130
submitted 2 days ago by Sunshine@piefed.social to c/canada@lemmy.ca
top 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] leastaction@lemmy.ca 4 points 16 hours ago

Permanent Daylight Savings Time is the worst possible solution, so that is probably what they will go with.

[-] IndridCold@lemmy.ca 4 points 12 hours ago

Either way. I don't care. Just stop fucking with the time.

[-] Mossheart@lemmy.ca 2 points 15 hours ago

" ok, first cut the top off your blanket, sew it on to the bottom of your blanket.

Don't you love your new longer blanket?"

-Daylight savings advocates, probably.

[-] Templa@beehaw.org 3 points 1 day ago

I don't care about the time change but personally I prefer standard time.

[-] BCBoy911@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago

Ending DST is such an easy and effortless political win that I don't know why it hasn't been done yet.

[-] Sunshine@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

BC’s gov said they want to keep it in sync with the US even though Saskatchewan, Arizona and the Yukon do not perform the clock switch anymore.

[-] yannic@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

I don't want to hear about a DST bill if it's a private member's bill from a back-bencher, but I'll bite.

[reads article]

Ugh.

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 day ago

now i know this is unpopular, but i just wanna get home from work and still have sunlight left to enjoy. make it permanent.

[-] Kichae@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago
[-] xthexder@l.sw0.com 8 points 1 day ago

Like most people have a choice...

[-] brax@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

Who the fuck wants to go to bed earlier?

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[-] dom@lemmy.ca 36 points 2 days ago

I dont care which we do. Just fucking pick one.

[-] 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago

I prefer the time zone where the sun comes up later and sets later...

Most of us arent farmers anymore. We dont need sunrise at 5am

Would prefer to have a bit of light after work

Exactly. Just pick one and stick with it.

[-] brax@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Preferably the one where we gain an hour, not the one where we're robbed of an hour.

[-] bdot@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago

we have been having a variant of this headline appear ubiquitously every six months for decades.

we all know it’s a dumb idea, and we all agree that the science and data prove it, so why do we still have it?

well - because Ontario says we can’t change if New York doesn’t, and New York says we can’t change if Ontario doesn’t. it’s like a big unnecessary game of chrono-chicken. one of these regions needs to just go plowing straight ahead. the loser will absolutely end up copying the winner.

ps - Chrono Chicken would be an awesome band name.

[-] prodigalsorcerer@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

Did New York say that? I thought Ontario and Quebec had passed bills that would end it as soon as NY also did it.

[-] bdot@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

passing bills that say we WILL do it, really doesn’t mean anything. it’s just political posturing.

basically, this is the exact same as what i was saying : we won’t do it unless the other guy guys do it.

[-] prodigalsorcerer@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Why doesn't it mean anything?

It literally means that if NY ends DST, we will follow suit to match them. It doesn't do anything until then, if that's what you mean, but it still has actual meaning beyond political posturing.

It's also not what you said. You said NY had already committed to doing it (which they haven't) if Ontario did it too. I can't find anything about Quebec passing a similar bill, so I may have been mistaken about that.

[-] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ontario has a law on the books that will trigger once NY and QC get their shit together

[-] bdot@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

they sure do, but it’s really not the same as actually just doing instead of saying “we will do it if the other guy does it”

[-] uhmbah@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

This. You can look up the texts and documents from Parliament. We are waiting on the United States

[-] Reannlegge@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 days ago

Oh it did not even occur to me that it’s that time of the year again. The only times that this time change stuff has effected me in my adult life was one fall, I showed up to class an hour early once or I went to do some government work an hour early. I live in Saskatchewan and the showing up to class an hour early was because my phone decided I was not in Saskatchewan, after that mix up I have stayed on top of making sure my electronics do not believe I follow that silliness. Years later while I was working for Statistics Canada the stupid software had no idea how to handle Saskatchewan not following that silliness so I showed up to someones home and hour early.

[-] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

Ya, I don't know why it took so many years for Sasktel not to change the time in a non-DST province.

I haven't been experienced it in a while, so I assume they've got it fixed.

[-] Reannlegge@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

The university class would have been in the late 2000’s the Stats Canada computer would have been in the late 2010’s.

[-] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 days ago

Just don't do permanent DST. It's bad for our health, it's bad for kids, and it doesn't make sense.

Just do proper solar time.

[-] nyan@lemmy.cafe 6 points 1 day ago

It's never been proper solar time from the beginning. The timezone boundaries are distorted to align with political boundaries, which messes up any alignment with solar time.

[-] yannic@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Times can be adjusted. The problem isn't the time at which things happen, it's that it cycles back and forth,

[-] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 14 points 2 days ago

No thanks. I’m headed to work in the dark regardless if it’s DST or Standard. Let me at least see the sun on my way home.

[-] Maven@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 2 days ago

Oh, well, I mean, study after study has shown permanent daylight time is terrible for childrens' development, but if it's convenient for you I guess we should lol

[-] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Not sure where they did this study, but around here, kids that have to be at school for 8:00 are going in during the dark regardless of DST or not. Plus, they already delayed the switch by nearly a month “for the children” so they are not out in the scary dark for Halloween. So which is it?

[-] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago

On the solstice sure, but you still increase the number of days per year when that happens.

[-] Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago

Omg yes. 100000000000 times yes. I don't care which we keep (though I'd prefer the summer time if I had to choose, but I'll take any at this point).

[-] fourish@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I love DST. It lets me identify clueless whiners so quickly. If they whine about DST I have no time for someone because it’s literally the easiest thing in the world.

[-] xthexder@l.sw0.com 2 points 1 day ago

The time switch itself isn't that terrible. But sunset before 5pm can fuck right off.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

This is the big problem government needs to deal with right now?

[-] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago

What a bold stance on a trivial matter in a time of multiple simultaneous existential crises.

So brave. So wise. This is peak Leadership.

[-] blindsight@beehaw.org 1 points 1 day ago

Enough whataboutism, please. The Government has hundreds of MPs; it doesn't make sense for all of them to spend all their time on the same small subset of issues, even if they're critical. Like, it's literally impossible to have that many people at a literal table.

[-] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Small subset of issues? Lol. We're in a damn near everything crisis.

Edit: I propose the Daylight Savings Time working group work on fucking foodbanks, for one out of a billion more important issues.

https://macleans.ca/society/why-are-canadas-food-banks-collapsing/

Edit 2: Whataboutism is a disingenous technique to deride progress along certain lines. This isn't that. This is prioritization. Sad you can't tell the difference.

Hungry people including children vs moving the clock an hr for half the year? There are so many critical issues right now.

[-] Bo7a@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago

Yeah. Imagine an MP discussing something their constituents almost all want. What a piece of shit.

[-] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

It's a question of priorities. This ain't one of them.

[-] Bo7a@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago

Now you are just pretending to be stupid on purpose. Cut it out.

[-] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 4 points 1 day ago

Instead of using your time to help solve important issues, you're commenting on Lemmy. You make me sick.

[-] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Right back at'ya.

this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2025
130 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10505 readers
458 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS