58
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by CyberSage@piefed.social to c/piefed_meta@piefed.social

I'm super impressed by the features I'm discovering using Piefed! I'm going to be experimenting a lot with the keyword filter particularly. Here are some ideas we might add to make Piefed even better. Share you own in the replies.

Some of these options where too long to make it a poll.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] artiman@piefed.social 2 points 6 hours ago

ability to mark a reply as a answer

[-] CyberSage@piefed.social 5 points 1 day ago

Browse a list of communities sorted by their Monthly Active Users (MAU). It could make discovering popular or active communities a bit easier. Just a thought! It's not something I'm really missing.

[-] INeedMana@piefed.zip 22 points 2 days ago

One vote action for all cross-post posts

[-] wjs018@piefed.wjs018.xyz 8 points 2 days ago

Hmm, that is an interesting idea...

I might look into this one. Would something like voting buttons in the crosspost dropdown be an acceptable alternative? I think I would prefer to keep 1 action (click) means 1 vote, but making it easier to vote on crossposts makes sense with the way that piefed consolidates comments.

So, voting buttons here maybe? (no promises, just an idea) -

[-] rimu@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

That would be pretty cool.

Probably just upvote, though? Don't want to encourage drive-by downvotes, really.

[-] keepthepace@slrpnk.net 2 points 12 hours ago

I don't think it is a good idea. Some things that are acceptable content in one community may not be in another. You may downvote something in a sub about political news but upvote it in a meme sub or in a nottheonion sub.

[-] INeedMana@piefed.zip 1 points 7 hours ago

I understand that this proposal is to have separate voting controls per cross-posted community, not automatically upvote all

[-] INeedMana@piefed.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Yes, I think that would be an acceptable implementation

[-] QuadratureSurfer@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago

That's a fair point. I think in most cases I would want to be upvoting a post and all of its cross posts, but there are cases where I wouldn't want to upvote it in other communities.

For instance, a post that you like might get cross posted to something like c/facepalm. If you disagreed with that assessment, you wouldn't want your vote to be applied in that way.

[-] rimu@piefed.social 17 points 2 days ago
[-] socsa@piefed.social 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Bring back pseudonymous voting agents. Literally the killer feature of piefed, killed by stupid forum politics.

I do not give a single goddamn fuck about brigading or vote manipulation whatever nonsense the fediverse admin cabal has convinced themselves matters on their discord stovepipe. Vites are not real. They cannot hurt you. I do not want my plaintext voting activity to be hoovered up by anyone listening to the activitypub feeds, which is already used to foster censorship and will inevitably be used to enable targeted astroturfing. Rimu, please be more brave about this.

Mark my words, this will be the "hindsight" issue a few years from now. "How the fuck did anyone think public voting was a good idea" will be the postmortem of the fediverse.

[-] scintilla@beehaw.org 1 points 7 hours ago

People have deluded themselves into thinking that the Fediverse is so small no government entity cares enough to set up a simple instance that just sits there and sucks up data. It might not even be being used at the moment but the moment they want to it would be easier than most people realize to connect their account to an individual.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] cloudless@piefed.social 12 points 2 days ago

Easily upload and include images in comments. Right now you have to use a third party image hosting site, and add the URL in order to put images in comments.

[-] BagOfHeavyStones@piefed.social 10 points 2 days ago

Not sure about other apps, but Summit has an image upload button. They go to media.piefed.social

I would imagine hosting images would cost a fair bit. Perhaps they can have a premium option to fund it.

The website / PWA can't currently upload images.

Summit doesn't have deduplication yet.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 11 points 2 days ago

Allow restricting posting and commenting to subscribers: https://lemmy.world/comment/18549782

[-] CyberSage@piefed.social 7 points 2 days ago

My ideal default would be, users have to subscribe to vote, because drive-by downvotes are very common, and keep niche communities from getting anywhere in the All feed.

[-] socsa@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

Why not just remove down votes from the post ranking algorithms entirely, since they seem to be the cause of a bunch of consternation anyway?

load more comments (24 replies)
[-] Bonus@piefed.social 8 points 2 days ago

Please put the bookmark/save button on the thingy down there. There's plenty of room.

Other than that and some kickass themes, I think PieFed is ahead of the curve in the lemmyverse ATM.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] chromodynamic@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

I thought of another one. In this age of decreasing digital freedom, PieFed (and every other website) should allow people to register multiple email addresses, in case a user suddenly loses access to one.

[-] CyberSage@piefed.social 8 points 2 days ago

Create a clear description of Piefed on the about page or another relevant page to direct users there instead of the code repository or specific instances.

[-] CyberSage@piefed.social 7 points 2 days ago

Many posts don't have a language selected so 'content language' preference should either allow selecting those, or a setting to reverse it turning it into a block list with all languages automatically selected, then allow the user to deselect his language to block the rest.

[-] chromodynamic@piefed.social 4 points 2 days ago

I don't know if these already exist, but thinking long-term of how to prevent Reddit-like problems:

  • An option to move a post to a different community (with the agreement of the other community's moderators) if the post is in the wrong community, but otherwise seems valid/good-faith/high-effort/etc.

  • And for the opposite situation where the post is just garbage, but highly upvoted by bots/brigading, there could be a "nuke it from orbit" option that not only deletes it and bans the poster, but also bans everyone that upvoted it.

[-] rimu@piefed.social 1 points 1 day ago

Moving a post would be great, yep.

Not all votes are intentional, I think there needs to be manual review in there. Will look for opportunities to add some kinda feature called 'nuke from orbit' though...

[-] chromodynamic@piefed.social 1 points 13 hours ago

Good point about the unintentional votes. Maybe just a temporary suspension then.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Aug 2025
58 points (100.0% liked)

PieFed Meta

1381 readers
13 users here now

Discuss PieFed project direction, provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics.

Wiki

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS