565
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/div0@lemmy.dbzer0.com

Hey m@tes, as y'all know, this instance has been anti-corporate GenAI positive since it's creation and as such we've typically allowed such content to be posted freely. However in the last few weeks we've had a bunch of drama from GenAI haters who insist on coming into our comms and starting slap-fights. This caused us to vote on a new rule to have the mandate to clear out this constant friction. This worked to an extent, but I think we can help foster a better community with the larger threadiverse.

One issue a lot of anti-GenAI people keep bringing is that while they can block dedicated comms like !stable_diffusion_art@lemmy.dbzer0.com, they don't have an easy option to avoid GenAI content in random other /0 comms as there's no way to filter it out. This kind of content has been seen to cause a lot of strife, because people complain about its existence, while /0 admins and mods based on the above rule, tend to sanction those complaining. This then causes drama loops with /c/YPTB and /c/FuckAI etc.

There is a good point to be made here that while we don't mind GenAI content in /0, there isn't a reason to not help others avoid it. So we want to institute the following soft rule by now:

Simply tag your posts which consist of primarily GenAI content with the [GenAI] tag in their title. Not only will frontends like Tesseract will natively parse this as a tag and display it accordingly, but people who dislike such content, can simply filter it out of their feeds. Eventually lemmy will add tags which will make this tagging more seamless, but for now a manual tag in the title will suffice.

This rule only applies to posts in non-explicit GenAI comms. The assumption is that people can simply block those comms completely anyway.

As I said, this is a soft rule for now. Soft in the sense that you're not going to be sanctioned for forgetting it, but we hope people will remind you to do so. This is a good-faith attempt by us to co-exist and help others avoid what they don't want to stumble onto, much like [NSFW] tags. So I hope you'll add do a good faith attempt to help us in this. Furthermore, people who come to posts tagged as GenAI explicitly to scold and start slap-fights, will give the admins and easier justification to clean up, since they could have just filtered out that content in the first place.

Cheers

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 75 points 2 weeks ago

Good, AI art fucking sucks.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 18 points 2 weeks ago

I know, those are my favorite use cases 😏

Can I ask what compelled you to join db0 after reading the sidebar? Honestly curious. If I hated AI that much, after seeing the tagline, I would have noped out.

[-] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 weeks ago

I don't think it was a prominent feature when I joined, AI imagery in general wasn't quite as popular or sophisticated at the time. And even if I disagree with that point, it's not a deal breaker and db0 is still far better than many other instances.

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 2 weeks ago

FYI: The "Generate Art" part of the sidebar tagline was there since day 1

[-] Nora@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 weeks ago

As someone who feels similarly about AI art, but joined db0 anyway: I like the other things they got going on and I'm not stupid enough to whine and complain about the one thing I don't like. (I guess, technically this is doing some of that but shut up xD)

It's like if I went to a bar that has a bunch of games in it, and one is a bunch of pool tables or something and I really hate pool, I'm not gonna throw a fuss demanding they remove it? Some people like it even if I think it's not that cool.

[-] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 17 points 2 weeks ago

I like it. That's the thing about art. Some people like it. Some people don't. You don't get to define what is or isn't art for me. I get to define it for me. That's what's so awesome about it.

Also, get used to it. AI isn't ever ever going away. This is just the beginning. So pace your hate.

[-] tocopherol@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 weeks ago

It's fine if people like it, it just gives me a gross and uncomfortable feeling when I see it and makes me sad that one of the first careers killed by AI could be illustrators.

[-] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

This isn’t the first career to get steamrolled by new tech. That’s just how society works: new tools replace old jobs.

Did you feel this bad when factory workers in the Midwest lost jobs to robots and outsourcing? What about when textile machines wiped out jobs in Alabama? Or when electric streetlights put out-of-work the guys who used to light lamps by hand?

Did anyone mourn the bank tellers who lost their jobs to ATMs?

My point is, artists aren’t more special than the folks who came before. Tech changes things. It always has.

