13
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dexchemist@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I think it would be pretty cool to see but in no fucking way is it worth trying to get there.

[-] Evono@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Specially if you consider its actually WAY WAY easier for us technologically to go into space than the god damn Deep sea atm. Specially if you want to put people down there so it needs a space with O2 inside and everything.

[-] TheButtonJustSpins@infosec.pub 1 points 1 year ago

I'd watch a quick video clip

[-] MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

I suspect many rich people are desensitised to fun. They spend more and more, on more and more adventurous bs, out of sheer boredom.

[-] Geek_King@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Like how an addict's tolerance to their drug of choice grows and grows. So you're telling me not being ultra mega rich is allowing me to maintain my levels of fun. Huzzah!

[-] alejandro@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Because it's cool

[-] jballs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I get it. If I had stupid amounts of money and someone was like, "hey wanna go see the Titanic?" I'd be like, "nah, I saw it in theaters and it was too long. Oh wait you mean the actual Titanic?! Fuck yeah!"

[-] rbhfd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
  • You want to go see the Titanic?

  • Nah, it's too long

  • No, I meant the actual wreck of the Titanic

  • I know. It's like 270 meters...

[-] Fantismal@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Why do people want to see a concert in person, or a famous building, or a piece of art? You can see the Mona Lisa anywhere in the world on your computer screen, why would you want to go to see the actual picture itself? There are better videos of a Beyonce concert on YouTube than you'll get from a seat in the audience. A football game on ESPN has better coverage than a stadium seat. Why do any of that?

Because the thing itself is special. Viewing it through the screen isn't the same as being there, as having your breath taken away as the sheer enormity of the moment hits you.

[-] loopy@vlemmy.net 2 points 1 year ago

I think visiting a part of history really helps a person appreciate what happened. Seeing something in-person is sometimes just so much more of an experience than a video. I personally would be pretty scared to go in a submarine but I can see the appeal to have a unique historical experience.

[-] rbhfd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I did some basic scuba diving and the coolest thing I saw was definitely a ship wreck. I have pictures of the dive, but they simply don't do it justice.

This was only at 17m depth though, so risk was okay as long as you have the right training and are smart about it.

The Titanic is legendary and must be amazing to see. The fact that you're one of the few people to witness it, definitely adds to the appeal.

Do I think it's worth $250,000 and/or the risk? Definitely not.

For others, that amount if money is just not and issue (sadly), and the risks were not explained clearly to them.

[-] amnesiacrobat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I think some of it is the exclusivity— it’s hard af to there obvious. And some of it is the same impulse people have for going through abandoned buildings. They want to see the decay/ruins.

[-] Bonzo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The Titanic was only found in 1985. Imagine if we found the Malaysia Airlines Flight 370 today intact at the bottom of the ocean. Also it wasn’t just some common vehicle like a Boeing 777, the titanic was the biggest luxury ship ever built at the time. So change Malaysian Airlines flight 370 with Air Force One for cultural parity.

It would be incredibly interesting for someone of our generation to visit it. But a young person in 2060 would just ask why anyone would find an old airplane wreck of any interest.

[-] Thavron@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Also, it speaks to the imagination. It's a brilliant tale of hubris; the ship touted to be unsinkable brought down by an iceberg.

[-] GingeyBook@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

They have a billion dollars and they can

[-] zeppo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Good question. It seems distasteful to gawk at, for one, considering 1500 people died horribly right there. Personally I also don’t have a desire to do outrageously dangerous things for entertainment. There are tons of less dumb ways to enjoy yourself. I appreciate the scientific expeditions that have gone and recorded videos and done a professional job. Some people have lauded the ones who recently died there as “explorers”, but they were not doing anything novel or scientifically useful.

[-] ritswd@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I have a side-question: do they actually see the Titanic directly, when they go down there? It seemed from the pictures that there was only a computer screen in that submersible, and no window. Is it all about seeing it on the screen and feeling the moves of the submersible synchronized to it? That experience feels easily replicable from the surface…

[-] zeppo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I don’t understand why one would think there is no window. I’ve read a couple of comments like that. The thing is called “cyclops”, articles discuss the large porthole dome window, and it’s fairly visible in photos.

[-] Evono@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

pictures that there was only a computer screen in that submersible, and no window.

There was a Washing machine sized glass window Directly at the shitter so you could see out while having the "tasty" smell of fresh pee / poo directly under you.

[-] ritswd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Aaaah alright so the point does make more sense to me now. Particularly when you describe it so attractively. 😉

It still feels like visiting other people’s graves from a horrid and painful mass death, so definitely not for me even if it was safe and cheap, but at least now I get why some people do it, when, ya know, they don’t know what to do with their money and don’t mind dying.

[-] Evono@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Particularly when you describe it so attractively. 😉

Forgot to add a picture so for the toilet so yeah here it is you can see the window on the left of the Photo

So yeah... if you needed togo you had vision outside and if you wanted to look outside you literarily needed to sit next or on the toilet

[-] ritswd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I’m disappointed, there is no place I have ever seen I would have liked to poop in more than that one.

[-] zeppo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Seems like just the worst design. Imagine you’re in this tiny death trap, finally got to the shipwreck after waiting 2.5 hours, then someone is “oh I gotta use the bathroom” and sits down and closes the curtain.

this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
13 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35726 readers
1000 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS