it oddly paradoxical that men who make it very clear that they are actively seeking sexual partners would disparage women for being sexually active.

They don't want experienced, knowledgable, self-confident partners. They want naive young women they can gaslight and abuse.

[-] DylanMc6@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 19 hours ago

Social media is run by rich snobs. Time to organize.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] super_user_do@feddit.it 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I just don't believe all of this is real anymore. It's a fucking psyop! Men and women have different kinds of comments under posts. If a woman looks at the comments of Reel where a woman promotes the most depraved, objectifying a degrading things to do to guys with the sole purpose of making them suffer, they will only see comments of other women (rightfully) blasting OP in the comments. But when a guy opens the same comment section he will 99% see only comments of women encouraging other women to be the most evil things humanly possible.

It is not a conspiracy, it's a really effective way to farm engagement for basically free. We are letting them take control over society with the most obvious divide-et-impera tactics ever applied in human history

[-] utopiah@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago

a fucking psyop ... It is not a conspiracy, it’s a really effective way to farm engagement for basically free.

Right, I think there is very few people actively trying to rage bait others. Sure there are some trolls but the problem at scale is rather blind metrics. There are instead very number smart people, PhDs in machine learning, economics, etc who are brilliant at tweaking mechanisms in order to make a number, e.g. engagement, keep on going up. They might take a benign example, e.g a cooking recipe, and split the audience between more critical vs more positive. They noticed that indeed when they do so, when they artificially create affinity groups, people do reply/like/etc more. They then generalize that technique to other features (e.g. gender, age, etc), run it again at scale, show their project manager that indeed engagement increases and they get a promotion. They have literally no idea of the damage they make, they might in fact actively do their best to ignore the negative side effect.

Number goes up, users get depressed, profit is what matters in this inhumane medium.

[-] exaybachae@startrek.website 4 points 20 hours ago

I'd be interested to know if that's true.

I've seen plenty of both misandry and misogyny.

I've only seen misandry so far on this thread.

It would be pretty upsetting if who saw what was deliberate in order to manipulate the viewers.

[-] OpenStars@piefed.social 256 points 1 day ago

Don't use Instagram or TikTok ✅👍

Enragebait is a well known consequence of using a profit-driven Algorithm, i.e. enshittification.

15-year-olds are not being specifically targeted so much as caught up in the phenomena occuring overall.

load more comments (30 replies)
[-] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Getting glad I never tried out Instagram. I can see where these 'ban social media' people are coming from if these are the platforms they're looking at, I've never seen anything nearly as bad on the platforms I use (and a most of the bad stuff I see is heavily downvoted and argued against anyways). I guess if I went to r/conservative or started watching Asmongold videos on Youtube or something I would probably see some pretty terrible stuff, but Reddit and Youtube both keep me pretty separated from their bad sides.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 120 points 1 day ago

The age verification debate misses the real point. These commercial algorithms are harmful for everybody.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
843 points (100.0% liked)

World News

54116 readers
2159 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS