561

You might not even like rsync. Yeah it's old. Yeah it's slow. But if you're working with Linux you're going to need to know it.

In this video I walk through my favorite everyday flags for rsync.

Support the channel:
https://patreon.com/VeronicaExplains
https://ko-fi.com/VeronicaExplains
https://thestopbits.bandcamp.com/

Here's a companion blog post, where I cover a bit more detail: https://vkc.sh/everyday-rsync

Also, @BreadOnPenguins made an awesome rsync video and you should check it out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eifQI5uD6VQ

Lastly, I left out all of the ssh setup stuff because I made a video about that and the blog post goes into a smidge more detail. If you want to see a video covering the basics of using SSH, I made one a few years ago and it's still pretty good: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FKsdbjzBcc

Chapters:
1:18 Invoking rsync
4:05 The --delete flag for rsync
5:30 Compression flag: -z
6:02 Using tmux and rsync together
6:30 but Veronica... why not use (insert shiny object here)

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MangoPenguin 4 points 1 week ago

Surely restic or borg would be better for backups?

Rsync can send files and not delete stuff, but there's no versioning or retention settings.

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

For versioning/retention, just use snapshots in whatever filesystem you're using (you are using a proper filesystem like ZFS or BTRFS, right?).

[-] MangoPenguin 2 points 1 week ago

How does that get sent over rsync though? Wouldn't you need snapshots on the remote destination server?

Why not just use a backup utility instead?

Yes, async copies files to the remote server, the remote server takes regular snapshots.

Why not just use a backup utility instead?

What is that utility providing that snapshots + rsync doesn't. If rsync + snapshots is sufficient, why overcomplicate it with a backup utility?

[-] MangoPenguin 2 points 1 week ago

The main things that come to mind are you have to test/monitor 2 seperate actions instead of 1, and restores of single files could be more difficult since you need to login to the backup server, restore the file from a snapshot, then also copy that file back to your PC.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

If you add --delete-before, it absolutely can delete stuff.

[-] MangoPenguin 4 points 1 week ago

Yeah but then it's not really a good backup!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] portnull@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Maybe I am missing something but how does it handle snapshots?

I use rsync all the time but only for moving data around effectively. But not for backups as it doesn't (AFAIK) hanld snapshots

[-] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

yeah, it doesn't, it's just for file transfer. It's only useful if transferring files somewhere else counts as a backup for you.

To me, the file transfer is just a small component of a backup tool.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] tomkatt@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Rsync is great. I’ve been using it to back up my book library from my local Calibre collection to my NAS for years, it’s absurdly simple and convenient. Plus, -ruv lets me ignore unchanged files and backup recursively, and if I clean up locally and need that replicated, just need to add —delete.

[-] dohpaz42@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Here’s how I approach old and slow:

  1. Older software is mature and battle tested. It’s been around long enough that the developers should know what they’re doing, and have built a strong community for help and support.
  2. Slow is okay when it comes to accuracy. Would I love to back up my gigabytes (peanuts compared to some of you folks out there with data centers in your attics) in seconds? Yes. But more importantly, I’d rather have my data be valid for if I ever need to do any kind of restore. And I’ve been around the block enough times in my career to see many useless backups.
[-] Jessica@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 weeks ago

If you're trying to back up Windows OS drives for some reason, robocopy works quite similarly to rsync.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dum_lion@feddit.uk 1 points 2 weeks ago

Y’all don’t seem to know about rsbackup, which is a terrible shame for you.

[-] dum_lion@feddit.uk 1 points 2 weeks ago

(I mean the one on greenend.org.uk!)

[-] Tiger_Man_@szmer.info 1 points 2 weeks ago

I use cp and an external hdd for backups

[-] CannedYeet@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

If you want rsync but shiny, check out rshiny

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
561 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

52295 readers
377 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS