50
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] codexarcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 week ago

How can sole maintainers work with multi-billion corporations without being taken advantage of?

They can't, thats why GPL is noncommercial. Capitalism is an exploitative system that relies on power imbalance. As soon as MS reached out, he should have made it clear they can't even look at his code for ideas without a contract and payment. He shouldn't have told them anything else without a contract. Papers with legal claims on them are the only language business speaks.

[-] woelkchen@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

GPL isn't non-commercial. Non-commercial licenses are explicitly against the free software and open sources definitions by both FSF and OSI.

[-] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 5 points 1 week ago

I think they meant it doesn't have broad commercial appeal. Which is somewhat true.

[-] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

AGPLv3 is the only way to go. If you want to make open source software, you need a license that protects your project and your users from corporate abuse.

[-] Suoko@feddit.it 19 points 1 week ago

I'm almost sure they steal ideas that people write in teams chat too..

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

Did they steal your idea for an AI bot that places UberEats orders for Chipotle?

Sorry, bro ๐Ÿ˜”

[-] Kowowow@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago

Hey maybe i can get microsoft steal my idea for a service that combines local radio news with spotify/podcasts

[-] Suoko@feddit.it 3 points 6 days ago

I would also try to let them steal the current idea of European countries to stop using HW and SW solutions made in US, and switch to locally provided services. We'd avoid having around the globe those strange billionaires semi-tech bots

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

This came out a while ago. The developer used a license that said, "Steal this software, I don't care." Then he was shocked Pikachu when it was stolen.

His problem is the exact reason GPL was created.

[-] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 17 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

The license does not allow removing the original license and purport that the code was created by someone else. It looks as if large parts of the project were copied directly from Spegel without any mention of the original source.

this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
50 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

8223 readers
285 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system

Also check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS