45
submitted 1 week ago by schizoidman@lemmy.zip to c/europe@feddit.org

German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius intends to order an additional 15 F-35 fighter jets from U.S. manufacturer Lockheed Martin, a parliamentary source told Reuters on Monday, confirming a report by Spiegel magazine.

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Hotznplotzn@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 week ago

Good. Europe and its allies must ramp up its own production capabilities, but as long as this isn't the case, there is not much choice I assume.

[-] Ziggurat@jlai.lu 19 points 1 week ago

must ramp up its own production capabilities

Which is why buying US made plane sucks,

It's especially a pitty for Germany who has a big industrial complex

[-] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

It's especially weird seeing how Germany has over a hundred euro fighters with 50 more on order..

[-] Skua@kbin.earth 8 points 1 week ago

To be fair, whether or not the F-35 is the right choice here, the Eurofighter and the F-35 are for different jobs. The Eurofighter is first and foremost for fighting other aircraft, while the F-35 sacrifices some capability in that regard to be better at blowing up stuff on the ground. That's why the Americans have both the F-22 and the F-35. The Eurofighter is our F-22, not our F-35

I don't doubt that the F-35 could take on most other aircraft very effectively, but a big country like Germany is spending enough and flying enough to warrant specialisation

[-] remon@ani.social 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The Eurofighter is first and foremost for fighting other aircraft, while the F-35 sacrifices some capability in that regard to be better at blowing up stuff on the ground.

The only major thing the F-35 is giving up is super-cruise, which makes it less suitable as an interceptor specifically.

I don’t doubt that the F-35 could take on most other aircraft very effectively

For general air-to-air combat and establishing air-superiority the F-35 is still vastly superior. Their stealth allows them to engage other air targets BVR before being spotted themselves. They have been wiping the floor with every other NATO aircraft except the F-22 in past red flag exercises.

[-] Skua@kbin.earth 4 points 1 week ago

It's also significantly heavier with the same thrust and less wing area, and its payload is limited unless it uses external hardpoints that worsen its stealthiness.

I have read reporting on F-35s getting a 15-1 kill ratio at Red Flag 17, but it's worth noting that the aggressor aircraft at that one were F-16s. That's a capable plane in its own right of course, but it's twice as old as the Typhoon and hasn't had all of the same modernisation

Oddly enough there's actually an interview with two pilots of the relevant aircraft who duelled during an exercise last year in which they (very briefly) discuss some of the advantages https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=upqVaKWQ_EU

[-] remon@ani.social 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Very interesting interview. I think they were training specifically for close air combat in the scenario, which is not something the F-35 is meant to do. But it makes sense to at least train for it. They just really briefly mention my point in the video at this timestamp.

[-] gigachad@piefed.social 7 points 1 week ago

Developing a fighting jet needs time, the aim for FCAS is 2040, and at the moment it looks like that is not going to happen. For the next 20 years an alternative is needed.

[-] FurryMemesAccount 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You assume wrong. There many local, superior options : gripen, Eurofighter and best of all, Rafale.

[-] remon@ani.social 6 points 1 week ago

None of those is superior.

[-] trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

They are superior insofar that that crazy annoying orange Putin puppet across the pond can't shut them down easily.

[-] remon@ani.social 3 points 1 week ago

The "kill-switch" is a myth.

And as much as I'd like to piss of Trump by denying the US the business, it shouldn't come at the expense of our military capabilities.

[-] trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 week ago

Even if there is no literal kill switch, you can easily ground a high tech gadget like a modern fighter jet in short order by ceasing delivery of spare parts.

[-] remon@ani.social 3 points 1 week ago

A good amount of the parts are already produced in Europe. Also there is over 20 F-35 operators already, almost all friendly to each other. Unless the US would cut of everyone from crucial spare part deliveries, they could still be sourced.

Also if the US would actually do such a thing that would guarantee that no one will ever buy their fighter jets again and they love selling fighter jets. It's just not a realistic scenario.

[-] trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Also if the US would actually do such a thing that would guarantee that no one will ever buy their fighter jets again and they love selling fighter jets. It’s just not a realistic scenario.

The US has never done anything stupid that has damaged itself more than others, especially not the current government, right?

At this point, the US should be considered both an enemy and a Russian client state. Whenever Putin makes a phone call to Trump, he will parrot whatever Putin is saying for a couple weeks.

[-] remon@ani.social 2 points 1 week ago

I don't think that Trump would be allowed to fuck with Lockheed Martin's stock price.

[-] trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

At the current state of affairs it looks more like he is allowed to do anything he likes and nobody is going to stop him.

[-] remon@ani.social 1 points 1 week ago

But if there is any institution that can stop him, at least from fucking them over, it's the military industrial complex.

[-] trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

They haven't done anything like that so far, why should they now, or in the future?

[-] remon@ani.social 1 points 1 week ago

I wouldn't be so sure about that. Trumps constant flip-flopping on Ukraine is a an example where you can be sure that both the military and the adjacent industries are lobbying behind the scenes.

[-] trollercoaster@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The thing is, neither he, nor the country with a political system and societal climate that got him into office for a second time can be trusted.

[-] princessnorah 1 points 1 week ago

Parts are made in Australia as well. I know because I've been part of protests urging the government to stop sending them to Israel.

this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2025
45 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

7643 readers
788 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS