215
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by crmsnbleyd@sopuli.xyz to c/linkedinlunatics@sh.itjust.works
all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] blargle@sh.itjust.works 3 points 4 days ago

Ok, being a fly, try breaking into a beehive and laying your eggs in their honey, see how well it goes for you. Or just be thankful that you answer to no queen and all the world's shit is yours for the taking.

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 117 points 1 week ago

"Read that again"

A sentence that never follows something of value

[-] Venus_Ziegenfalle@feddit.org 47 points 1 week ago

I love that the "read that again" is part of the quote of an unknown source quoting a nameless "wise man".

[-] noodlejetski@piefed.social 18 points 1 week ago

A SENTENCE THAT NEVER FOLLOWS SOMETHING OF VALUE

[-] noodlejetski@piefed.social 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[-] drislands@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

A SENTENCE!

[-] ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 week ago

I think the quoted person called "unknown" is a good indicator as well.

[-] isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de 81 points 1 week ago

instructions unclear, i've been reading this in a loop for the past 7 hours

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 30 points 1 week ago

That's how you end up with massive AWS bills.

[-] Sergio@slrpnk.net 20 points 1 week ago

Oh, but did you try reading it again louder?

[-] rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago

"For the people in the back"? The back of where? What is this man talking about? I'm not on stage. I'm in my living room, waiting for the kettle to boil. Are there people in my house? Who are "the people in the back"? I'm reading this sentence out loud but it still sounds fucking stupid. Help me, bald man with beard!

[-] drolex@sopuli.xyz 20 points 1 week ago

LinkedIn is finally allowed by Scarfolk council

[-] AtariDump@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago
[-] drolex@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

Thanks, reread in hi-res!

[-] HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

I mean from the flies' perspective the opposite is probably true, so wygd

[-] Drbreen@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 week ago

Smart people don't bother explaining to dumb people how dumb they are.

[-] Psaldorn@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago

And yet the post and the message both try to get you to explain it by reading it again or louder.

[-] Fabian@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 week ago

I think grown bees don't eat honey

[-] naeap@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

In my experience they do.
I've given some cooled out bees some honey and warm water, and they always go for it and usually recover and fly away

[-] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You know... I actually agree with this one. This is why I don't go around telling people Linux is better.

[-] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Thanks for a sane comment to build on.

I actually think it is a fault of the American educated class that they assume that the uneducated people understand what they missed.

We all think everyone gets it or will get it with some Cliffs Notes.

That just isn’t true.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago

Honey is bee vomit so...there's that.

[-] gofsckyourself@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

It's not technically vomit because they have a special chamber separate from their stomach for it.

https://busybeekeeping.com/is-honey-bee-poop-or-bee-vomit-heres-the-truth/

[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

If honey is bee vomit, then babies are human piss

[-] CtrlAltDefeat@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)
[-] teft@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago
[-] CtrlAltDefeat@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Tomato tomatoe

[-] Evil_Shrubbery@lemm.ee 7 points 1 week ago

"Hey, boss, why do we have to lick shit? Isn't there a lot of honey?" - "That is just s myth, now eat your shit."

[-] A_Chilean_Cyborg@feddit.cl 4 points 1 week ago

this is recursive, people will never stop reading this forever until they die of starvation.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago
[-] Damage@feddit.it 3 points 1 week ago
[-] crmsnbleyd@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago

Thank you 🫡

now the question is whether the edit will federate

[-] Damage@feddit.it 1 points 1 week ago

Are there known issues with that?

[-] crmsnbleyd@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 week ago

I've seen it first hand

this post was submitted on 28 May 2025
215 points (100.0% liked)

LinkedinLunatics

4657 readers
159 users here now

A place to post ridiculous posts from linkedIn.com

(Full transparency.. a mod for this sub happens to work there.. but that doesn't influence his moderation or laughter at a lot of posts.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS