67
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ook@discuss.tchncs.de 65 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"The pay-TV provider suffered damage in the millions as a result," the ZCB announced without providing further details. The content providers speak of high revenue losses due to piracy on an "industrial scale".

Natürlich. Jeder hätte auf jeden Fall das legale Angebot abonniert, gäbe es da nicht diesen illegalen Service. Klar, macht Sinn. Gibt auf keinen Fall die Möglichkeit, dass die Leute dann einfach nichts abonnieren, natürlich nicht, nein.

Edit: sorry, didn't realise this might be an English community. Just wrote sarcastically that obviously everyone who subscribed to the illegal service will now certainly go for the legal alternative. Which is why it totally makes sense to mark these as lost revenue. Absolutely not possible that people might just no subscribe to the legal service, nope.

[-] Hirom@beehaw.org 10 points 1 day ago
[-] Kissaki@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

At least when it's not exact numbers like here, it could be "10% is still millions". But obviously, I doubt that's their calculation. It usually is the nonsense "full" calc.

[-] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The damage is calculaded like this, because those who've used the streaming service to watch a movie would have needed to purchase some form of a licence to do so legally. It's not a question of whether they would have had the money or the willing to do so. It's the same like someone would sneak into a cinema and watch a movie. They usually would be required to purchase a ticket to do so. The damage is not a question of whether they would have had the money for that or wouldn't have went to the cinema if purchasing a ticket was necessary.

[-] Kissaki@feddit.org 9 points 1 day ago

This is mainly an issue of the terms damage and loss being overloaded with different meanings.

If the act of unlicensed access comes at no distribution or access cost to the creator and publisher, then it's a different kind of damage than if you damage or steal physical property. Stealing from the official distribution channel may incur cost.

All of these are unrelated to production cost and right to [controlled] distribution.

When a car is stolen from a car dealership, their property is lost. They can no longer sell it. Digital content however, is copyable and distributable at marginal cost, whether it is accessed in other instances without a license or not.

This discrepancy is what leads to these very different views and comments of damage not being real damage. They have not "lost" anything after all. They still own the product and the rights. You can argue about forms of loss, but it's undeniable that they still have these.

[-] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago

Of course, yes.

[-] ook@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 day ago

You basically wrote what I did, but from a different viewpoint.

Your example with the cinema is also a typical apple and oranges example comparing a digital distribution with a physical service. Yes, when you sneak into a cinema the cinema provider is losing revenue because you take a seat someone else might have paid for. So at some point the cinema is full and cannot accommodate any more people that paid which would prompt the provider to check tickets.

There is no such scenario for digital distribution. You are not taking anyone's space. The provider can sell their product infinitely often. You even already pay for the traffic you cause with your internet connection. It is a very different situation but is always equated because online piracy is of course the worst problem ever.

[-] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago

There is no such scenario for digital distribution.

The whole point it that content has been consumed without purchasing a proper licence.

[-] ook@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 day ago

No, the point is that just because you pirated it, it doesn't mean you would have paid for the content if there were no way to pirate it.

[-] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

From the legal pov that simply does not matter at all.

[-] ook@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago

Yes, you almost got it. Well done. I'll leave you with that.

[-] crimeschneck@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I agree, but you broke rule 1 of this community (English language only)

Edit: I wrote the comment before I saw your edit.

[-] 30p87@feddit.org 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Four germans meet in a comment section on Lemmy.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
We have no humour.

[-] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

That battle station looks radical!

[-] Kissaki@feddit.org 7 points 1 day ago

Towels right next to it for when the CPUs are sweating too much

[-] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

And bottle of water on top of the racks… scary

[-] daddycool@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

That's in case of the servers overheating and catching fire. The fire will melt the plastic bottles and poor water on the fire. Trust me, I'm an engineer.

[-] cyrano@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 23 hours ago

I see, DIY fire sprinklers.

this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2025
67 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

6703 readers
549 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS