108
submitted 1 month ago by mr_MADAFAKA@lemmy.ml to c/gog@lemmy.world
all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mp3@lemmy.ca 74 points 1 month ago

To be fair, Steam/Valve shouldn't be the one that judge the quality of the game, it should be the customers by voting with their wallets.

[-] muhyb@programming.dev 35 points 1 month ago

While I agree there are people who still buy those crap, so gotta put this here:

[-] purplerabbit@piefed.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 month ago

nice slur you got there.....

[-] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

It's true, but so are those that run things. Billionaires, politicians, CEOs, they are all.

[-] NachBarcelona@piefed.social 3 points 1 month ago

What a complete and utter idiot this piece of crap is.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 6 points 1 month ago

I would guess that he's looking for a response to someone pointing out that Steam has a larger game library than GOG.

Like, he's gonna say "yes, but a higher proportion of the excluded games aren't good".

[-] M1ch431@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Agreed. Open publication, as opposed to gatekeeping publication, is desirable for creative expression in society.

Just imagine how many great works never saw the light of day or reached completion because publishers didn't bite. Obviously the internet and digital media broke this dynamic to a degree, but I'm sure it's a significant amount.

[-] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 6 points 1 month ago

However they've banned games without reason many times. Wanting to be a broad marketplace is fine, but I just wish they were either committed to the bit or went back to curation because they had a higher density of good games back in the days of Greenlight.

[-] purplerabbit@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago

Ah yes, the market will decide. And famously, the market has always been good at deciding.

No, I think that's bullshit. I think Valve should curate more of their games. I don't think they should allow Nazi trash and fucking hate crime simulators on their platform.

[-] muhyb@programming.dev 2 points 1 month ago

Steam has more trash than games nowadays. I wish they never stopped curating games. At least to some degree even if not fully.

[-] AlexanderTheDead@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Don't those games largely get removed from the platform?

[-] Lipriv30@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

No one likes a devil’s advocate.

[-] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 35 points 1 month ago

I'd argue that ease of use is a major component of quality.

[-] bountygiver@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago

this, valve did not make those games. So the quality of steam is the ease of use

[-] THE_GR8_MIKE@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago

Didn't Gabe say this like 15 years ago?

Piracy is not a price issue, it's an availability issue. Steam makes it so easy to just... buy a game.

[-] ieGod@lemmy.zip 26 points 1 month ago

Valves competitors love to complain. Compete or don't, the whining is lame as fuck.

[-] Godort@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

That's specifically what he's aiming to do.

GOG has a new owner and CEO and he's read the room in gaming journalism. He needs to make sure people understand that this isnt some Embracer Group buyout situation, and he's doing that by specifically targeting Valve's shortcomings:

  • DRM and questions of ownership
  • Contracts starting at a 70/30 split
  • Censorship of adult content

This is exactly what competing with Valve looks like. They just need to stick the landing.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I mean, it's true that there are lots of games sold on Steam that aren't great games, but that doesn't hurt me much.

There are lots of products on Amazon that aren't that great.

There are lots of websites on the Internet that aren't that great.

As long as I can get to the stuff I want, all good.

EDIT: I think that a better selling point for GOG than that it excludes more not-good games is that the offline installer model can survive GOG going down.

Or maybe that GOG gives you control over updates. There are ways to do this with Steam, but it's not an intended mode of operation, and some people, like heavy Skyrim modders, where an update can cause major breakage, really want control over when they update.

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

If the dev isn't a bastard they can make different versions available through steam. Rocksmith found the last shred of decency in their body after breaking cdlc and put the previous version up. Outside of that, yeah it can be rough.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The publishers can do it via uploading beta branches, but there's also a way to tell the Steam client to fetch old versions independently of that. I remember it coming up specifically with Skyrim, because updates broke a lot of modded environments, and it takes a long time for a lot of mods to be updated (during which time people couldn't play their modded installs).

searches

https://steamcommunity.com/app/489830/discussions/0/4032473829603430509/

The download_depot Steam console command.

The above link is about Skyrim, but also links to a non-Skyrim-specific guide that talks about how to obtain manifest IDs for versions of other games.

But, yeah. It's really not how Steam's intended to be used, and I imagine that hypothetically, one day, it could stop working.

There are also IIRC some ways to block Steam from updating individual games, but again, not intended functionality.

searches

https://steamcommunity.com/discussions/forum/0/3205995441631274440/

If you specifically want control over game updates for some game, then GOG can be a major benefit for that.

One concern I have is that games can be purchased


Oxygen Not Included, for example, was purchased by Tencent, which added data-mining. Fortunately, in that case, Tencent was open about what they were doing, and allowed players to opt out


if they let Tencent log data about them, they could "earn" various in-game rewards. But I could imagine less-pleasant malware being attached to games after someone purchases IP rights to them and just pushes it out. Can't do that with GOG, since there's no channel intrinsically available to a game publisher to push updates out (unless the game has that built-in to itself).

[-] Hawke@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

searches

Not using Kagi anymore? What have you moved on to?

[-] tal@lemmy.today 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

DDG mostly. I'm not unhappy with Kagi on any particular technical aspect, but I'm not happy about the fact that I learned that it was operating out of Serbia (it was often listed as being based in the San Francisco Bay Area; this appears to actually be a residence of the founder, not where the employees and offices are). I'd be much more comfortable about them getting in practical legal trouble if they wound up retaining data after saying that they don't if they were operating in a US or EU or something legal jurisdiction. I posted about it to !kagi@programming.dev a while back.

If they moved operations to the US or somewhere like that, I'd have no problem using them.

[-] Hawke@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Thanks, good to know. I split between DDG and Kagi, not entirely happy with either.

I miss the old google.

[-] leave_it_blank@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Gog has one fantastic advantage over their competition. You buy it, you own it forever if you download the installer.

At least for me that's the thing that counts. And the reason my money only goes to gog.

[-] Jarix@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

... If it requires an installer, then it it not your forever. That's one hostile take over away from losing your ability to play a game

[-] oblomov@sociale.network 8 points 1 month ago

@Jarix @leave_it_blank offline installers (what you get from GOG) are forever. Ask my library of archived GOG installers.

[-] Jarix@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Mea culpa. I mistook installer for launcher

[-] oblomov@sociale.network 4 points 1 month ago

@Jarix oh, that, yeah. GOG is currently in a decent position because it has a launcher, but it's basically a “thin layer” on top of APIs that allow anyone to download the installers (plus some services to manage those installations). As long as the underlying APIs remain accessible, it's fine. (This is e.g. how lgogdownloader allows one to archive their whole library for offline installation.)

[-] TuxOnBike@norden.social 2 points 1 month ago

@Jarix

Can you please elaborate on that? The GOG installers work offline so as long as as you keep your downloaded installer around and an iso of the OS it’s compatible with, it’s yours forever by my definition. But would love to hear your take on this.

@leave_it_blank

[-] Jarix@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Shit sorry, I hastily replied and confused installer for launcher. Mea culpa

[-] TuxOnBike@norden.social 4 points 1 month ago

@Jarix Ah ok, happens. No worries.

[-] Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

I’m trying to buy around 50% of my games on GOG and the other 50% on Steam.

Clearly the ease of use award goes to Steam, especially on Linux.

Gog is still okay thanks to Heroic but it is a commitment with no background downloading on Steam Deck and slow downloads.

I guess we, gamers, only have to make sure that Valve still has competition so that they can’t just turn evil.

For now, I really appreciate how Valve is supporting Linux and I appreciate how GOG understand that we want to own our games and play them forever.

[-] wer2@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 month ago

GOG, please make a Linux version of Galaxy.

[-] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 4 points 1 month ago

Gog added daikatana to their library the same day they changed their name from good old games they have absolutely no fucking room to talk.

[-] sukhmel@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago

I didn't quite follow, do you mean Daikatana is so bad they didn't add it before because they were called ‘good’ but not anymore?

[-] RickyRigatoni@retrolemmy.com 4 points 1 month ago

More of the coincidence that they did the two things on the same day. It was like they were proving something.

[-] BigTrout75@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

GOG didn't become dumpster fire.

[-] RetroHax@feddit.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

For me the Main Thing i think is thats its jes the Ease of Use of Uploading Games but obviously also due Steam being much much more Main Stream than lets say Epic or GOG >.> Itd personally be fine tho anyways with DRM Free Good Video Games than a bunch of Slop and Crap Games flooding the Market considering Steam is basically overrun to a degree with Streamer Bait Games -.-

this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
108 points (100.0% liked)

GOG

3511 readers
1 users here now

GOG.com is a DRM-free games and movies distribution service that is part of the CD Projekt Group. GOG.com is also a "sister" company to CD Projekt Red, developers of the Witcher series and Cyberpunk 2077.

Rules:

  1. No piracy discussion
  2. No harassment
  3. For post that is not in English, Please tag the language

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS