165
all 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Blapoo@lemmy.ml 42 points 1 year ago

We're going to fuck up the global economy with the rampant greed that seems to have come with it, exploiting any and everything (including the planet) in the reckless pursuit of profit for a few.

[-] nexusband@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I just hope the inevitable War will be non-nuclear and NATO won't crumble.

After the war comes comfortable living and the age of enlightenment though. Could be good but I'll be getting too old to enjoy the next bits if I live though the war

[-] Blapoo@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

War? Between who?

[-] WillardHerman@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

Too many assume humans are rational creatures, with free will.

We are not.

[-] treefrog@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And paradoxically, the more you can admit that, the more free you are.

But yeah, 99.99% of our species is ignorant. And the .01% of us who aren't realized holding onto impermanent stuff (and it's all impermanent stuff) is the exact irrational behavior keeping us in chains. So they're not the ones in power anyway.

[-] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago

Jumping into a volcano might do it. I know the scientologists have something to do with valcanos. Maybe they're on to something. I think they thought their God alien thing came from a volcano though, so...

[-] treefrog@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

You were a cloud before and will be a cloud again.

Perhaps when you were a cloud before you asked yourself, how do I become a human? :)

I dunno, the other night I dreamed I was a butterfly and that was pretty bitchin.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 8 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


He said the world was “inching ever closer to a great fracture in economic and financial systems and trade relations; one that threatens a single, open internet; with diverging strategies on technology and artificial intelligence; and potentially clashing security frameworks”.

Guterres broke newer policy ground by putting artificial intelligence – something he described as a subject of awe and fear – at the heart of the UN agenda, confirming he was appointing a high-level panel to report to him on its implications by the end of the year.

“The war, in violation of the United Nations charter and international law, has unleashed a nexus of horror: lives destroyed; human rights abused; families torn apart; children traumatised; hopes and dreams shattered,” he said.

The Brazilian president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, followed Guterres by staking his claim to be the true leader of the global south, telling the UN that market liberalism had plagued democracy and disfranchised millions, leaving them in poverty and prey to nationalist totalitarianism.

He made no direct criticism of Vladimir Putin but said the UN was losing credibility and blamed this frailty on “the specific result of actions from its permanent members who wage unauthorised wars aimed at territorial expansion or regime change.

Lula has come under criticism for saying he would welcome Putin to Brazil, for questioning the role of the international criminal court and for failing to meet the Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, an omission he is due to rectify in New York on Wednesday.


The original article contains 1,035 words, the summary contains 250 words. Saved 76%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I mean we come from absolute fracture if you go back far enough, so it’s familiar territory.

this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2023
165 points (100.0% liked)

World News

38600 readers
1609 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS