6
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 26 points 1 month ago
[-] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Is the sentence hard to understand?

[-] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

its just hard to understand how something so stupid can be said

The Wiki page defines ETHICS as

Ethics is the philosophical study of moral phenomena. Also called moral philosophy, it investigates normative questions about what people ought to do or which behavior is morally right.

What you are doing is anthropomorphizing science. Science is a method system for understanding nature.

And without ethics in science, we get nightmare bastardization of science.

[-] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

its just hard to understand how something so stupid can be said

It's especially funny when you read OP's profile bio:

Nowadays everybody wants to talk like they got something to say but nothing comes out when they move their lips just a bunch of gibberish.

[-] JASN_DE@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago

That doesn't mean his post is false though.

[-] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 1 month ago

It absolutely proves his post false.

load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

You just lumped all of “science” together. Even the science of documenting birdsong?

[-] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Can you tell me what goes in to the Science of birdsong? I am unfamiliar with the field and expect you to be able to give me a detailed response on what goes in to it as it is your example.

[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

No thanks, this is too shallow of a shower thought.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] maxwells_daemon@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

It's not hard to understand, despite being badly formulated, it's just very questionable.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] tkk13909@sopuli.xyz 21 points 1 month ago

And scientific study is unethical... How?

[-] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

Scientific study is by nature unethical because one must do unethical things in it's pursuit. We have ethical frameworks around Scientific Study for a reason, and it isn't because it was doing fine without those frameworks.

[-] Nefara@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

Ah yes, everyone knows how famously unethical astronomers are, they should respect the privacy and consent of supernovas. Filthy perverts peeping on those innocent stars!

[-] Coopr8@kbin.earth 4 points 1 month ago

My brother, how many examples do you need? Without mentioning the 30s and 40s, look at the Tuskegee Experiment where men were given syphilis intentionally and withheld treatment to study it's spread in black populations. Or the San Francisco Operation Sea-Spray when dangerous bacterial were sprayed over the entire city to study it's effects on the population. Ethical frameworks exist to prevent people from harming others in the pursuit of data, because if they aren't prevented they will. I order to prevent this harm from being done, a clearly defined set of principles must be stated and written down so that everyone involved can have the same understanding when designing and approving studies.

[-] tkk13909@sopuli.xyz 20 points 1 month ago

Yes. Those are examples of science being done unethically. Science itself is a process that is ethically neutral so it can be used in both good and bad ways. That doesn't make it unethical by nature like the original post claims it is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Nefara@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

Why do you think that asking questions, making a hypothesis, testing that hypothesis and writing down the results is unethical?

[-] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Why do you think the context of the testing doesn't matter?

[-] Nefara@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

You said "science", not any specific type or category of study, so if you mean a specific school of science is unethical you should make that distinction.

[-] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Yes, because context matters. Exceptions don't make the rule, and speaking generally about things is allowed when they are related.

If you want to get into the semantics feel free. My statement is broad because it is a "shower thought".

This isn't debate club.

[-] Acamon@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

This isn't debate club.

If people aren't suppose to discuss and possibly disagree, why post? What do you think is the purpose of the showerthoughts community?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Nefara@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Yes, because context matters. Exceptions don't make the rule, and speaking generally about things is allowed when they are related.

So what is the exception here? You said, and I quote, "science is by nature unethical". So you're saying any experimental methodology in any school of science exploring any number of completely benign things is somehow unethical.

This isn't debate club.

I see you're new to the internet.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 month ago

Found the psychopathic scientist!

[-] MissJinx@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

Don't excuse a Nazi with mental disorders. Who do you think a person like this would choose to be unethical with? his parents? No probably the people he hates.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Gold_E_Lox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 1 month ago

this is like the shit i would say when i was 12, i am assuming the same about you

[-] Arkouda@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

When you assume you make an ass out of you and me.

[-] MissJinx@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

This is some Josef Mengele type of shit. Hope you like the tropical sun

[-] JASN_DE@feddit.org 6 points 1 month ago

To the pure science itself yes, but not to the larger environment resp. individuals. That's why there are usually checks in place.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
6 points (100.0% liked)

Showerthoughts

36400 readers
356 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS