97
submitted 3 days ago by schizoidman@lemmy.zip to c/europe@feddit.org

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/46045941

“We need a reality check. Otherwise we are heading at full speed against a wall,” Mercedes chief executive Ola Kaellenius told the Handelsblatt business daily of the 2035 goal, adding that Europe’s car market could “collapse” if it goes ahead.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] arc99@lemmy.world 30 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

No, Europe's car market won't "collapse". The companies which have spent the last 10-15 years planning & investing, and the next 10 years building & rolling out will make the transition and those that haven't will go to the wall.

In fairness to Mercedes they are making some effort. They do offer electric versions for most of their range but they also suck compared to the competition by price & performance. Probably because they're compromised by sharing a platform with ICE vehicles. This isn't the fault of the technology, it's the fault of Mercedes for drawing conclusions from their own bad decisions.

It is also Mercedes fault that they're not knuckling down and solving this issue. Mercedes had better pull its finger out. Or it could whine, spread FUD, or waste money on tangents like "synthetic" fuels. If it chooses the latter, it WILL go bust and have to be bailed out by a competitor.

[-] bassad@jlai.lu 25 points 2 days ago

Reality is that we don't have much oil here in Europe it makes no sense to use a ressource we don't have

[-] PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

We habe a little oil in Europe. We have absolutely no rare earth metals for batteries. Either way we have to import the stuff we need!

[-] lime@feddit.nu 4 points 1 day ago

we have shittons of rare earth metals, but we also don't want to dig them up because of the health risks and environmental damage. we pay other people to tank that.

[-] macros@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

We do have many of them. We just have chosen not to mine them because that creates environmental and health issues and we can obtain them from elsewhere. When we mine them here, then mostly in remote places.

Cobalt: Top producer is DRC, Europe has a minor local production, mostly in Finnland Lithium: Abundant everywhere but difficult to extract, the EU doesn't produce any significant quantities right now Nickel: Only 1.5% produced in EU, again mostly in Finnland Maganese: This is the only metal relevant for current batteries where there are no (known) significant deposits in central EU, some are around the black sea, industrial production is nonexistent.

Where the EU is already more present is in the refining of the raw ores. I think the current situation is, while not great, acceptable. As long as many different producers of the rare metals are available and the EU creates reserves of them (it does), it is fine to be dependent on imports for the moment.

[-] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 20 points 2 days ago

a car brand often driven by douchebags, has a douche as a ceo, makes sense the target audience.

[-] PlutoniumAcid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

No no, in a Europe the douches all drive BMW. Mercedes is only for the wealthy.

[-] Goldholz 1 points 16 minutes ago

Both. Douches and rich

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

I guess we'll just buy chinese cars, then.

[-] manxu@piefed.social 68 points 3 days ago

I think translated from CEO-speak, that means, "Chinese EV manufacturers are currently eating our lunch and dinner with their superior hardware and software and bundling and pricing and we need more than 10 years to get our act together."

This has nothing to do with "Europe's car market." It's all about the market share of European manufacturers. I love them to be strong and healthy, but not at the expense of the planet. Get your act together, you've wasted enough time already.

[-] BigShammy80@feddit.org 6 points 2 days ago

And not to forget how they fucked their costumers with the fake emission numbers!

They really think their costumers are stupid.

Now they get karma, as it should be.

[-] sucius@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago
[-] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[-] Goldholz 1 points 16 minutes ago

Bollerwagen

[-] BigShammy80@feddit.org 7 points 2 days ago
Audi
BMW
Mercedes-Benz
Opel
Porsche
Seat
Skoda
Volkswagen

They all had their fair share in the scandal...

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago

When I had my Sprinter van serviced, the dealer lent me one of their EVs so I could go grab lunch. That car was absolute dog shit. Everything about it felt cheap or half-assed. I am sorry but Mercedes EVs are completely outclassed by the Hyundai IONIQ line. At least BMW EVs still "feel" like BMWs.

[-] Bob@feddit.org 4 points 2 days ago

I haven’t driven any EVs by BMW or Mercedes, but I assume that they’ve improved since they started making them. The new CLA does not look like it’s completely outclassed by the Hyundais: 800 Volt architecture, 320 kW DC charging, highly efficient, decently serviceable drivetrain, comes as an estate. The only advantage the Koreans have is price, and simulated gear shifts on the N models. But in return your car will be ethically produced in Europe, and not made by a company that refuses to withdraw from the Russian market.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Goldholz 10 points 2 days ago

If you dont want to change then die slowly. Others will take your place

[-] GenosseFlosse@feddit.org 11 points 2 days ago

The European car market won't collapse, people will just switch to Chinese EVs who are cheaper to buy and run and have better options. I think this CEO just overestimates the value and brand appeal of his company. Especially young people associate Mercedes with an old people car.

[-] Goldholz 10 points 2 days ago

chinese evs run and have better options

Suuureeee. One look at chinese social media shows the opposite. Them suddenly bursting into flames, uncontrolled self driving, you being able to be locked inside them and, like Huawei, it survaling you 24/7. Yeaaah no i'll gladly pass

Especially young people associate Mercedes with an old people car.

As a young person, first time i heared this.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

US people have a completely different exposure to European brands.

[-] BigShammy80@feddit.org 10 points 2 days ago

Because only old people have the money to buy them... german car's are WAY too expensive.

I buy an asian car with all extras for the price of a german base model, with nothing extra.

[-] arc99@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I think most people associate Mercedes with "expensive" and their electric offerings are even more so. And they're not particularly good EVs either cited for problems with reliability. I think that's the real issue for the brand. The value proposition isn't there, not even for people looking for a luxury car.

[-] Hubi@feddit.org 58 points 3 days ago

The current Mercedes leadership is notoriously incompetent. They'd rather dig their own grave than get with the times. Funny that they are trying to cling to the combustion engine now right after they lost the Chinese EV market.

[-] aard@kyu.de 24 points 3 days ago

Crazy part is that Mercedes makes pretty good EVs - unlike some of the other German manufacturers which struggled a bit, and even though they seem to have the main platform worked out by now still have shitty software. Mercedes software is usable and rock solid - which I didn't expect when we were buying one last year.

In the area I'm living in here in Finland EV Mercedes seems to be the most popular choice currently - the number of EVs is rising very fast, with pretty much all brands present, but a clear majority is Mercedes.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] karashta@sopuli.xyz 52 points 3 days ago

The "reality" is the problems with combustion engines and burning fossil fuels has been known, definitively, for 50 years or so, and these people, instead of planning for the future, ensured its destruction instead.

[-] SaneMartigan@aussie.zone 16 points 2 days ago

The reality check is that we need to be banning cars more than transitioning to electric ones. Build better infrastructure.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

We can't realistically do that. We could aim to lower their usage though.

[-] kbal@fedia.io 26 points 3 days ago

Reality check: You're addicted to oil and it's going to kill you. Give in to the cravings there is no escape. It's not all bad, we'll take care of you. You could have a shiny new S-Class that can go 300km/h. Who could blame you for wanting that? If we don't keep manufacturing cars as quickly as possible the whole economy might collapse. Give us another twenty years to find the solution, it will be fine.

[-] Saleh@feddit.org 8 points 3 days ago

Also we said the same thing 15 years ago, but this time round it will be different, pinky promise.

[-] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 24 points 3 days ago

We need a reality check

When you are used to define what 'reality' is.... 😅

[-] Saleh@feddit.org 6 points 3 days ago

Regulatory capture ultimately leading to lack of innovation and failure..

Who could have predicted this?! Oh the scientists? The same type of people that talk about climate change all the time? Different type of Scientists? There is like more than one science? How should i have known?! i have an MBA!

[-] Tudsamfa@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

What's the matter, big boy, can't compete in the free market? Is your job too hard? Do you need more subsidies? Yeah? Tariffs on Chinese cars? Shall the politicians come over and fuck your wife as well?

[-] bob_lemon@feddit.org 10 points 2 days ago

In any sane economy, this CEO would be terminated immediately for endangering the company.

Delaying he switch to full EV production is actively hurting the required transformation process they should have started 10 years ago. Further delays will just make the impact so much worse, but that's of no concern to the current shareholders, apparently.

[-] EverXIII@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

IMO he should "get on a bike". Literally. I keep walking...

[-] bstix@feddit.dk 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I want cars with combustion engines to hit that wall.

[-] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I don't know what the law says, but prohibiting circulation of CO2 cars in 10 years is excessive, it would cause a crisis where people stop buying cars that are still being produced and no one would buy those used cars. Prohibiting the selling of new CO2 emitting cars in 10 years seems like a very good thing, and gives plenty of time for the industry to adapt.

[-] Fusselwurm@feddit.org 14 points 2 days ago

… funnily enough, the EU plans the latter, while some car makers act as if it meant the former.

[-] shane@feddit.nl 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Banning sales of fossil fuel cars after 2035 is exactly the plan.

[-] Localhorst86@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago

No. Banning sales of non-zero emission plans is the plan, it doesn't specifically ban combustion engines. Combustion engine tech has stagnated like the last 4 decades, though, so it's highly unlikely they'll be zero emission within 10 years.

This is car manufacturers complaining that they haven't made steps forward for 40 years and are now forced to switch to the technology that made them obsolete.

[-] blackn1ght@feddit.uk 3 points 2 days ago

Combustion engine tech has stagnated like the last 4 decades,

This isn't true at all, combustion engines have improved by huge amounts in terms of efficiency and reliability in that time.

[-] Localhorst86@feddit.org 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Reliability? Absolutely.

And on paper, they made significant steps to reduce emissions in their engines. But that's on paper, the VW scandal a few years ago has shown us how trustworthy those figures are.

Efficiency? Not really. Combustion engines used in cars still only average to about 30% effiency, which is a number only marginally higher than what I learned in school over 20 years ago. This is largely because car engines mostly dont operate within their peak-performance/efficiency windows.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] HenriVolney@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 days ago

As silly as horse cars demanding a reality check when confronted with the rise of electric streetcars

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

Mercedes CEO shouting from the ivory tower. They're cooked.

[-] excral@feddit.org 7 points 2 days ago

We should really start emphasising that there is no blanket ban on combustion engines planned but an emissions ban. If the car manufacturers wanted to and found it feasible, they're free to build emission free combustion engines. Every time they call it a combustion engine ban is an admission that they can't or at least won't build better engines.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] banause@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago

It must be difficult for them to always hire a CEO with the name Mercedes.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Kyle_The_G@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2025
97 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

7007 readers
581 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS