132
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@lemmy.ml 43 points 1 year ago

"Mr Murphy write in the Mail on Sunday that a law should be introduced to make abuse or violence towards retail workers an offence in its own right across the UK"

Is brandishing a knife at someone not already an offense?

Surely the problem is a shameful lack of policing and more people falling into poverty following 15 years of tory rule. how is creating an offense out of something that is already an offense going to change anything?

[-] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Seriously. Emulating the USA’s criminal “policies” is stupid, and I live here. Next thing he’s going to suggest all your cops have guns, and then suddenly you’ll have black market firearms everywhere.

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

Every police officer in Northern Ireland has firearms and there's no issue

[-] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Or Tesco can cough up the dough for security guards like they used to, before Tesco made them “redundant” and replaced them with apparently ineffective technology as others have mentioned.

[-] wewbull@feddit.uk 5 points 1 year ago

If, as a giant corporate entity, your employees are getting wide spread abuse, you need to look at your company and assess why so much anger exists. The problem is likely rooted in Tesco treating it's customers like shit whilst they are living through an economic crisis.

Yes, somebody who snaps and draws a weapon is ultimately in the wrong, but with the numbers of customers Tesco has there was always a good chance somebody would snap.

[-] Mex@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

No need for new laws here, the current laws should just be actaully enforced.

[-] Oneeightnine@feddit.uk 35 points 1 year ago

Used to work in a pretty sizable Sainsbury's up until last year. I never dealt with physical abuse from a customer, but I did hear about a fair bit of it, especially from the female members of staff.

Customers would come in and start being incredibly inappropriate to them. You'd hear that one customer had patted them on the bottom, or grabbed their hand. One customer would routinely come in and start trying to kiss my partner's hand (we worked together). You report this behaviour to management and at best it's laughed off.

Don't even get me started on the behaviour some customers think they're entitled to push on staff who are unfortunate enough to have to do reductions in the evening; grabbing, pushing, shouting, you name it, it's done. Management are adamant it has to be done on the shop floor though, why? You tell me.

Ultimately what I'm trying to say is that a lot of these sort of things might be less prominent if management came out and backed their colleagues when a customer was showing signs of being a t*at. Fitting them with cameras makes it look like another profit protection measure.

[-] LastSprinkles@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Fitting them with cameras makes it look like another profit protection measure.

I was nodding along till here. Wouldn't fitting employees with body cameras making it easier to prosecute the criminals? Lack of evidence is probably the issue in most cases.

[-] Oneeightnine@feddit.uk 13 points 1 year ago

Because in my experience (15 years of supermarket work) I've never seen anything get treated as importantly as they treat profit protection.

[-] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

Sorry, I'm being dense this Sunday. How does this protect profit? Surely fitting employees with body cams eats into your profit as it is a cost?

[-] Oneeightnine@feddit.uk 3 points 1 year ago

Customers are significantly less likely to try and pocket something if there's a risk of them being called up on it, or actually caught on camera.

Even if they never actually catch anyone, the fact that people can see the cameras would likely serve as a deterrent.

[-] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

Is that not a good thing? Less chance of criminal activity, less chance of getting stabbed whilst stacking shelves?

[-] Oneeightnine@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

Absolutely. I just find it a bit....much when they try to label this as a means to protect staff when everything they do signals that isn't their main motive.

[-] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

Gotcha. I understand your point of view, I just think maybe they can do both? Protect their liability against being sued for safety on the workplace and at the same time reduce the risk of their employees getting hurt.

[-] Oneeightnine@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah that's all we ask. I understand why they want to ensure products aren't being stolen, but I also feel like they could be doing significantly more to ensure colleagues aren't being intimidated and assaulted.

Of course, the best way for staff to feel safer is if customers stopped being absolutely dickheads, but we seem to be going on the wrong way on that front.

[-] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

Oh man, I can imagine. I don't understand what goes through some people's heads.

[-] Emperor@feddit.uk 19 points 1 year ago

I went to Asda not long after lockdown had lifted the first time and said something standard to the lady on the checkout like "long day?" and she looked at me with hollow eyes and told me that when she'd told a woman they'd run out of toilet roll the customer spat in her face. Some people are the worst.

[-] Transcendant@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sometimes you can tell the checkout asst is just fucking done having the same basic conversation 100x and wants to scan silently, but I always try and inject a bit of happiness into their day if they've not fallen mute. Working any public-facing retail job is bloody awful... speaking from personal experience, I used to temp at Toys R Us at christmas and let me tell you, there's no more entitled creature than a parent at christmas who has left it too late to get this years most popular toy.

BUT *MYYYYY * CHIIIIIILD

[-] RobotToaster@infosec.pub 14 points 1 year ago

If someone is already assaulting a member of staff, what stops them just stealing the camera?

Call me cynical, but it sounds like a disguise for a profit protection thing.

[-] SmellyHamWallet@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

After 1900 our Tesco local has their doors locked and you have to be let in. Why are people such pricks. I work on the railway and someone threatened to stab me over a £4 ticket the other day. I just fucking hate people.

[-] theo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Must be a pretty old Tesco to be still going after 123 years!

[-] wewbull@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

Crime goes up when desperation levels go up. People are desperate. Agreed, it's wrong that it puts you in danger, but you are the face of the corporation they are angry at. It's misdirected anger.

I hope you give your employers an earful for putting you in that vulnerable position.

[-] FatLegTed@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

They'd be told to look for work elsewhere.

But in a less polite manner.

[-] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

Well if your employer is putting you in danger, that might be a good outcome. You probably have a good employment law case.

[-] fruity@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

The video in that article is wild, what the actual fuck

[-] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 1 points 1 year ago

Welp 😥.

Fucking hell I'd be petrified. That mad lad can just have the chocolate hobnobs, they aren't worth it...

[-] kandoh@reddthat.com 3 points 1 year ago

Honestly, how long until all of us are wearing body cameras so we have accurate evidence of what is happening?

[-] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago

Ik someone who works in Sainsbury's and she wears a bodycamera

this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2023
132 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4087 readers
150 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS