55
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Aatube@kbin.social 28 points 1 year ago

Stop posting business insider, almost every legitimate thing there you can find covered better by other sources and all exclusives are probably improperly sourced

[-] argo_yamato@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago

Bill Simmons, founder of the Spotify-owned podcast network The Ringer, hinted in May that Spotify also planned to use AI trained on the voices of hosts to generate targeted ads for users.

This is what is really messed up to me (emphasis mine).

IANAL but pretty sure that's illegal.

It violates the right of publicity (which is either state-specific or common law) which is explicitly recognized to include commercial control of the likeness of oneself. That most certainly includes someone's voice. There's probably an argument that for AI generated translations some podcast producers have an interest in that they might wanna agree (broader reach), but with ads that is pretty cut and dry. At that point, I kinda hope the legal department knows this, because otherwise this could do incredible damage to their PR (as anything illegal does).

[-] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 year ago
[-] AcornCarnage@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah, this sounds like a really GOOD use of AI.

[-] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

The part that the news line wants to point at probably is where it might be planned to use to create ads using podcaster's voices. I don't see what's the issue there is, now the podcasters can be paid to get their voice imitated for an ad they don't even have to practice the lines for.

[-] SaintWacko@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago

But do they have control over what's in the ads? I know I wouldn't want my voice used to promote things without my knowledge

[-] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

I am very sure that any company that doesn't want to risk legal battles would respect your choice. If the usage of your voice is behind a contract, you can definitely ask what it will be about and what will be said with the freedom to refuse it.

Its the same situation of using without AI another company's brand to sponsor something else.

[-] webghost0101@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

And will they really be paid or provided a choice?

I fully agree that this is a great use for ai but voices are a part of peoples identity we should be careful before selling it is normalized like taxes

[-] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

I think so. Unless they eventually want to end up in a legal battle.

[-] CautiousPickle@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

It sounded good so I tried this and it's so so at best.

First off, I pay for no ads. To me, a fake DJ attempting to convince me it's a black man talking nonsense is just as bad or worse than ads.

Second, the music choices are early days Pandora bad. It starts off okay then a few songs later it's off on some tangent with no rhyme or reason I can understand.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Spotify is rolling out a new AI feature mimicking the original voice of podcasters and translating them into additional languages for a more "authentic listening experience," the company announced Monday in a blog post.

"A podcast episode originally recorded in English can now be available in other languages while keeping the speaker's distinctive speech characteristics," per Spotify's blog.

Spotify is working with podcasters like Dax Shepard, Monica Padman, Lex Fridman, Bill Simmons and Steven Bartlett to produce voice translations for specific episodes in languages such as Spanish, French, and German.

Bill Simmons, founder of the Spotify-owned podcast network The Ringer, hinted in May that Spotify also planned to use AI trained on the voices of hosts to generate targeted ads for users.

There have been mounting concerns in the entertainment industry about the impact of AI being used to clone the voices of musicians, actors, and presenters without their consent or providing financial compensation.

Actor and comedian Stephen Fry also recently said that an AI had ingested his readings of the "Harry Potter" books and subsequently recreated his voice.


The original article contains 285 words, the summary contains 178 words. Saved 38%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2023
55 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59119 readers
3462 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS