I'm sure this takedown will in no way bring attention to this video.
iirc theyre active on reddit talking about the situation. basically bloomberg lawyers probably striked it for a segment they included in the video, but GN thinks theyre fine because itll be covered by fair use. Basically nothing to do with the parties involved in the topics of the video.
Is there a tldw somewhere before I watch 3.5 hours?
TL;DW:
US banned sales of a certain class of high performance graphic cards to China.
It is actually possible to purchase those cards in China. And it is not very hard to do so.
The prices of said cards in China are quite similar to the ones in the US.
A lot of big players in the market are not happy with the truth presented in this piece by Gamers Nexus.
edit: grammar.
Personal opinion: In this video, there is a demonstration of how a card can have the VRAM enhanced(48GB) and a GPU moved from a PCB to another PCB.
The manufacturers say that VRAM is expensive. I do not think that! Sustainability is possible if it is wanted.
Yeah that's a lot of time for something I have no idea about.
I found it fascinating beyond just the geopolitics of video cards (although the existence of that right there is wild).
It's a really neat look inside China with "real people" (not trade shows, uptight salesmen, or politicians). I don't speak Chinese but it also seemed like Steve Burke had spent a lot of effort learning. He seems very talented and smart while staying humble. That's rare.
Despite it being a 3 hour video about smuggling, the most discomforting thing for me was the left-handed driving in HK and I find that hilarious.
That's just his schtick. Dude and his team make other journalists look like dog shit! I dropped some money on them a year ago for merch. The brass Moscow Mule cups made fantastic drinks for my wife and me and the coasters made for really good workplace Christmas gifts for nerdy coworkers! If you're looking for some holiday gifts coming up, I recommend them. The quality is superb!
Thanks for the heads-up, added the internet archive torrent to seed up to 25MB/s
I found the intro hook intriguing, but the reporting starts with a lot of media clips and other run-ups, which eventually made me leave.
It's great they put in so much effort into genuine, on-site reporting, but the already long video report feels even more bloated/filled this way.
I have to wonder if the DMCA was due to the news clips. While they may be fair use for contextualized reporting, I didn't find them particularly valuable, and DMCA issues could have been avoided without them or without using so many of them.
I have to wonder if the DMCA was due to the news clips. While they may be fair use for contextualized reporting, I didn’t find them particularly valuable, and DMCA issues could have been avoided without them or without using so many of them.
They have said that Bloomburg footage of trump talking about GPUs was the claim. They probably did play a little too fast and loose with copyrighted footage.
Exactly the same - I was very interested in the premise but struggled to make it past this section, too, for the same reasons you've mentioned. Would certainly agree that these clips should've been used more sparingly, as it's a bit of a slog otherwise.
Downloading the torrent so i can seed it on 2.5Gb fiber
seeding on my seedbox, for the people!
They should put it up on peertube and get some visibility for the platform
I started ripping it in Youtube the night it was released! knew this BS would happen.
Just downloaded it. Thanks my guy.
Currently pulling via yt-dlp as well.
I'm a bout an hour in on this. Utterly wild. Fantastic journalism.
Damn I didn't get to watch it. Thank Talos for the IA. I'll add to the torrent when I get home in the morning.
I'd buy this on a bluray.
From what I understand, Bloomberg is one who placed copyright strike on video. Google would need to take a supremacist view towards the content, and supremacist deference to Bloomberg, to understand validity of complaint. What Bloomberg content was featured in documentary, and does it have any basis for unfair use claim?
Prohibition does not work. Documentary showed some 5090 prices in Hong Kong street boutique to be same price as online US availability. It would take monumental geopolitical leverage (with bribery, loss of reserve geopolitical capital) to isolate China which is a 5x+ larger tech market than US. Geopolitical leverage the US is rapidly losing by attacking entire world simultaneously. Singapore is not going to prevent Singapore companies from profiting, hopefully paying taxes, including from employees, to Singapore, would require tremendous US government donations/complete corrupt bribery for Singapore to take "Philippines suicide pact" (Marcos tradition) approach to war on China.
The documentary does show US policy impotence. New geopolitical US posture though is "China must be enslaved to CUDA technology so as to prevent Huawei/SMIC dominance" while China is saying "NVIDIA is a US military controlled agent intent on diminishing China, whose equipment cannot be trusted, and not purchased"
Impotence, necessary supply chain complicity, and imminent collapse of US strategy/policy is what needs to be protected from American consciousness. It is telling that Bloomberg and Google see themselves as such propaganda enforcers. This is more of a deep state CIA favour rather than Trump Administration favour, but neither are acts of nobility.
I had to close the GN vid after he said Russia is allegedly using AI to surveil their citizens.
Like yeah Steve. Conveniently never mention the genocide being committed using AI in the most dystopian way possible. Or anything regarding Israel ever, such as NVIDIA building a multi billion dollar tech campus in Israel right now.
Are you genuinely going to nitpick a video focusing on the black market for gpus... about not calling out your specific concern? My dude - I'd advise you to find perspective that isn't up your own ass.
Yes. It was a hillarious double standard showcasing how biased the reporter is and unwilling to speak the truth. There is nothing to learn from such bad journalism.
Avoiding talking the about Israel while bringing up Western preferred lines is the most suspicious thing a "journalist" can do.
... opposed to the journalist speaking about a topic they set out to cover without derailing things ... and still producing in excess of 3 hours of distilled content. You are exactly what is wrong with the current social media. There are thousands of topics speaking directly about the subject you are concerned with. Go partake in those. You aren't shedding light on something - you are virtue signalling. You aren't being a good steward - you are being a disruptive cunt.
GamersNexus chose to derail things. With rumors about Russia instead of mentioning Israel committing a literal genocide with AI. And they purposely avoid talking about Israel in every single of their videos.
They choose to make their videos political and make political statements. But the hypocrisy on this is too glaring.
You're free to make your own video without what you feel is an egregious oversight.
instead of
Your topic. Your concern. I covered this. You want to drive the topic? Make your own content. I understand there's even a transformative method of reviewing content and talking about it. By all means go do that. Your fanatical pursuit of this accomplishes what? Go on - let us all know your manifesto. Detail to us how this opinion of yours, on a tiny thread, on an even smaller corner of the Internet, is making a difference at all in the topic you are whinging about.
You are a poser looking to self congratulate or a low effort troll. You want to make a difference? Go do it. This isn't it - nor is it a viable path to a solution.
I made content about the review pointing out its pariality. And here you are whining about it.
You are the only one whining about it.
And you are whining for the stupidiest reason.. That a news story focused on X, didnt deeply cover what you want of subject Y.
This is like ordering steak at a restaurant and having fucking toddler meltdown because you didnt get pancakes. in a restaurant that doesnt serve pancakes. at the dinner service.
You made a post about a subject you were concerned with not brought up in a video you watched - and this part is important - on a thread discussing the video getting improperly removed.
Now perhaps you didn't read the title completely and became confused... but assuming you didn't: please tell me how your urgent missive is on topic.
My original response at least provided you the courtesy of a response. You didn't care for it - but that is perfectly fine. Your type rarely enjoy those sort of observations.
If you are looking to derail things further after losing your original position I'd suggest you stop. This behavior is well documented as a standard method of trolling and isn't even novel.
You made a point about staying on topic and lost that point and have now fallen into repetition.
Why the 1.1gb video hosted in the internet archive has a ".ai" in its name?
It has .ia in the file name because it was processed with the Internet Archive’s MP4 tool which optimises the file for streaming by moving some content in the file around. Very common for Internet Archive files and nothing to do with AI.
Why does it matter?
Curiosity matters.
Technology
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.