I was a professional artist for 35 years, I did design, illustration, layouts for marketing companies. Now AI can do all of that faster and better. A company would be crazy to pay me what I used to make. And you know what? I’m fine with that. I embraced it. I love new tech.

People who still want to paint/illustrate by hand can. People who still wanna buy their stuff can. Probably not full time job doing it anymore. Just like anything else. They are not special. MOST people work at jobs they don't like to pay the bills, then do their passion on the side.

If ya have a family to feed, you don't cry about not getting a job to illustrate the latest Flash comic book or your favorite DnD dungeon guide. You go get a job and put food on the table. And draw on the weekends.

Welcome to life. And we still have it way easier than the generations before us did. I know. Because I'm old. As bad as you think things are now, it's better than when I was coming up.

Until we get UBI, we gotta deal with what we have. But the idiot capitalist duopoly here in the US that Lemmy worships, is very much against UBI, so that's gonna take a while.

Meh, I love AI, so...

[-] Nelots@lemmy.zip 9 points 2 weeks ago

While art will likely never be completely replaced by AI due to passionate people doing it because they want to anyway, the fact that it is becoming less and less viable of a career path is depressing. Far less people will pursue art even as a hobby in a society that requires working and won't pay for art.

I don't think any Midwest factory workers particularly loved their job. There was little passion or soul behind it. Machines are meant to replace menial hard labor, not passion.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] KAtieTot 10 points 2 weeks ago

Can't be art with no artist, just 'generated illustration'

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Mwa@thelemmy.club 59 points 2 weeks ago

That's good I agree with this

[-] whalebiologist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 2 weeks ago

I like gen ai and I think this rule is a nice gesture towards the other side. It's a good practice to cite your sources when you're online anyhow.

[-] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 2 weeks ago

Imagine getting angry at something this trivial.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 22 points 2 weeks ago

I think it's more "imagine getting mad at people using it at all" because the social effects aren't trivial at all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 weeks ago

I mean...

I can imagine how artists struggling to make ends meet might be angry that work they'd spent years learning and honing their skills to produce was and is being crawled by tools made by a bunch of silver-spoon-chomping techbros who are marketing their products to businesses who employ artists as a way to employ less artists, and pay peanuts to those they do hire to wrangle prompts and fix AI mistakes instead of actually getting to make art.

And I can imagine how frustrating it is to see people minimize that struggle when it often benefits oligarchs and C-suite ghouls.

[-] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 weeks ago

This isn't exactly a capitalist tech-bro instance. So while I agree with there being a problem here, the problem is less genai and more about capitalism IMHO.

Which is why it can seem a bit silly to me to go after this instance of all things when it comes to genai.

That said, as always, I think db0's soft rule is a really great good faith effort to be accommodating to others, while staying true to the core of what the instance is about.

So I hope you'll see that part of things and tone it down in kind.

[-] unbanshee@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 weeks ago

Sorry, what exactly do I need to tone down?

Pretty sure this is the first time I've ever commented on the issue here or elsewhere on Lemmy.

I see anti-AI sentiment all over the fediverse, but nothing in the original post that would indicate that these users are exclusively targeting db0 communities, just that the admins here have chosen to address it; and I agree it's a good way to handle the situation.

I think there are good and valuable use cases for AI, including generative AI.

But I also think a lot of the costs are hidden because the tools are free and easy to access, and because those coats often pretty abstract and wide-ranging so as to be difficult to observe, quantify, and attribute to an emerging technology. So I think there are a lot of really valid reasons to question casual use of those tools because they do not exist outside of capitalism.

The point of my earlier post wasn't meant to be that all use of AI is bad or that somebody using it to make a meme or art of their big-titty anime waifu is directly putting artists out of work, but I also don't think that those things are entirely separable, either.

And since I was replying to a user whose comment made a blanket claim implying that casual use of generative AI is trivial, well... no, I don't think it is.

I've done all sorts of art in my life. Sometimes as a job. And it's personally pretty disheartening to see comments like "it just looks like AI, human-made art doesn't look like that" because yes, it sometimes does, even if the poster has never seen human-made art like that.

But I've also spent the last few years watching dozens of friends and former coworkers lose their careers and their livelihoods en masse for no reason other than naked greed.

I think that making art more accessible through AI can be a really cool and pretty liberating thing for a lot of people, but as it's being employed by the big corporate players, it does have big serious negative externalities for working artists and for cultural products writ large, and I think that's worth bringing up.

[-] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 weeks ago

Sorry, what exactly do I need to tone down?

More of a general commentary for the anti-AI folks.

but nothing in the original post that would indicate that these users are exclusively targeting db0 communities

There have been pretty frequent cases of it lately, as db0 is pro ai.

So I think there are a lot of really valid reasons to question casual use of those tools because they do not exist outside of capitalism.

They do, there are many openly created and developed options which can be entirely locally run.

This is an anarchist instance.

This is not the same thing as anarcho-capitalist, which I personally think is nonsensical to include 'anarch' at all in because its just extremist capitalism with corporations rather than states. Its not remotely anarchist, but that's a digression.

This instance is specifically anti-capitalism. And while I understand you are saying you are not running around being anti-AI, the latter 75% of the comment I'm replying to speaks to a capitalism problem, not a genai problem.

There are many people complaining about genai that are just complaining about capitalism. They might be using genai as the context, but the complaint is about capitalism. Just like the majority of your comment.

So the people who are going on db0 communities, complaining about genai (with capitalism as the reason why), well they really aren't paying attention to what the instance is.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Fair, but this happens in EVERY profession. Happened with people who sewed clothes, weavers, photographers (once a camera was on every single phone), now coders, etc. Also very few artists made money anyway. People who like to do art for personal and fun reason, still can.

Source: I used to be a professional artist/graphic artist for a living. I was able to do it for 35 years before I retired last year. It was always a grind, and very few could make it. Even though I was good enough for it to be my only paycheck for most of my career, I still love AI artwork. :)

World changes. People crying about it and "boycotting" lemmy communities because they don't like it won't change anything at all. Not even a little bit.

AI isn't going anywhere, regardless of how mad people on Lemmy are about it. Not only that, but a lot of nerdy stuff they do now like vid games, DnD, etc, already incorporate AI and will continue to do so. I still have contacts in the industry, I know what the marketing departments are doing. Lemmy won't even know what is AI and what isn't.

There are still people here who say "Oh just look at the hands!" Friends, there are lots of ai models that have figured that out.

Marketing teams aren't using ai that looks ai. Most food photos you see are ai. Most graphics you are seeing on vid game covers and ads are ai. Funiture ads are ai. You are already being duped because you think you "know AI" when you see it. Actually, no you don't. You know BAD ai when you see it. Good ai is something that you don't even realize is ai. And it's already everywhere. lmao

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)

I think this is a nice gesture but I also think it's way too charitable for the Anti-GenAI people currently complaining. Their issue isn't that they want to avoid it, they want to stamp it out, they want it gone. They're not going to hide posts or keywords, they're going to brigade them. They already brigade and harass explicitly GenAI communities and don't block them. They've harassed me multiple times, told me to die in DMs and even impersonated me for running such communities. Tagging isn't going to help, they're just going to use it to hunt down people who post it and brigade the posts or target the users, because they aren't angry that they are seeing it, they're angry that it exists and they wish to stamp it out, no matter the cost.

In short this is a good solution with good intentions but it assumes a level of good faith that just isn't there. I'd agree with this if the problem was really people just not wanting to see it, but the problem is much deeper. I'm sure that once people start doing it, the goal posts will be moved and they'll just stop using "untagged" as a reason for complaining.

[-] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 weeks ago

Their issue isn’t that they want to avoid it, they want to stamp it out, they want it gone

Exactly this. These sorts of people don't want to co-exist. They want to bully us out of existence.

and even impersonated me for running such communities.

Sorry you've had to go through that. I have been through that too (and still have it happen). So I know how frustrating it is. People on Lemmy can be super weird.

I'm all for OP's solution, but like you, I don't it will solve much because of just how much people like to stir up drama. They won't use those tags to block, they'll use those tags to find and harrass.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] pendant@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 weeks ago

imo you're giving in to a loud minority that aren't looking for reasonable solutions. They hate ai because of propaganda, and they want it gone. They'll keep pushing for more censorship every time because the genie won't go back in the bottle, but damned if they won't try anyways

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 weeks ago

This is not "giving in"

[-] Maxxie 10 points 2 weeks ago

If we operate on anecdotal rules, I am looking for reasonable solutions and would be happy with this one. If I can filter out stuff I actively dislike, I can live with other people enjoying it behind my back.

[-] rivvvver@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

if they want it gone, in what way does just tagging the content give in to this crowd?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago

It's a good idea in spirit but the tags will mostly be used to brigade and not to filter in my opinion. Most apps dont even have the feature if I'm not mistaken.

[-] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 weeks ago

If they brigade, we'll handle it

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 weeks ago

I already raised that concern as well, but I do think it's worth a try. Would be great to dupe the functionality of the NSFW tag for this purpose.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Eyedust@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 weeks ago

I was wondering if you guys would catch the latest shitstorm on this. Definitely a necessary precaution. Its a good idea, and I hope it will be enough.

Its getting to the point where people are blanket terming us as unhinged and blocking the whole instance because debates are getting heated. :(

[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 23 points 2 weeks ago

The anti-ai people are sending death threats and transphobic remarks to mods.

They really need to step back and reassess their lives.

[-] Eyedust@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 weeks ago

Its getting heated on both sides from what I've seen floating around. I have to stand more with db0, because the other side just seems to be openly marketing hate-mongering. Which of course is going to bait a rise out of some here. We haven't been going around slandering people who hate AI, but I've seen people going around openly slandering this instance for liking it. That's what happens when you create a community solely based on the hate of a subject. Its just a breeding ground for negative energy.

I've been on both sides. I'm not really cool with AI stealing art and prose to add onto their repertoire, but I have self-hosted LLMs and enjoy using them locally. There's a place for AI, and unfortunately big corp is pushing an agenda that places AI in a horrible light, so its no wonder people hate it. That doesn't mean that they should create a hate-based community, but hey, that's a part of real freedom.

On the other side of this coin, we have people here who stoke the flames by pre-banning people from communities they moderate in wild displays of power abuse, or joining in on fuck_ai to openly speak out in a community where they're obviously not wanted and in general just taking a stick to the beehive. I've seen plenty on this side that disregard the rules and beliefs of anarchy, instigate arguments, and flout the premise of one of the ideas that db0 stands against- abuse of power.

Like I said, I can't blame some of them. Its hard to ignore some of the obvious slander that db0 gets sometimes, but it doesn't mean we should openly validate them by getting hot around the collar about it. We shouldn't take the high road, either. Pretentious high-horsing is just as bad as openly getting angry. Let AI-haters openly bash AI and try to understand that there is a vindicated reason for it. Its not us or even AI itself, its how AI is being marketed and used by big corp. We need to push that we don't believe in that, the same as they don't, without swinging bats at the first hater we come across.

The best thing db0 can do right now is be respectful. I get it, we're not exactly receiving that same respect sometimes, but stooping down to low levels of disrespect just based on the venom that spits out of an individual's mouth is just not the answer. Whereas I don't think this will get as bad as .ml or hexbear levels of hatred, I really don't want us to be the next in that spotlight.

Death threats and transphobia are just the cries of the few disgusting extremists. I agree that they need to stop immediately. I tend to dislike anything extremist. Their respective instances should be taking action against those individuals. If they don't, I have no doubts that Lemmy will stand against them as a whole. Transphobia in general isn't and shouldn't be tolerated anywhere, and usually isn't tolerated here at all.

In the case of those individuals, I just see children throwing a tantrum and trying anything to scare or upset mods. That's when slurs and scare tactics pop their ugly heads out of the grass, and they should be ashamed for just thinking those things, let alone acting on them. But that's not instance vs. instance. That's a handful of people in an instance being angry at a handful of people from another instance. There should be no reason to start a war of many based on the battle of a few.

So I don't disagree with you, but the context makes all the difference in the world. Its a very complicated and complex situation.

tl;dr: This whole thing sucks, but at least we're taking steps on our side to solve it.

[-] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 weeks ago

I got called an alt of db0 because I explained the instance's stance on Ai.

[-] Eyedust@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 weeks ago

It's going to take a while to do that now. People are all riled up right now and really should cool off a bit. I know what you mean, though, because this instance's stance on AI is basically my stance on it.

There are great applications for it, but the government and big corp are pushing it into a disgusting direction, as they do with everything they get their hands on that could give them power or money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Taser@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 weeks ago

FWIW, I approve/agree with this rule.

[-] tal@lemmy.today 15 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Most AI image generators that generate images add EXIF metadata indicating that the image is AI-generated. This helps people who want to identify AI-generated images readily.

In the case of ComfyUI, it even includes the entire workflow


like, another ComfyUI user can just grab the image, drop it onto their ComfyUI Web UI and they'll be right where the generating user was.

Unfortunately, EXIF metadata can contain location information


some cameras and such add it


and this metadata led to people posting images at places like Reddit being doxxed after they didn't realize that they were posting their GPS location and maybe real name, stuff that some cameras attach. As a result, a number of image-hosting places simply strip all metadata, to prevent users from from accidentally leaking this information.

Pict-rs, the software package that Lemmy hosts run to permit image uploads, does this. Unfortunately, it means that those "this is an AI-generated image" tags get stripped off.

So, for example, on my system, with ComfyUI, using ImageMagick:

$ identify -verbose output/ComfyUI_00312_.png 

"Properties:prompt" has a JSON encoding of the workflow.

Sample images generated by various AI image generators are readily-available on civitai.com.

For this generator that generated this image on civitai, it looks like the parameter is "Properties:parameters".

I believe that there are a small number of such tags today.

It would be technically possible to just not have pict-rs strip that particular tag (or tags, if there are multiple that a given generator adds?) off, have a list of "AI-generated tags", then have Lemmy add some visual indicator that an image is AI-generated. I'd suggest that this is probably a better longer-term route to indicate that an image is AI-generated than manually-tagging post titles, for a couple of reasons:

  • Spiders that index images on the Web will know that the image is AI-generated and can flag that for users and let them use that as a filtering criteria (e.g. Kagi Images permits for this). They aren't going to understand tags in post titles, but the metadata tags are somewhat universal.

  • Doesn't require manual effort if an image can have some indicator or flair or whatever put on it automatically. And I guarantee that some users are going to get this wrong just by accident, because different instances have different rules. Easier to change how a computer works than to change human behavior across-the-board.

  • Works on all instances.

  • The information remains attached to the image even if downloaded.

  • Works for images that aren't just the subject of single-image posts and don't have an associated title.

  • Speaking purely for myself, I kind of like the open-source, collaborative aspect of sharing the workflows or prompts, since it helps other users see how an image was created and learn from it; it's something that I'm glad to see the generators include, and I'm kind of sad that we strip it off on the Threadiverse.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 weeks ago

Kudos.

That's it, that's the comment

[-] 000@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 weeks ago

This is a hopefully a happy middle group that stops these stupid fights and makes people focus on bigger things.

[-] Soapbox@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 weeks ago

As a genAI hater, I appreciate this. I already block the dedicated communities as I see them in /all. This is helpful to filter out more of the outliers if posters cooperate and actually use the tag. (I think alot of genAI zealots get off on trying to see if people will notice their posts are AI.)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Widdershins@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

What about that mod banning people from ai communities before they could block the community?

[-] hendu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 weeks ago

If they don't want to see the AI communities anyway, is that really a problem?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] UniversalMonk@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 weeks ago

Then people who hate ai should be grateful, because they don't want anything to do with that community anyway. :)

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2025
565 points (100.0% liked)

/0

2005 readers
1 users here now

Meta community. Discuss about this lemmy instance or lemmy in general.

Service Uptime view

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS