7
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by sekxpistol@feddit.uk to c/greenparty@feddit.uk
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago

If she’s not a spoiler, why doesn’t she run in Democratic primaries? Or non-battleground states? Or run down ballot candidates?

[-] sekxpistol@feddit.uk 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Jill Stein and the Green Party don’t run in Democratic primaries because they aren’t Democrats. They're an independent party with fundamentally different positions, like rejecting corporate donations, opposing U.S. imperialism, and pushing for ecological socialism. Entering a Democratic primary would mean compromising those values and legitimizing a party structure they believe is corrupt and undemocratic.

As for non-battleground states, Stein does run in all 50 states, including so-called safe ones. But focusing only on those would write off millions of voters who live in swing states and want more than two options. It’s not the Green Party’s job to preserve the illusion of choice between two corporate-funded candidates. It’s the major parties’ job to earn votes.

And they do run down-ballot candidates. The Green Party has had hundreds of local officeholders over the years: school boards, city councils, water districts, etc. In 2022 alone, Greens ran over 100 candidates nationwide. Just because CNN doesn’t cover them doesn’t mean they aren’t doing the work.

The spoiler argument assumes votes belong to the Democrats by default. They don’t. People don’t owe their votes to anyone. If major parties want those votes, they should represent those voters—not just expect obedience.

If every single person who voted third party would have instead voted for Harris, Trump still would have won. Harris didn't lose because of the Green Party, or any other third party. More people didn't vote than who voted third party. So how is that in anyway a spoiler?

[-] Railing5132@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Jill Stein needs to read the Rubles on the wall and get packing.

[-] sekxpistol@feddit.uk 1 points 2 weeks ago

You still mad? She wasn't the reason you all lost the election! lol

[-] Railing5132@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Whether she was or wasn't (I made no argument either way, you feeling defensive?), she is a lousy candidate that emerges like Punxsutawney Phil, only once every 4 years to do whatever the Kremlin tells her to do. She's a willing asset and the Greens either can't or won't see that.

[-] sekxpistol@feddit.uk 1 points 2 weeks ago

Not defensive, but I thought that's why you weirdly referring to rubles. Why would she worry about rubles? She's talking about how much a 2-party system sucks in the US. Which does suck by the way.

[-] ajmaxwell@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

What's with the post title? It's not the title of the article nor does it reflect the article's content.

[-] sekxpistol@feddit.uk 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Updated. Mixed up the articles in my newsfeed.

this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2025
7 points (100.0% liked)

Green Party

88 readers
1 users here now

News about the Green Party. U.S. and International versions.

No name calling. No misinformation. Stay on topic. No trolling.

Be kind. Stay positive

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS