Palestine Action defendants acquitted of aggravated burglary over arms factory raid (www.middleeasteye.net)

submitted 2 weeks ago by pete_link@lemmy.ml to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/42709668

4 February 2026 12:40 GMT

During the trial, the prosecution alleged that the six defendants entered the factory with sledgehammers, intending, if needed, to injure and incapacitate security guards.

But the defendants disputed that the sledgehammers were “weapons of offence”, and insisted they were intended only to damage property.

As the verdicts were being read, the defendants held hands and embraced in the dock, as families and supporters cheered and wept.

The six defendants have been held for around 18 months on remand- exceeding standard UK custodial time limits.

all 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] jimmy90@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

still on the hook for loads of other stuff

[-] BigTwerp@feddit.uk 3 points 2 weeks ago

Any update on the health of the woman they attacked with a sledgehammer?

It would be good to see justice for her at least.

[-] crapwittyname@feddit.uk 18 points 2 weeks ago

It's in the article there:

jurors did not return a verdict on the charge faced by Corner of grievous bodily harm with intent for striking a police officer with a sledgehammer.

Here's another interesting bit:

Bodycam footage presented to the jury appeared to show security guard Angelo Volante allegedly striking defendant Devlin in the neck with a sledgehammer, knocking him to the ground.

A series of images and a body map detailing Devlin’s injuries, including a black eye, was presented to the jury.

In another clip, Volante is seen brandishing a whip and running towards Devlin, who was unarmed. He then picked up a sledgehammer and swung it at Devlin and co-defendant Rogers.

Let's hope there's some justice for the protesters, eh?

[-] BigTwerp@feddit.uk 2 points 2 weeks ago

I would hope the guard is also subject to a rigorous investigation and charged if an offence has been committed.

[-] crapwittyname@feddit.uk 7 points 2 weeks ago

Well if they have, then the prosecution in that case certainly haven't been as energetic in propagandising the violence as the prosecution for the crown.

You seem to be someone who has faith in institutions. Do you not think justice has been done? The jury saw the same video you did and didn't believe it to be GBH with intent. So the officer who was injured has had her justice.

[-] BigTwerp@feddit.uk 2 points 2 weeks ago

I wasn't in court so I can't know what evidence was put forward and I wasn't in the jury so I can't know what they decided. According to the article they can be re tried and the mand who attacked the woman with a hammer is still in jail awaiting trial so there is hope of justice yet.

[-] crapwittyname@feddit.uk 2 points 2 weeks ago

So for you, justice will only be done when a jury finds him guilty? Because he's already been tried by jury once

[-] BigTwerp@feddit.uk 1 points 2 weeks ago

Or not guilty. The jury failed to reach a verdict which means the should be re-tried.

[-] CactusEcho@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Five of the defendants were granted bail; Corner was remanded in custody.

Corner hit a police woman in the neck/back with a sledge hammer, so fuck him!

[-] TheJesusaurus@piefed.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago

All cops are bad

this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2026

49 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

5363 readers

456 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

tom@feddit.uk

GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk

flamingos@feddit.uk

frankPodmore@slrpnk.net