51
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago

This is astroturfed. No one was demanding they prove the robot wasn't human. It's a thing the company planned to do ahead of time, and then they've planted this story. I've seen this posted several places, but I haven't encountered anyone who was like "oh wow, I thought it was a person"

[-] Kenny2999@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago
[-] metaStatic@kbin.earth 2 points 1 month ago

if it's on site it's part of the tech demo.

much more likely to be some dude in the Philippines.

[-] Dojan@pawb.social 24 points 1 month ago

There are people with prosthetic legs. Was expecting the chest to be cut open but they just did a leg. That proves nothing.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 10 points 1 month ago

Here's some video of one moving around with no skin whatsoever.

Why is it so hard for people to believe that this is an actual robot?

[-] Dojan@pawb.social 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Why is it so hard for people to believe that this is an actual robot?

Because we live in an age of tech-bro grifting. The great grifter Musk had some person in a skin suit pretending to be a robot. We have all these “AI” companies selling air castles.

Anyone who isn’t skeptical is gullible.

Why would it be real? The video you’ve sent is a puppet on a string, suspended from the roof.

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 5 points 1 month ago

It's clearly not suspended from that cable. You can clearly see how much slack there is in it. This is just another example of striving to find some excuse not to believe that it's real, no matter how much of a stretch it takes to get to that conclusion.

[-] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago

A healthy amount of skeptism is good for people. You can't just go along everything being take at face value.

But also there are people who'll down vote content just because the content is in foreign language, people or accent.

And also there are people who think videos that existed before the AI could generate a face, are somehow AI now.

I don't know where I'm going with this. just saying internet is fucking weird and people here are even weirder. Like me

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 5 points 1 month ago

Because all of these robot tech demos tend to be very misleading

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 4 points 1 month ago

All of them? Hardly. This very demo is a counterexample.

I suspect it's more that lots of people don't want these to be actual robots.

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 2 points 1 month ago

Tend to = all of them to you?

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 5 points 1 month ago

Because all of these robot tech demos tend to be very misleading

Emphasis added.

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 2 points 1 month ago

Yes, of the set that is all robot tech demos to a crowd, the vast majority are misleading. They tend to be misleading

[-] evenglow@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Most people don't understand these demos. So instead of saying that they say misleading instead.

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 3 points 1 month ago

The most convincing part for me was how clearly unprepared to be on stage the tech with the scissors was

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 18 points 1 month ago

I understand the need to wrap the mechanism to help keep it clean, but why no zippers or Velcro or something? From the perspective of a technician, cover panels should be easily removable for access, especially on a prototype. Cutting off the covering onstage seems... dramatic.

Also, um... why does it have boobs?

[-] FishFace@piefed.social 17 points 1 month ago

Are you gonna buy a household robot that you CAN'T fuck?!

[-] JohnnyCash@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 month ago

Actually my robot vacuum is way better at sucking!

[-] FishFace@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago

You know we HAD been considering getting one...

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 6 points 1 month ago

Well this isn't a prototype, it's a tech demo.

Not only does it have a full outer covering, it also has a thick underweave layer that makes it more fleshy. It has a surprising amount of corners and pinchy bits underneath - honestly sealing it completely is probably also to protect nearby humans

As for the boobs... Well, I kinda figured humanity would wait until we had a generation of useful robots before giving them boobs, but we were always going to end up here...

[-] FaceDeer@fedia.io 4 points 1 month ago

Also, um... why does it have boobs?

You know why. Because it makes it look more appealing.

[-] Sims@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Also, um… why does it have boobs?

because we can! The real question is: Why only ONE pair !!! I mean, it could be a huge boob that walked around on smaller boobs ! ..or boob hands with long sausage boobs (grandpa tits?) as fingers. Someone fucked up here !

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

OK, now cut the remote operator open

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 4 points 1 month ago

remote operator bleeds white

[-] riskable@programming.dev 8 points 1 month ago

The video suggested that people could not believe that such innovation could come from a Chinese company... No. People are skeptical of Chinese startups because so many are scams and full of shit.

Innovation can come from anywhere. A tech demo where they faked "people not believing it's a robot" doesn't help to reduce that well-earned reputation.

[-] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 month ago

This video shows absolutely nothing.

[-] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They've got the movement down, but so far robots in general are remotely operated for household chores besides just picking up stuff.

[-] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago

Real or not it's comical to see wankies seething over this. But, if it was Apple telling you nothing much but "the best iPhone yet", they'll defend every god damn criticism of it like their identity depends on it.

Fight on about who's more gullible, I guess.

this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2025
51 points (100.0% liked)

Futurology

3530 readers
29 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS