1238
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] RUN_DMG@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 months ago

But surely the next 30 billion they are going to burn will get it right!

[-] BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

My experience with AI so far is that I have to waste more time fine tuning my prompt to get what I want and still end up with some obvious issues that I have to manually fix and the only way I would know about these issues is my prior experience which I will stop gaining if I start depending on AI too much, plus it creates unrealistic expectations from employers on execution time, it's the worst thing that has happened to the tech industry, I hate my career now and just want to switch to any boring but stable low paying job if I don't have to worry about going through months for a job hunt

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] DarkSideOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

As programmer. It’s helping my productivity. And look I am SDET in theory I will be the first to go, and I tried to make an agent doing most of my job, but it always things to correct.

But programming requires a lot of boilerplate code, using an agent to make boilerplate files so I can correct and adjust is speeding up a lot what I do.

I don’t think I can replaced so far, but my team is not looking to expand the team right now because we are doing more work.

[-] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago
[-] prole 10 points 2 months ago

Why do they keep throwing their money away on it?

[-] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

In no small part because they see it as a time-limited gateway to permanent, infinite profits through market consolidation, job cutting, and government contracts. After all, if they get there FIRST, it's all theirs, and the infinite profits then will make up for all the money spent now. Never mind the fact that in doing so they'll destroy the environment, the economy, and the world long before they can actually SPEND those profits on anything.

[-] grahamja@reddthat.com 7 points 2 months ago

It worked for Google. They corraled a majority of the internet into providing them add revenue. Google maps, Gmail, google search engine, youtube... all just more ways for them to scrape your data and serve you adds. Investors are hedging their bets on what could replace google as the information monopoly of the future.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] null@lemmy.nullspace.lol 9 points 2 months ago

Reading the article, the conclusions seem to line up with what I experience. Namely the part where it says that individual users found a productivity boost.

At my company, we have a bunch of AI based tools set up, and it's impressive how much of the time consuming, boring, burnout-inducing gruntwork I can offload to the robots, and instead spend more of my working hours working on things I actually want to work on.

And we also deploy things like AI search for internal knowledge bases. Being able to quickly get the information you need to complete your job, especially if that information is related to sales is definitely good for business, but I'm not even sure how you'd measure that in terms of "profit".

[-] Mangoholic@lemmy.ml 9 points 2 months ago

Bubbles burst, who would have thought.

[-] 8000gnat@reddthat.com 9 points 2 months ago

he'll yeah, lose money you fuckers

[-] Sunflier@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Does this mean they'll invest the money in paying workers? No... they're just have to double down.

[-] abbiistabbii 9 points 2 months ago

How bad to you think this collapse gonna be? We gonna see a big name collapse into dust or we gonna see something akin to the Great Depression?

[-] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

We’ll see the beginning of a crash in about a year and the crash probably won’t end for 7-10 years.

We’re looking at a full scale shift in the way large scale orgs are running their businesses; and it’s a shift a lot of them will need to pivot from once they realize it’s not working.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] goatinspace@feddit.org 9 points 2 months ago
[-] BreakerSwitch@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

But it's okay, because MY company is AHEAD OF THE CURVE on those 95% losses

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

I think there are real productivity gains to be had but the vast majority are probably leaning into the idea of replacing people too much. It helps me do my job but I'm still the decision maker and I need to review the outputs. I'm still accountable for what AI gives me so I'm not willing to blindly pass that stuff forward.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

We're now at the "if you don't, your competitor will". So you really have no choice. There are people that don't use Google anymore and just use chatgpt for all questions.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2025
1238 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

76592 readers
2540 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS