1090

I don't get why a such law took so long, but late is better than never.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] zarkanian@sh.itjust.works 5 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Um, that's great and everything, but it's still too young. Your brain doesn't finish developing until you're 25, and the brain is the part of the body you're concerned about when you're making laws about when somebody should be able to make a big decision like getting married.

[-] twice_hatch@midwest.social 3 points 21 hours ago

Not to mention that marriage is a phase, they shouldn't really be letting people get married. Do you even know what those wedding cakes are made of? And what if someone bullies you?

[-] thespcicifcocean@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

I got married at 21, to a woman who was 30. Worst mistake of my life.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Md27@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

Anecdotally I am tending to agree but I have no scientific background. I feel like laws like this can be studied and then back by verification

[-] frozenpopsicle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 21 hours ago

Baby steps, It's Missouri.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 24 points 1 day ago
[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

Watch the Republicans set their hair on fire in response while introducing legislation to allow more child workers as well.

The party of family values.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] andros_rex@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago
[-] 96VXb9ktTjFnRi@feddit.nl 28 points 1 day ago

Old enough to marry but too young to divorce. That's the stupidest thing I've heard this week.

[-] andros_rex@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

That’s the point - the power imbalance. Marry off young girls to men who can groom and control them. Daddy-husbands and child-wives. The Christian complementarian model sees women as essentially children anyway. Like Moon’s comment implies - if they marry you off at 12, you are never getting the independence to escape.

At least Tennessee Representative John Rose waited until the teenager he met judging a FFA competition was 18.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 10 points 1 day ago

Two questions:

  1. What was the age before?

  2. What's the lowest age permitted in all the States?

[-] stoly@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago

In many it used to be something like with parental permission. Basically child trafficking enshrined in law.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] spittingimage@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I mean... this is reason to celebrate, but at the same time it's like saying you're giving up on blinding orphan puppies. You were doing what?

[-] gaja@lemm.ee 79 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Rep. Hardy Billington, R-Poplar Bluff, was among the few who spoke against the bill, arguing that barring pregnant teenagers from getting married would increase abortion rates.

“We all claim to be pro-life here in the body,” Billington said. “Now we’re going to vote on this bill where babies are going to die.”

Disgusting. What a pitiful excuse to enable the trafficking of children. I'm ashamed to live here. There's no fucking guarantee that it would even increase abortion rate, this guy is a closeted pedophile looking out for his ilk.

Apparently he's been spouting this bullshit for at least the past year. Not to mention he's also a homophobe.

[-] Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world 40 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Sounds like an old guy from the 50s, who still clings to 50s social mores and stigmas, unaware that being a single mother isn't the massive taboo he remembers it being.

Checks Hardy Billington's Wikipedia page

Born 1952 or 1953 (age 71–72)

Aaaaaand there we have it. Not sure why his exact birthdate isn't known. In fact the only notable thing on that page is about him expressing opposition to another child marriage bill that was proposed last year. Imagine having "strongly endorses child marriage" as the one and only legacy from your 70+ years of life. Gross.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] yesman@lemmy.world 27 points 1 day ago

The next time someone makes fun of shithole countries remind them that hundreds of 12yo are married in the US every year. And I guess their little bodies are ready for motherhood because many of them produce a baby in 4 or 6 mo after the wedding.

[-] Zink@programming.dev 13 points 1 day ago

many of them produce a baby in 4 or 6 mo after the wedding

Wow, they are just precocious in every way, aren’t they?

[-] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago

The usual shit that islamophobes would say is that 'at least they aren't 9' even if many Islamic countries ban that shit and large age gaps in marriage (Egypt is one example) and many children marriages that do happen are between children. As in, an 11 year old girl is betrothed to a 14 year old boy (still not cool though). They also ignore that in many cases a man who does marry a little kid is often socially ostracized and treated like shit for doing that.

[-] yesman@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Western Chauvinism and Islamophobia have red-pilled so many promising minds into the intellectual sewer of bigotry.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] 96VXb9ktTjFnRi@feddit.nl 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Studying the Child marriage in the United States Wikipedia page. Looking at the map legenda that says 'red = 0', thinking 'surely that means it's forbidden, right? right??' What the fuck.

[-] Maeve@kbin.earth 8 points 1 day ago

In California, for instance, the general marriage age is 18, but children may be married with parental consent and judicial approval with no minimum age limit.[53

[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

The fact that so many states allow marriage at 16 is concerning. 🫤

[-] muusemuuse@lemm.ee 18 points 1 day ago

You mean they hadn't already?!

[-] scoobford@lemmy.zip 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's legal in a lot of the US, yes. Sometimes it requires approval from a judge, 4 states have no minimum age at all.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_marriage_in_the_United_States

[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

The fact that California is one of those 4 is fucking mind blowing. They banned smoking and legalized weed but can't be bothered to stop child brides from happening????

[-] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 day ago

I thought US was a 1st world country...

[-] twice_hatch@midwest.social 4 points 20 hours ago

The first world / second world / third world classification was some system made up by the US during the Cold war to put the US at the top of their own tier list. It's always been silly

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

The actual 1st world thinks differently. 😒

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago
[-] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 43 points 1 day ago

"in a move that infuriates conservatives..."

[-] NobodyElse@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 day ago

The final version of the bill passed the House by a vote of 129-14, with one member voting present. In the Senate, it passed by a vote of 32-1. Sen. Mike Moon, R-Ash Grove, was the only vote against.

What sort of garbage person do you have to be to vote against something like this?

[-] prole 31 points 1 day ago

A Republican

Check the hard drives of those 14

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 84 points 1 day ago

And if it fails, you know whoever voted for it to not pass is a child predator. Hopefully there's a list of people who voted "no" on it that gets leaked so people, especially parents, know who to cut contact with.

[-] entwine413@lemm.ee 61 points 1 day ago

I mean, basically every Republican legislature or executive is a child predator. It's like a prerequisite to join the party. Their ratings don't drop when they're exposed.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] donuts@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago

Hopefully there's a list of people who voted "no" on it that gets leaked

There is no need for leaks, it's right in the article:

The final version of the bill passed the House by a vote of 129-14, with one member voting present. In the Senate, it passed by a vote of 32-1. Sen. Mike Moon, R-Ash Grove, was the only vote against.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Snowclone@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

Finally. The bare fucking minimum.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
1090 points (100.0% liked)

Uplifting News

14929 readers
1687 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS