463
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by sga013@lemmy.world to c/upliftingnews@lemmy.world

It has been 15 days since the post about future of politics in this community was made, and results are somewhat clear - 35 (39 - 4) in favor of no poltics vs 4 (7 - 3) in favor of poltical natured posts.

If I use politcal lingo, this would be a landslide victory of no politics faction.

"What does this mean"?

Who is "We"?

I am speakinng currently for collective group of moderators, and also the community itself (as in, we do not do that here).

We are banning schadenfreude - which roughly translates to feeling joy at someone else's misfortune. What that means is, if there is someone who you (or a lot of people) do not like gets some disease which they could not have planned for (for example cancer), then this is not a uplifting news. If they are making losses, that is not uplifting. If they are depressed, that is not uplifting. We will not be retroactively actively removing posts, but future posts of this nature will be deleted as per understanding of moderators or community (by means of votes or reports).

We are also banning politics. That by itself is a statement political in nature. Everything is political but what we are banning is the more clearer mainstream politics. We do not really want to know if this group we do not like lost/won somewhere. But what is acceptable is, for example, some good person (good because other things they have done in life) is awarded something. This can be political in nature (example, a nobel prize), and there is no clear way to put in words what is and is not allowed. If yoou have a better method to express this, then please add in comments.

More clarification - we are not banning news which maybe political in nature, but which is toxic politics. if there is a news which is political, lets say some marginalised group got better rights, that is allowed, or even welcomed. Think simple - if you can tell some small kid the news, and they feel good, then it is uplifting. It should not require you to know what the person has done in past. If something bad happens to a bad person, then that is still bad, it does not become uplifting for a kid. this example by itself also has flaws, and I am still unable to word it well. But I hope the spirit of rule is clearer. no toxicity.

We are also banning low effort news or fake news. This could be news which is not adding anything new at all or is a copy of a copy of a copy (and bad one). Please try to fetch original sources. This is just to maintain a standard. This does not restrict you from posting a news which is targeted at a small group, or is published by a small group which may not be publishing a very fancy, furnished looking posts. Essentially - a no fluff rule.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] cupcakezealot 4 points 6 days ago

More clarification - we are not banning news which maybe political in nature, but which is toxic politics.

thank god :)

[-] PrivateNoob@sopuli.xyz 101 points 1 week ago

Glad to see some great improvements. I always felt weird whenever schadenfreude posts were posted in this community and banning political posts are just the cream on top. Keep on going!

[-] misterdoctor@lemmy.world 43 points 1 week ago

Totally agree. Seeing someone diagnosed with cancer shared as uplifting news just felt off and not in the spirit of what this community should be about.

[-] CarbonatedPastaSauce@lemmy.world 51 points 1 week ago

I missed the voting but I’m happy at the result. These are good rules for this community.

[-] Chozo@fedia.io 19 points 1 week ago

I also missed it. Which is disappointing because I had brought up this subject a few times and at least wanted to take part in the discussions (luckily it went as I had hoped it would). Unfortunately, keeping a post on a Lemmy feed visible long enough for everybody to see it is kinda hard to do right now. Especially for those of us who primarily browse from our main feed pages, and not directly on the community where stickied threads can be seen.

[-] khannie@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago

Delighted to hear this. I subbed for actually uplifting news and the schadenfreude political posts were becoming tiresome.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Chozo@fedia.io 26 points 1 week ago

Thank you. Communities like this are one of the few places left where I can just read something that makes me feel good without it coming at the expense of someone else's misfortune (even IF they're shitty people). Sometimes I need that little bit of escape during my day; more and more often lately, in fact. So I'm glad to see this enforced.

[-] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 week ago

It's hard to believe people find schandenfraude to be uplifting.

I don't often agree with mods banning shit. But this I can get by.

[-] tko@tkohhh.social 8 points 1 week ago

It's 100% about being on topic. It's especially important when most people see the content in the context of a mixed feed where they might upvote a news story that they like without noticing which community it was posted in.

[-] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 week ago

Sadly yes. It is about maintaining the community standard this way. When I think of uplifting news, I'm thinking more on something like the progress in science than the Republicans getting what they finally deserve.

[-] sga013@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

thank you. If you check in past (maybe go 2 weeks or more back) you will see what regular hunk was posted

[-] ptmb@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Question about this decision, would for example a news article about a commonly marginalised group getting rights considered political?

An example would be for example last year's news about Thailand becoming the first southeast Asian country to legalise gay marriage. Or the news from 2023 about how transgender people in the US were since then allowed at that time to select a non-binary mark on their passports.

Some people could consider those political posts to not be included under the new rules, but they are very much good news and I would like to know.

[-] sga013@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

they are accepted. as i said, everything is political, and we can not ban everything. if a marginalised group gets better rights, that is absolutely a uplifting news. we want to ban stupid news, like so and so leader lost/imposed so anad so orders.

[-] ptmb@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 week ago

That is excellent news! Thank you for the clarification 😄

[-] Reyali@lemm.ee 11 points 1 week ago

Would you even call it…. uplifting?

^(I’ll see myself out.)^

[-] neons@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 week ago

Screenshot and post

[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I agree with banning misinformation and low effort.

But you can't ban politics. Everything is politics

[-] MBM@lemmings.world 8 points 1 week ago

Everything is political but what we are banning is the more clearer mainstream politics. We do not really want to know if this group we do not like lost/won somewhere.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago

Excuse me, they said no politics and this is clearly a political comment you just made.

[-] Owlboi@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago

but i love Schadenfreude. its one of the few joys left in this world

[-] Quibblekrust@thelemmy.club 22 points 1 week ago

Then make a community for it.

[-] sga013@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

(please be sattire, please be sattire)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Envy@fedia.io 12 points 1 week ago

Political*

Spell check helps make mod announcements look more professional!

Edit since I've been downvoted into oblivion and can be snarky, I'm just proud yall spelled schadenfreude right

[-] sga013@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

schadenfreude was pasted all the times, i am a terrible typist. and you do not deserve downvotes

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

While we're at it, then, "targeted" only has two T's, not three.

^(Ducks.)^

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] huppakee@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

Proffesionel anoncamints vrry inporrent yes!

[-] Envy@fedia.io 7 points 1 week ago

If these users could spell, they'd be really mad at you!

[-] huppakee@lemm.ee 12 points 1 week ago
[-] sga013@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

I will allow it

[-] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Isn't this TECHNICALLY a schadenfreude post? If you were on the side of not having such posts you'd be reading this with a sense of schadenfreude towards those who DID want the posts.

[-] Dayroom7485@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

lol so meta 🤣

[-] sga013@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

rule was enacted after this was published and i said i am not going to enact retroactively. i am from the side not wanting these posts, but maybe not as strongly worded

[-] Brunbrun6766@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Just joking my guy, I don't have a horse in this race

[-] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Great rules

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 10 points 1 week ago
[-] TheImpressiveX@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago

Now this is Uplifting News.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

couldn't this post be considered schadenfreude for the users who didn't enjoy the schadenfreude posts?

[-] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 8 points 1 week ago

This post doesn't seem like uplifting news.

[-] sga013@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

sorry, sometimes we have to be the bearer of the bad news too

[-] frank@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 week ago

Man, this was really weird to read at first.

"Schadenfreude is banned" by itself is a strange statement, but posts that are just schadenfreude is a great ban for this community. Thanks mods!

[-] drasglaf@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

Now, this is the kind of uplifting news I like to read here :)

[-] spittingimage@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

I like the sound of this.

[-] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 5 points 1 week ago

The banning will continue until morale improves!

[-] drmoose@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Agree with everything but "banning politics" - so some new green policy cannot be posted here? Those are the best uplifting news!

[-] sga013@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

they can be posted. as i said - everything is politics, and we can not ban politics. for more details (there were similar queries before) please read other comments. (or just search politics)

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2025
463 points (100.0% liked)

Uplifting News

15514 readers
61 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity and rage (e.g. schadenfreude) often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS