67
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I believe this perspective is important before people start commenting from the headline

"For example, the study finds the wealthiest 10% of people – defined as those who earn at least €42,980 (£36,605) per year – contributed seven times more to the rise in monthly heat extremes around the world than the global average."

Point being, this isn't talking about extreme wealth

[-] dumblederp@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I'd be interested to see what percentage of damage was being done by the top 1% of wealth.

[-] CrustyCrinkles@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

Thanks for pointing that out, it really does change the narrative!

this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
67 points (100.0% liked)

worldnews

2244 readers
44 users here now

Welcome! This community is constantly upgrading and is a current work in progress. Please stay tuned.

/c/Worldnews@sh.itjust.works strives for high-quality standards on the latest world events.

The basis of these standards comes from the MBFC, which uses an aggregate of methodologies, including the IFCN and World Freedom Indices, to rate the Bias and Factual Reporting of News.

These are non-profit organisations with full transparency of their funding and structure. Likewise, this community is also transparent – Please feel free to question its staff and the overall content of this community.


Does your post fit the standards? Check this thread!



Rules:


Disallowed submissions

Commenters will receive one public warning with only one strike if violating any of the following rules:

Thank you.

todo list:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS