65
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] million@lemmy.world 15 points 4 days ago

What is clear doing that is unique and what are the trade offs?

Why isn’t this mainstreamed into other distros?

[-] Pumasuedeblue@sh.itjust.works 19 points 4 days ago

Clear Linux was maintained by Intel and specifically tuned to Intel hardware. The speed enhancement it has over other distros is only possible on a very limited set of hardware.

[-] Fuck_u_spez_@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 hours ago

Do you know where I can find a list of that hardware?

[-] million@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

Interesting - is that kernel level thing? Could other distros use that on the right hardware or is too much to maintain multiple kernels that are that hardware specific?

[-] Oinks 11 points 4 days ago

The mentioned performance governor runs the CPU permanently at maximum frequency, which is obviously bad on battery powered devices and on devices with lacking thermal headroom. I think it might cause problems in virtualized environments as well but I'm not sure about that.

[-] _hovi_@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

Ubuntu 25.04 on this server defaults to the intel_cpufreq scaling driver with the "schedutil" governor. Ubuntu still frustratingly defaults to schedutil or powersave governors even on servers... A rather silly default many will argue.

Seems like this accounts for most of the difference from their charts, but still, cool

[-] 17lifers@sopuli.xyz 2 points 4 days ago

what a good improvement

this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
65 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

8676 readers
237 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS