812
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] scutiger@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago

What a monster! Making the lives of people better, like a maniac!

[-] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 11 points 16 hours ago

That's some poor propaganda, comrade fox news. You should've rendered it in Arabic or Chinese to scare them out

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 18 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

This is the future that those who are controlling the conservative platform are trying to prevent.

Make no mistake this is and always will be a class war about stealing the value of workers for their own personal gain.

[-] WiseScorpio@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

Democrat leadership is also not happy with Mamdani. He isn't following the rules, like David Hogg, or AOC.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Fuck the establishment Democratic Party reps, run them all out of office because they will never get it. We need a new deal not conservative appeasement.

[-] WiseScorpio@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

100%

Democrat leadership is tepid dogwater

[-] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 29 points 21 hours ago

Americans will just go "this guy wants to instate free healthcare, cleanse police corruption, and to stop bombing the middle east!" and expect you to reel back in disgust.

[-] Wilco@lemm.ee 11 points 20 hours ago

Because their MAGAt base will in fact reel back in disgust if any of those things are proposed. If "the libs" want it, then MAGA is programmed to hate it.

See how the fox piece looks? It has the politicians face, then they let MAGA know the guy is a "lib", likely with the set up talking points. That is all MAGAts need, a face and to know the person is on the other side ... from there anything else mentioned about the person is automatically bad.

[-] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

In 3 years Fox news will just show a picture of the political opponent's face with the caption "this guy is a lib" which will send every MAGAt into a murderous rage

[-] Wilco@lemm.ee 4 points 14 hours ago

I remember seeing video of a MAGAt rally. Trump vs. Biden election. They had a picture of Hillary up on the screen while the MAGATs chanted "lock her up". I didn't get it. She wasn't running ... it made no sense.

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 14 hours ago

Like Emmanuel Goldstein in 1984

[-] Jesusaurus@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

I'm just envisioning it like a John Wick style contract being issued when Fox News does the bit and every magat's phone starts going off with the notification... I don't want this timeline...

[-] MutilationWave@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 19 hours ago

In this case all they needed to know he's bad is to hear his name unfortunately.

[-] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

Groupthink is a real thing

and its evolved over the last few decades.

[-] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 1 points 11 hours ago

Fox News saw the two minutes of hate and thought "why only two minutes?"

[-] freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

I'm seriously shocked the Fox media team didn't bother photoshopping horns on his head, distorting his pleasant, lovely smile into a menacing grimace, or altering his skin color into the brimstone-red spectrum.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 35 points 1 day ago

Here's how I think they see this:

Landlords will go out of business. For-profit grocery stores will go out of business. People I don't know won't suffer (there's even more letters at the end and I don't know what they mean; that scares me). Businesses will have to pay more to operate, therefore prices will rise for me to protect profits. Brown people will still be where I have to see and interact with them.

Conservatives are fearful. They think when someone gets something good, it's by taking from them. Fuck 'em.

[-] tfm@europe.pub 10 points 1 day ago

Brown people will still be where I have to see and interact with them.

They don't even try to hide their racism anymore.

[-] kerrigan778 14 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Hi I'm a socialist transit worker and I thought free bus fare was a no brainer until I worked in transit, it's an awful idea. Transit cannot function effectively as transit when it is being forced to operate as a mobile shelter and bottle and wagon transit system. Fund shelters and ease the burden shouldered by transit.

(By all means make transit incredibly inexpensively accessible to anyone who needs it)

I apparently wasn't clear enough here, I'm sure there are places where free transit works great because people are so well cared for and general safety is so high that it's not an issue. That sounds wonderful, I want that here. However, I have learned the hard way that transit needs to continue being accessible to the majority even when there are people who have slipped fully into the margins who present hazards to transit customers. (Customers meaning people who need transit to travel)

[-] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 23 points 20 hours ago

Point blank, that is not an issue caused by free transit. This is the logical equivalent of saying the school system is broken because people keep showing up to them with guns.

[-] kerrigan778 6 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Point blank, the inability to deny people entry to transit and to use transit as a mobile shelter is having catastrophic impacts on overall transit use. This is the equivalent of saying the school system is broken because people keep showing up at schools and screaming at people, assaulting people, soiling themselves and the facilities and the staff have no ability to separate them or remove them from the school, so the rest of the students get home schooled or private schooled and effectively don't have access to public school. (Oh yeah, and tons of teachers and staff quit)

They need HELP and a transit system as a shelter and drug safe use space is just about the least efficient way I can imagine to help them and makes it less safe and accessible to everyone else.

[-] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 9 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

You can care and advocate for more than one thing, just so you know. Housing someone is less tax money on you personally than keeping them on the street costs and there are more empty living spaces than there are folks without a home.

But, go ahead and villainize the people with nowhere to go and no other option, they're definitely the problem, aren’t they?

Edit: You’re literally just bitching about your job and asking for this to not affect you personally. That’s a shitty as fuck take on the situation.

[-] kerrigan778 6 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

I feel like you didn't actually read what I wrote. I ABSOLUTELY WANT THEM TO BE HOUSED AND CARED FOR. I am in no way villainizing them, this situation is not their fault. The reason we have a giant crisis of homelessness and drug use is not because we "let them". The system needs to be fixed so that population can be helped and the numbers falling into that are cut. In the meantime though, we are doing nothing and it doesn't work!

[-] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

This is specifically a post about doing something. Notice that first box of words in the picture?

[-] kerrigan778 5 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Yes... I was in favor of a lot of it... I was trying to educate people that there is more to the issue of free bus fare. Because I'm a transit worker who used to think free bus fare was a no brainer, but now believe it is unworkable without FIRST significantly improving other issues.

[-] camelbeard@lemmy.world 24 points 21 hours ago

Luxemburg has a great free transit system, what you guys need it to deal with homeless people and drug addicts. I mean this in a humanly way, where these people get the help they need.

[-] kerrigan778 9 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Couldn't agree more, a system where the number of homeless drug addicts and marginalized people is so low that we literally don't need to worry about it sounds much better. But in the meantime the people who aren't using the bus as a shelter have a civil right to access to safe and effective transit as well that they are currently not getting and transit is dying because of it. I have no illusions on the ways in which society has failed these people, they are largely foster kids who aged out of the system and people who were only a little on the margins but functional until rent went up AGAIN and they literally couldn't afford to have a place to live anymore and spiraled from there. Free transit won't fix that though, the interim period where free transit doesn't function is very real and valid.

Also, seriously though, Luxembourg conservatively has less than a twentieth the poverty rate as the US.

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 8 points 20 hours ago

well duh. that's not a transit issue, that's a shelter issue.

[-] kerrigan778 4 points 19 hours ago

Agreed, the problem comes when the issue gets pushed from the shelter system onto the transit system.

[-] aceshigh@lemmy.world 6 points 20 hours ago

Staten Island (the forgotten borough) has a free subway. It works pretty well.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bytesonbike@discuss.online 33 points 1 day ago

Look at this monster.

[-] bytesonbike@discuss.online 25 points 1 day ago

You know they're mad

[-] shplane@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago

Yes but many of these would require taxing the rich, which I’m against because I might somehow become rich one day through virtually no effort or understanding of how one becomes rich to begin with

/s

[-] Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago

That's it right there. Just mentioning the phrase tax the rich has become enough of a catalyst for the punching down to intensify. Keep the pressure on.

[-] Sumocat@lemmy.world 146 points 1 day ago

Access to food, transportation, housing, it’s almost like he thinks the job of government is providing decent infrastructure.

[-] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 1 day ago

Or "insur[ing] domestic Tranquility,...promot[ing] the general welfare." The Founding Fathers are spinning in their graves.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] drmoose@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Its crazy that NYC still can't afford free public transportation. City literally has more expensive apartments than yearly cost of operating busses.

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 21 hours ago

The point is you need pretext to remove people who use the system as a living room instead of transit.

[-] drmoose@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago

Sure but why would a fee do that? If anything that would encourage this behavior because if I pay 2$ I feel entitled to spend there as much time as I want.

This is pretty well established theory now in behavior economy:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motivation_crowding_theory

We already invented the most effective and humane fix for this - social workers. I don't think anything can work better then another person trained in handling social situations correcting the issue themselves.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.dbzer0.com 82 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

People act like $30/hr is high. Note this would be the mayor of NYC, so it would be raised for NYC only if he got his way. The cheapest place you can get to live on your own there I am finding is 2600 a month. So say you made 30/hr. That's $62,400 working 40 hours a week. Take out Federal/state/city taxes ends up being around $46,112 take home. The place costed $31,200. Making the lowest rent findable in Manhattan 2/3 of $30/hr.

They wouldn't be able to get approved to even live there if they tried. They would have to rent a room from someone else with a 4 bedroom place renting to 4 people for around $1200/ month. And share bathrooms/kitchen/living space with people. And they would still struggle to get by if they paid for health insurance, travel costs to and from work, food, and the whole living crap.

$30 isn't radical for NYC, it's like base needed salary... And hope you have a good stable relationship with someone else making the same, then maybe you can get your own place together, just don't do something stupid like get pregnant because you can't afford to not go to work, and can't afford to put them in daycare so you would both have to uproot and move real quick finding jobs elsewhere.

[-] crumbguzzler5000@feddit.org 20 points 1 day ago

Wait, we are gonna vote for a guy who is going to make renting a room more affordable?! COMMUNISM!! I WONT STAND FOR SUCH LUXURY LIVING CONDITIONS! /s

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 53 points 1 day ago

Jesus would NEVER Approve of ANY of these! AFFORDABLE housing? Jesus would BURN it to The Ground! PROTECTING your Neighbor? LAUGHABLE! This is the MOST Anti Jesus Platform EVER! Where's the ELIMINATING Healthcare? Where's the ELIMINATING Homes? Where's the HURTING your Neighbors? Where's the JESUS!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2025
812 points (100.0% liked)

Political Humor

1226 readers
867 users here now

Welcome to Political Humor!

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS