170
all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Zak@lemmy.world 86 points 1 week ago

However, this U.S. court order is inconsistent with the Apple App Store business standards

This is terrible writing. The court order is inconsistent with the Apple App Store business standards? No. The court ruled that Apple's business practices were illegal.

[-] protogen420 22 points 1 week ago

USA's press has a corporate bias, because you know, we need to care about the corporations, as if they had feelings, and not the exploitive entities that they are.

[-] Zak@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

This doesn't seem to be the mainstream press, but a small tech blog. Mainstream American news outlets have been far more straightforward in their coverage of this case.

Furthermore, this case was a fight between two large corporations; there's no little guy here. Smaller developers may benefit from the outcome though.

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago

Die apple. All your innovation and vision died with Steve Jobs, now you're a shambling corpse infecting everything you touch. Just die, it's time...

[-] oppy1984@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

Yep crApple is the one pushing for the shorter SSL certificate length too. Their just adding headaches to everyone's lives for no good reason.

[-] NotProLemmy@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

Shorter SSL certificate length means more security

Even Mozilla's pushing it

[-] Strawberry 1 points 1 week ago

Do you have a link to an explanation of this? I am curious to learn more

[-] oppy1984@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

I'm going on what I heard from Security Now but it is my understanding that apple was the only one pushing for this and the others just voted to approve even though apple was never able to present a convincing argument for why it needed to be shortened.

[-] Netrunner@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah and having a 512 character password is more secure than 52.

This isn't some big exploit vector they're fixing, they're trying to make it more annoying to automate a IoT stack without the cloud.

[-] trollblox_@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Steve Jobs was an old quack business man. he didn't invent shit.

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Sure, he wasn't an engineer, so no, Jobs never personally "invented" anything. But Jobs at least knew what was good and what was shit when he saw it. Under Tim Cook, Apple just keeps putting out shitty unimaginative products, Cook is allowing Apple to stagnate, a dangerous thing to do when they have under 10% market share.

[-] skozzii@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 week ago

I will never support Apple because of their anti-consuner practices.

[-] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Gotta protect that illegal, anticompetitive trust at all costs.

[-] Guidy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

I’m never giving epic games a dime, I can assure you if that.

This is one of those things many people seem to think will be a win but will actually suck once every app is able to charge you directly.

[-] DomeGuy@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

There is no pattern of facts where "Apple gets to collect a tax on any transaction you make on your iPhone" is a good thing

[-] protogen420 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

what is wrong with app being able to charge you directly? Yes Epic is a greedy corporate entity like any other, but apple's arbritary resctrions are comical and shouldn't ever have existed, they outragous and outright ridiculous, there is a clear conflict of interest of an App store which in theory should try to attract apps with smaller cuts, but in case of Apple since they control both the OS and store they simply force a monopoly, so that they don't need to improve their store, all corporate entities eventually tend towards monopolistic anti competitive behavior that restrict market freedom in a attempt to not need to compete, usually through exploitting their position in one field, like OS, to force a their subpar product of a different field onto consumers, like a shit app store, Apple does not want competition, they fear it, that's why they use so many scummy anti competitive tactics, the entire idea of restricting an OS to only one source of apps is insane and monopolistic by nature.

[-] Zak@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

I'm disappointed the court didn't strike down the app store monopoly itself. The iPhone might actually appeal to me with unlimited sideloading.

[-] protogen420 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I wouldn't settle for anything less than being able to jailbreak it, repair it, and sideload whatever I want as I please. Too bad critical thinking seems non existent, Apple's business practices and of the whole big tech undermines the ideas and principles of any capitalists, yet those capitalists don't even notice it, the double standards are impressive. It truly seems like a regression to feudal times

[-] fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com 1 points 1 week ago

Check out Fairphones.

this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
170 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

70031 readers
3560 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS