820
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] JargonWagon@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Anyone But Trump, 2028
Also, where are the Epstein files?

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

Desperate measures require desperate times.

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago

Dictator does dictator things, Americans do nothing. News at 11.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

So he thinks killing people is a joke.

[-] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 11 points 1 month ago

One of the reasons he's so desperate to end the Ukraine War is so he can collect his Nobel Peace Prize, freeing him to start his war with Mexico, and have a draft, essentially enslaving the entire young male demographic so they can't be used against him in a Civil War.

Then he can use the Mexican War as an excuse to suspend elections, even though we've never cancelled an election in our history, not even during the Civil War.

The fact that he lept on Z's remark about no election, illustrated that he's been giving this a lot of thought, wondering what might work as a reasonable excuse. Dems love Zelensky, and he cancelled elections because of the war, so if America is in a war, he can cancel elections, and the Dems will have to accept it. It won't occur to him that there's a difference between fighting a war in a separate country, and fighting a war within your own capital city.

It also won't occur to him that just because something happened in a different country, doesn't mean we have to accept it here. We have a Constitution, that's the rule book, not some nation on the other side of the world.

[-] S0ck@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

We have a Constitution, that’s the rule book, not some nation on the other side of the world.

It's just words on paper if not enforced. And Republicans haven't been keen on enforcing it when it comes to him, not specifically but especially.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 month ago

So who's he going to invade? Mexico or Canada?

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Mexico for sure. It’ll be “to stop the cartels”. Calling it right now.

[-] pivot_root@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

My money is on Canada.

  • Nice, desirable natural resources like fresh water, lumber, and oil.
  • Plenty of non-immigrant immigrants to feed the ~~legal slavery~~ prison industrial complex.
  • Control over arctic trade passages.

And he's been laying the propaganda and groundwork for months now:

  • "joking" about Canada being the 51st state.
  • Claiming Canada is the source of illegally imported Fentanyl, despite overwhelming evidence that almost all of it comes from Mexico.
  • Harsher tariffs than other allied countries, using Fentanyl as the justification for it.
  • Factually incorrect statements about unfair and "illegal" trade restrictions imposed by Canada.
  • Claims about Canada "taking advantage" of the country in regards to national security and a trade deficit that ignores the population and GDP difference.
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CircaV@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

If he tries to invade Canada, Canada’s gonna party like it’s 1814 and we gonna light up the WH - again.

[-] ganksy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Mexico, Canada or civil war. Just be as belligerent as possible to everyone and see who takes the bait.

I'll bet in private he's going nuts that no one has so far. "What the hell do I gotta do to these people?!"

[-] stickly@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Meh, just hold one without him. Get an electoral college quorum and move the new guy in because it's 100% state driven and he can't change the constitution. Like an old time papacy schism, let God sort it out.

[-] Wolf@lemmy.today 13 points 1 month ago

he can’t change the constitution

No, but he's sure proven that he can ignore it. And the Supreme Court will ultimately back him up. And they've already ruled that he can't be charged with anything illegal he does while president (the courts won't even punish him for crimes he was convicted of when not POTUS). And even if they don't rule in his favor he's shown he's willing to ignore the courts when they don't rule in his favor.

If the cops and military side with him- and there is a good chance the majority in both groups are MAGAts, he'll just have people participating in the 'illegal/illegitimate' elections arrested.

If he's still alive in 2028 he will not give up power, I guarantee it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Stop assuming he has good intentions. He does not

[-] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago

9/10 chance trump tries to cite the Ukrainian Constitution, then putin simultaneously tries to de-legitimize Zelenskyy.

Before any tries to use that as an excuse, let me say this: Ukraine has a different history, different circumstances, resulting in a different "social contract", you cannot apply a foreign country's constitution in your own country. Besides, all of their political parties have already agreed to postpone until after the war.

[-] SparroHawc@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago

Oh hey look, it's exactly the thing I was talking about when Trump ran for a second term the first time.

"If Trump wins this election, there won't be any more elections."

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 1 month ago

Again? He was saying the same thing his first term

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 8 points 1 month ago

Oh just dictator things.

[-] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago

Oh no! Who could have seen this coming! Oh, everyone? Oh ok. And people voted for this? Idiocracy to the max! You get what you ask for. You want an autocrat dictator getting rich from your backs, you'll get it!

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 month ago

He learned from Netanyahu.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

We've had one Afghan invasion, yes. But what about second Afghan invasion?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

I'm positive that would only apply, if the US was actually invaded and/or occupied by a hostile power. If it's just the US bombing some other country, then why would local politics be affected?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago

20 bucks on Venezuela, 10 on Mexico and another 10 on Panama

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] zululove@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

That’s ok let’s get prepared to stop him 🛑 ✋🏾

[-] bizza@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 month ago

This man acting like he’s going to see another election

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Red_October@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

"It's just a joke! Unless..."

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2025
820 points (100.0% liked)

politics

26068 readers
2522 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS