Some ideas about Carney's reform of the civil service (lemmy.ca)

submitted 6 days ago by CloudwalkingOwl@lemmy.ca to c/canadapolitics@lemmy.ca

9 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I've pulled together an article that brings together two very different thinkers talking about issues of relevance to the Prime Minister's reform of the civil service.

https://open.substack.com/pub/billhulet/p/carneys-quest-to-reform-the-bureaucracy?r=4ot1q2&showWelcomeOnShare=true

all 10 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] patatas@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago

Here's a question: if it's so easy to find 15% waste or BS jobs in every government department, then why not keep funding on the same trajectory, and leverage these apparently obvious paths to efficiency to drastically improve the quality of programs and services?

Why is the 'solution' seemingly always to cut funding?

[-] CloudwalkingOwl@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 days ago

In general you make a good point. I suppose in some cases it would be possible to cut costs and increase service.

Unfortunately, Carney is committed to dramatically increase spending but not taxation. I don't know much about how he views things like wealth stratification but as someone who has been involved in politics I do know politicians have to support crazy stuff to get elected.

We were in a nasty place before the last election and stuck having to choose between Carney and Milhouse while the orange goof threatened our existence. As I said in the article, I don't know what Carney wants or plans on doing, but I do believe we should expect more from our civil services and I don't think the real problem is lack of funds.

[-] patatas@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 days ago

Carney did not run on tripling the military budget, nor did he run on slashing 15% from the public service.

He didn't run on cancelling the DST, nor cutting the CBC.

Those facts alone should be enough to oppose these cuts just on principle.

And we don't have a US electoral system. We did not "choose between Carney and [Poilievre]", we elected local MPs. Carney didn't have to "support crazy stuff to get elected", because ha's not dependent on multi-million-dollar dark money PAC funding.

Anyway, you didn't really address my question.

[-] foxglove@lazysoci.al 2 points 6 days ago

This sounds a bit related to David Graeber's concept of "Bullshit Jobs".

[-] DriftingLynx@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago

More than just a bit.

The article opens with:

I just finished reading the late David Graeber’s book Bullshit Jobs and it’s got me thinking about the reforms to the civil service that Prime Minister Carney has been promising.

[-] Varen21Sirtek69@discuss.online 1 points 5 days ago

If you cannot name your job in one word - maybe 2 if you're lucky, You have a bullshit job. (Ie pilot, cop, engineer, teacher, doctor). Actually typing out "Senior Director of Enterprise Accomplishment Developer Engagement" on LinkedIn is LOL.

[-] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 days ago

Marine Hydraulic technician/ Ship repair mechanic. Ptfo with that bullshit.

[-] Varen21Sirtek69@discuss.online 1 points 5 days ago

So "mechanic" is the actual answer. Good job

[-] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 days ago

Oh, so you're that sort of ignorant.

this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2025

31 points (100.0% liked)

CanadaPolitics

2872 readers

2 users here now

Placeholder for any r/CanadaPolitics refugees

Rules

Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

lightrush@lemmy.ca

grte@lemmy.ca