46
That’s a bold word to use, considering Scotland got started on colonialism before England did, and the Scotch were the most vigorously committed members of the colonial service and military.
Didnae say we weren't. Wouldn't use that word to describe us today. Unlike Starmer
Why do Scot’s say didnae but not wouldnae?
As ye wudnae sae didnae tae yer ma, did ye?
Yo no hablo Scots, señor.
Scotch is a bold word to use when trying to take the moral high ground, you xenophobe.
Can you provide a source for your claim of being the most vigorously committed members or are you just talking out your arse?
The first English overseas expansion occurred as early as 1169, when the Norman invasion of Ireland began to establish English possessions in Ireland, with thousands of English and Welsh settlers arriving in Ireland.[3] As a result of this the Lordship of Ireland was claimed for centuries by the English monarch
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/English_overseas_possessions
Scotland's colonialism began in the 1600s, quite a bit later than the 1100s...
Chaps like Henry Dundas (literally put upon a pedestal, and former head of the EIC) made a vast amount of wealth that was used to build Scottish cities, found its banks and institutions. Scotland was obsessed with education, and what the educated did was they got work administering colonial affairs. And of course, the very enthusiastic colonisation of Ireland.
So literally nothing that the English and Welsh didn't also do. We were all bastards.
Olap's mention of Starmer being a colonialist is because he is outright denying the chance of a democratic process, regardless of what the Scottish electorate desire, like a colonialist would do. Not to mention his support for Israel, a true modern colonial power.
Maybe think next time before you go running to defend an antidemocratic genocide supporter and keep your bigotry to yourself.
I presume therefore as such a passionate advocate for democracy that, if Scotland became independent, you would support a decennial referendum on joining the UK? Or is only the “right” result worthy of being deemed a democratic process?
Scotch is a drink.
Well, if anyone would know, it’s you.
Why not just call my mum names while you're at it.
Was she also named after a chain of off-licences?
Was that before the union?
No PM is really going to want to agree to one. It's going to take a lot of pressuring and strong SNP showings in both parliaments to get to a stage where a PM considers it.
Yes, understandable, but he could have not answered too
The most annoying thing politicians do is not answering the question.
refusal to grant a referendum while also striking down any devolved laws they don't like? that's not a union that's colonisation.
Why would there be one anytime soon?
I dunno, maybe people in Scotland keep electing pro indy majorities or some other antidemocratic guff. Holyrood is going to the polls next year
Yet the people of Scotland said no in the referendum not so long ago. If it was anything like the Brexit referendum I'm surprised anyone would want to go through that again.
I'm not even British, and I'm painfully aware that the difficulty of (re)obtaining EU membership was one of the "no" arguments during the independence referendum. The fact that the rest of the country turned around and voted to leave the EU against Scottish wishes just 2 years later should at least be grounds for a second referendum, if that's what the Scottish people want.
The fact that the rest of the country turned around and voted to leave the EU
Just to be clear, 51% of the United Kingdom voted to leave the EU in what was sold as a 'non-binding referendum'. Fucking morons. The fucking corrupt tory pricks in charge decided that 51% of voters was enough to call it a majority, and removed us from the best trade agreement we will ever have had with the European Economic Union.
It was one of the arguments, but I don't think it was anything binding to trigger a second referendum.
The Scottish people wanting a referendum or not. Is the only matter of any importance to the issue.
On a somewhat false premise, to put it mildly, considering it was held prior to the brexit referendum (which suddenly became binding).
Brexit invalidated the results because many voted for the sole purpose of staying in the EU, public support is now at a majority, and Reform getting in would raise support significantly.
non-brit here. i watched a season of Bakeoff where one of the contestants mentioned being a unionist while making a patriotic cake or something like that. from the outside it is utterly fucking weird to have someone's political stance be "Everything Is Fine Like This, You Are Actually Happy Where You Are, Do Not Consider Leaving"
What is it that you find strange exactly?
"Once in a lifetime. " SNP - This matter should have been settled for 50-100 years.
But Russias money is so good and its so easy to blame someone else.
Write the whole quote not just the bit you like.
Sorry , I was wrong with 'once in a lifetime' the exact language used was 'once in a generation'
“The debate we are engaged in as a nation is about the future of all of us lucky enough to live in this diverse and vibrant country. It is a rare and precious moment in the history of Scotland - a once in a generation opportunity to chart a better way.” Alex Salmond.
“It is the view of the current Scottish Government that a referendum is a once-in-a-generation opportunity." Scottish Government White Paper.
Did they have their fingers crossed behind their back when they said these things?
Having a once-on-a-lifetime holiday doesn't preclude you from having another holiday on the chance it's another once-in-a-lifetime holiday.
And "opportunity" adds a whole bunch of context. Support was high for independence, a government was in power that was (and still is) popular and progressive, and the UK government agreed to respect the result. That, to me, is what "opportunity" means: the time is right.
If there is another surge of support, another Scottish government is elected on the premise of independence and delivers such a crushing victory as the SNP did, then it's just down to the UK government denying the Scottish Government.
Da Comrade.
We will break the English hold on the Glorious Scottish people.
But if your actually a real person living in the UK then I'm much rather we all work together to keep the country united , stop the tories selling everything and most importantly: (For everyone in europe/world) dont let Reform (Russia) get anywhere near power.
Yeh, I'm a real person. And I live in Scotland. And I'm not Russian.
So fuck off with that pish.
I would also rather keep the Tories and reform out of power.
But I also suffered many years of not voting Tory - and having a Scottish government that isn't Tory - and still had to put up with a Tory government.
I voted against independence because I didn't want to leave the EU - something I felt the UK government had a guarantee on, but was very undefined with independence.
And now that we have labour in the UK government, they are just Tory-lite.
I get that they moved right in order to scoop up more votes, but they aren't going to return left.
They are passing austerity laws. They are not standing up for trans and immigrant rights.
I'm certain they are better than the Tories, and maybe they're just having a rocky start.
Maybe I'm paying too much (or maybe not enough?) attention to the news, so I'm only catching the negatives.
Reform aren't gonna get power in Scotland, Tories aren't gonna get power in Scotland.
But it feels like Scotland is trying to do better and keeps on getting dragged down by the UK.
this post was submitted on 03 Jun 2025
46 points (100.0% liked)
UK Politics
4113 readers
128 users here now
General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS