46
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by cm0002@piefed.world to c/linux@programming.dev
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] illusionist@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago
[-] trevor 26 points 1 week ago

Using Rust != required to use pushover licenses. It's just a bad convention that a lot of Rust projects adopt.

The Rust code is licensed under GPLv2-or-later.

[-] LeFantome@programming.dev 5 points 6 days ago

It has nothing to do with Rust. Permissive licenses are more popular with new projects. Rust is more popular with new projects.

The stats show that people are more likely to be attacked by a shark on days when they had ice cream. Eating ice cream does not make you more likely to be attacked by a shark. They are just both things that happen at the beach.

[-] trevor 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

So many Rust projects are dual-licensed under Apache or MIT. It's just a convention that many Rust projects have adopted. Yes, it's true that there's nothing intrinsic about Rust the language that requires a certain license type. But it doesn't mean that the Rust community hasn't adopted a convention of licensing with pushover licenses. That's my point.

[-] frongt@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'd check, but they use anubis in front of gitlab, and either it's broken or turned up too high because it's blocking me even though I'm just using standard Firefox on Android, nothing fancy.

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-disk-utility

Edit: it started working. No, GPLv2 or later.

this post was submitted on 16 Aug 2025
46 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

9056 readers
323 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS