62
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] pinheadednightmare@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago

Easy fix here…. Stop allowing corporations to own single family homes.

[-] canihasaccount@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

Most of the problem is not driven by corporations:

Investors owing between one and five properties account for 85% of investor-owned homes, and those owning between six and 10 properties account for another 5%, bringing the total share of small investor-owned homes to about 90%.

It's boomers.

[-] Wazowski@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago

Just fucking tax non-owner-occupied at 200% market value per year.

[-] karashta@sopuli.xyz 8 points 5 days ago

Fuck that. No one needs or deserves to have multiple homes when there are homeless people.

Make multiple home ownership illegal.

Make it illegal for homes and dwellings to be an investment vehicle for wealth.

[-] taiyang@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

Free market would just keep going since rent is just free money for corpos and even without rent, value is property always goes up.

Unfortunately, unless you get progressives in both state Congress and the governership, nothing will happen. Californian Dems are generally neolibs, and literally no one seems to pay any attention to any position aside from the governership.

this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2025
62 points (100.0% liked)

Economy

1580 readers
1 users here now

Lemmy Community for economy, business, politics, stocks, bonds, product releases, IPOs, advice, news, investment, videos, predictions, government, money, politics, debate, current trends and more.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS