149
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] geekworking@lemmy.world 97 points 2 years ago

Male drivers get your discrimination lawsuits ready for your lost income.

[-] nix@merv.news 23 points 2 years ago

Did you even read the article? How would women drivers deciding they want more women and nb passengers cause male drivers to lose income…

How is this the most upvoted comment

[-] qooqie@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

Next they should add white people to be able to get only white drivers to make them comfortable! /s It’s obviously sexist and not a real solution to their issues

[-] flumph@programming.dev 12 points 2 years ago

Your comment makes no sense given the details provided in the article. The toggle runs a gender-based sort on available passengers when a driver indicates they're ready to pick up a new passenger.

  • Male driver, without this toggle, indicates they're ready for a passenger? All waiting passengers are sorted by current algorithms.
  • Female+ driver, with this toggle off, indicates they're ready for a passenger? All waiting passengers are sorted by current algorithms.
  • Female+ driver, with this toggle on, indicates they're ready for a passenger? All waiting passengers are sorted by gender then current algorithms.

At no point does the pool of available passengers for male drivers decrease.

[-] malloc@lemmy.world 78 points 2 years ago

This idea of feeling safe is causing us to regress as a society. This “feature” is just discrimination wrapped in a nice sounding name — “Women Plus Connect” and UI.

We used to be able to identify the predators in our communities and do some sort of action: jail them, shame them, beat them up, whatever. Now we are using fear of them to perpetuate discrimination and AVOID them.

[-] michaelrose@lemmy.ml 37 points 2 years ago

We were historically terrible at identifying predators and mostly let them alone to victimize or if their victims were less important destroyed victims lives as a matter of course leading to wide scale silence by victims.

We have less crime by far and prosecute more scumbags than we did 50 years ago.

Communities "handling" bad folks by individual violence never worked worth a shit because communities have always cared about whose more important than who is right and it doesn't meaningfully scale which is why it never worked worth a shit it real life.

In order to deal with shit heads you have to have a dispassionate authority whose job it is to prosecute shit heads who isn't politically bound to give a shit about your penny ante local bullshit and the expectation that local yokels will properly do their job and push shit up the food chain or be held accountable.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] flumph@programming.dev 21 points 2 years ago

The actual numbers speak for themselves and the clear motivation for this feature.

About 91% of the victims of rape were riders and about 7% of the victims were drivers. Women made up 81% of the victims while men comprised about 15%

Uber releases safety data: 998 sexual assault incidents including 141 rape reports in 2020

Women Plus were 85% of the victims. This is despite the "ways" Uber has implemented to increase safety.

[-] 5BC2E7@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

That’s half of the story the breakdown of drivers and riders would make it look even worse (i am assuming most drivers are actually male)

[-] iforgotmyinstance@lemmy.world 74 points 2 years ago

So what I dislike about this is that the driver is the one choosing. If the customer was placing their preference, and then Lyft agrees to attempt to place them with their preference (for a surcharge of course, priority service shouldn't be free) that would be something I could get behind. Letting drivers flat refuse service to someone based solely on their gender sounds like opening the doors to discrimination suits.

[-] philodendron@lemdro.id 11 points 2 years ago

Conceptually, sure. But I imagine it’d be a potential lawsuit over workplace discrimination. Especially if the female drivers are being paid more for the same service.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dsmk@lemmy.zip 58 points 2 years ago

Since users choose their gender in the app, this has some potential to be used for more nefarious purposes, no?

Not a big fan of discriminatory options like this, btw.

[-] glimse@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago

Wouldn't need it at all if rideshare drivers stopped sexually assaulting passengers

[-] dsmk@lemmy.zip 8 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Can't really comment on that as in my city (not US) to drive for these companies you need a license. To get the license, they perform background checks, check your criminal record, ask for medical approval, etc, every time you have to renew it, and all this seems to stop a lot of bad stuff. Not saying it doesn't happen - you can't never completely stop it - but there are ways to reduce it.

Anyway, they could just allow customers to select their preferred gender, would make anyone that wants to use such option happy, and we wouldn't even have to talk about discrimination.

[-] otter@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 years ago

They'd need a toggle for the feature on the rider side as well. Like "hide my gender"

[-] AnonTwo@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

I'd assume if you get legal action thrown at you though, it'd be a lot harder to deny if you also were picking a gender to get specific drivers.

[-] dsmk@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Legal action for picking the "wrong" option in an app? Also, "I'm gender fluid, your honor", so good luck proving anything.

By "nefarious purposes" I meant serious stuff. Some deranged fuck decides to kill (edit: a certain gender) and there's not much you can do after they point a gun or put a knife to the driver's neck. It's too late by then.

I don't know, I understand their intention, but it seems to have some flaws.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] flumph@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

Explain how sorting the list of available passengers by gender is discrimination? It's being rolled out in huge metropolitan markets so there will be enough drivers for everyone to get one.

[-] bou@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

@flumph if they allowed sorting the list by race, instead of by gender... would you understand how it's discrimination, then?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] dsmk@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 years ago

The option allows customers to prioritize drivers from two of their 3 gender groups: "female" and "non-binary". One group is left out and if you happen to be in that group, you'll end up doing less trips, making less money.

I wouldn't be happy with a setting to prioritize "male", so you can see why I'm not happy with a setting that prioritizes "female" and "non-binary". You either give the customer the option to prioritize any gender or you don't.

Since they can't verify one's gender, the potential for abuse is there. A customer could prioritise these groups if they wanted to target them and the driver could also pick one of these genders if they wanted to have people of said gender in their car.

[-] flumph@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

The option allows customers to prioritize drivers...

Nope, it doesn't. The feature is for drivers, not passengers.

[-] ChrislyBear@lemmy.world 44 points 2 years ago

So as a driver I have now a filter for better rape and murder victims? Nice!

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

I assume they’ll probably check with the gender people put on their drivers licenses or something.

[-] dsmk@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 years ago

Are they checking the customers too? If not, it seems to be an easy way for some weirdos to go around targetting genders they don't like.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] snooggums@kbin.social 15 points 2 years ago

Wow, this thread is a bunch of people spouting an updated version of the "men in women's bathrooms is gonna lead to rape" bullshit.

[-] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Step 0: Be the sort of scum that would assault a lyft driver
Step 1: Set your identity to non binary as a rider
Step 2: Dress in a way to appear non-binary, even a little bit. Honestly just painting your nails purple and wearing thick glasses is probably enough to not raise suspicion. Most people wont try and question this and interrogate you over it. If they do, filter them off and be a normal rider.
Step 3: If they don't question it, congrats, Lyft has no just done the work of assisting you with finding your next victim, great job Lyft!

Bonus round~!

  1. Be a nazi
  2. Do steps 1-3 above
  3. Set your destination to be somewhere vaguely secluded where your fellow nazi friends are lying in wait.
  4. Congrats, Lyft has now successfully routed a non-binary identifying person directly into you and your nazi friend's clutches, great job lyft!
[-] snooggums@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

So people who haven't been doing that already are going to suddenly go out of their way using steps that will show obvious intent during future prosecution?

[-] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

"Already" It's a new feature, so no one is doing it already.

[-] snooggums@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

They haven't been abusing drivers already.

Yes, targeting could conceivably make it easier but it was already possible.

[-] pixxelkick@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

targeting could conceivably make it easier but it was already possible.

I agree...

You understand this is the entire point of what I wrote though, right? That in an effort to try and make lyft safer, they have effectively done the exact opposite and literally made it easier for abusers to target victims.

[-] mojo@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago

Wow good way to make the women feel incredibly unsafe and easily targeted.

[-] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

I look forward to seeing the same people suing over bathroom access doing the mental gymnastics to sue over this.

[-] tfw_no_toiletpaper@feddit.de 4 points 2 years ago

Wasn't there a BoJack horseman episode almost exactly like this lmao

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Yeah, this will end up just as well I'm assuming

[-] fsmacolyte@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

John Wayne Gacy is really unhappy with this feature.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 2 years ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Choosing this will “increase their chances of matching with women and nonbinary drivers,” according to this blog post from Lyft.

If someone goes through the steps to change their gender in the app, we are going to assume that is how they identify,” Audrey Liu, Executive Vice President/Head of Design at Lyft, said in a statement.

“Inclusivity is a core value at Lyft and we are committed to creating a community in which riders and drivers feel as though they are included and belong.”

Lyft says this feature has been highly requested and will give women and nonbinary people more control over both the driving and riding experience.

Currently, that demographic accounts for less than a quarter of Lyft drivers, which is comparable with the rest of the rideshare industry, according to a report by Gridwise.

Those in launch cities can download the latest version of the Lyft app starting tomorrow, Sept. 13th to access the feature.


The original article contains 478 words, the summary contains 157 words. Saved 67%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
149 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

73534 readers
2894 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS