65
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ZoteTheMighty@midwest.social 15 points 2 days ago

Kind of amazing that Steam is a 32 bit-only program on Linux, and everyone is making the Fedora project out to be the bad guy here somehow.

[-] kieron115@startrek.website 2 points 1 day ago

Wouldn't the alternative be losing a LOT of old games on Steam?

[-] ZoteTheMighty@midwest.social 8 points 1 day ago

There should be nothing wrong with a 64 bit program launching a 32 bit program. If anything, it sounds like Valve is using that as some sort of "comparability insurance"; if you can run steam, you can run almost all games on steam.

[-] kieron115@startrek.website 5 points 1 day ago

MacOS stopped supporting 32-bit with Catalina and, according to appleinsider.com, older games won't work on Catalina at all.

[-] rdri@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

That must be on MacOS programmers. See WOW64.

[-] fluckx@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Bazzite shutting down would be tragic ( for me ). I've been quite happy with it. Slowly convincing people to switch. Bazzite was also a relatively low step compared to fixing them a standard distro as all the stuff they want/need is already readily available.

Telling people I decided to promote another distro because the old one stopped is only going to make me have to restart my efforts with an additional hurdle ( how do you know this one won't stop ).

I tried a few distros. But I didn't like garuda very much, nobara was okay'ish. Bazzite really clicked for some reason, despite needing a bit of getting used to.

I'd hate to go distro hunting again. Or try and update cpu schedulers and not brick the whole system.

[-] littleomid@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago

Maybe don’t chase the FOTM distro and go for one of those who have stood the test of time?

[-] fluckx@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Would I be in this situation if I took fedora, a distro that has withstood the test of time? Yes.

Bazzite being fairly new is completely besides the point.

Bazzite and the rest of universal Blue would rather call them a custom install of Fedora rather than a distro IIRC.

[-] IEatDaFeesh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Oh no!

Moves to other Fedora based distro

Anyway.

[-] Eyck_of_denesle@lemmy.zip 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Steamos is based on arch and also immutable. Can't they do something like that. Never liked bazzite cause it was fedora based. I feel like any gaming distro should be arch based and making it immutable would fix the arch breaking fear.

Why is everyone downvoting? It's not really a stupid question when they apparently already tried it.

[-] fluckx@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Apparently they looked at it and had issues and bugs with arch which could not be fixed:

https://www.reddit.com/r/linux_gaming/comments/1lj9oqw/comment/mzkxkz2

[-] theshatterstone54@feddit.uk 14 points 2 days ago

Building a distro is hard. Building a distro on existing architecture like uBlue is easier, but still hard, especially if you want to do it right. I believe uBlue was the right choice. This is just someone over in upstream doing something stupid.

[-] terminhell@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Idk how to feel about this.

this post was submitted on 25 Jun 2025
65 points (100.0% liked)

Linux Gaming

19537 readers
274 users here now

Discussions and news about gaming on the GNU/Linux family of operating systems (including the Steam Deck). Potentially a $HOME away from home for disgruntled /r/linux_gaming denizens of the redditarian demesne.

This page can be subscribed to via RSS.

Original /r/linux_gaming pengwing by uoou.

No memes/shitposts/low-effort posts, please.

Resources

WWW:

Discord:

IRC:

Matrix:

Telegram:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS