132
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SpookyCoffee@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I like valve when they don’t take 30% margin (I don’t deny good stuff valve did, but am not a mindless fanboy like some ya all, it’s a corp nonetheless)

[-] vikingtons@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Astounded to see this take here given how much Valve have contributed to gaming on Linux in general.

[-] warmaster@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Proton made it easy for me to switch to Linux. I'll always be thankful.

[-] Macaroni_ninja@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago

Well at least we can see they spend money on the service they provide and continuously improve user experience.

[-] rising_tony@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

As much as I agree that is too much in general, at least in steam it seems well justified compared to other platforms. We need other platforms to improve so they create good competition against steam and valve are incentivized to actually improve the platform, but the truth is all other platform holders haven't done squat to advance PC gaming:

  • Epic's launcher is abysmal and lacks many QoL features, its been years, they dont get to use the "its a new platform" excuse anymore.
  • EA has gutted and already gutless Origin and turned it for the worse with the new "EA app"
  • Ubisoft Connect is lesser than just an intrusive DRM, it kills performance and it breaks its own apps!
  • Rockstar Games launcher is very barebones and poor, not to mention the lack of games and the blatant anti-consumer practices
  • Other lesser/niche platforms are not even in the running e.g. "Meta" (formerly Oculus)

In general GOG galaxy may get a pass since it is very consumer friendly and is adequate, but it would be a lie to say it is as feature rich as Steam.
Im surely missing some diamonds in the rough, but that is the issue right? They are rough. Steam is very polished even if some areas are still underdeveloped.
Lets just hope the competition is fierce enough that valve continues to make the cut have some value for developers, and lets support studios that push against steam's (and all other platforms) anti-consumer practices.

[-] Damage@startrek.website 24 points 1 year ago

In general GOG galaxy may get a pass since it is very consumer friendly and is adequate, but it would be a lie to say it is as feature rich as Steam.

GOG Galaxy doesn't support Linux

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 year ago

And that's why my money still largely goes to Valve. If GOG supported Linux, I'd buy a lot more games from them, but they seem happy to just piggy back off of FOSS Heroic launcher without actually contributing to it.

I'm not expecting a Stream-level of effort, just the Galaxy launcher a way to select WINE versions. Bonus points if they have official instructions to play games on Steam Deck available on their website.

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago

This. I'd be all over GOG but as it stands, Steam QoL on Linux is superb compared to the other options.

Plus, Proton, supporting that development, etc.

[-] meiko60@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

not really since new UI comes and it wrecked the BPM on Linux

[-] circuitfarmer@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

I never use BPM but I'll look into it, thx

[-] Verat@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

And in spite of the fact that they at one point updated the community wisglist item for Galaxy on Linux to "in development" but I have never heard an update and I couldnt see it on the page anymore, but that might just be mobile.

[-] iforgotmyinstance@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

They literally created and own the Steam marketplace. It's that or make no money on Steam.

[-] dumdum666@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

You know how much the markup in a business (physical goods) is usually? We are talking about 100-300% markup.

[-] SuperSpruce@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Poor analogy. The retailer isn't always adding a 43% (10/7) markup to everything.

[-] flashgnash@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Just because other launchers offer a better cut doesn't make valve evil

Nobody is forcing game devs to use steam over epic, gog, itch etc

[-] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Plus the launcher that takes a lower cut (Epic) is famous for taking forever to add simple basic functions to their store like a shopping cart

[-] flashgnash@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Epic is I think one of my least favourite launchers, though heroic/legendary seems to do a better job

[-] Privatepower42@fosstodon.org 0 points 1 year ago

@flashgnash @mnemonicmonkeys i use heroic on my Mac since gog launcher won’t launch. But, I can not play windows games line I could on steam deck.

[-] flashgnash@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Apple are making steps towards supporting windows games but it's not there right now

Not much a launcher can do if the technology isn't out there to run the games

this post was submitted on 18 Sep 2023
132 points (100.0% liked)

Linux Gaming

15892 readers
56 users here now

Gaming on the GNU/Linux operating system.

Recommended news sources:

Related chat:

Related Communities:

Please be nice to other members. Anyone not being nice will be banned. Keep it fun, respectful and just be awesome to each other.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS