600
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] pyre@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

you know this is old because it's not spreading hate against trans people

[-] 58008@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago
[-] Anomalocaris@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago

isn't he a Christian chauvenist and has promoted great replacement theories?

[-] twice_hatch@midwest.social 6 points 1 day ago

No clue, I don't like him anymore cause he's said some transphobic stuff https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Views_of_Richard_Dawkins#LGBT_issues

Makes it hard to listen to that Nightwish album, I don't want to hear his spoken word part

I was an edgy atheist like 10 years ago, but it's pretty clear that having heroes is a bad idea. Now I'm a regular atheist

[-] Walk_blesseD 39 points 1 day ago

This guy is a complete and utter dick, so widely touted is his reputation as a critical thinker that he'll uncritically align himself with whichever rightoid project puts the word "critical" in its name.

[-] JayleneSlide@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Agreed, he's an absolutely controversial, problematic figure. But he did have a few cool, meaningful things to say. We can acknowledge that, right? Maybe share the high points with each other, along with the cautionary tale of Dawkins? I'm sure the stroke didn't help things either.

Maybe things aren't always black and white. And people can do both good and bad things, even at the same time. People such as John Lennon and Ghandi leap to mind.

Yeah, regardless of who said these words, it's still thought-provoking

[-] Mac@mander.xyz 24 points 1 day ago

I mean, tbh, if there were a real god, they probably wouldn't mind the minute details being different in different cultures.
They also probably wouldn't mind much whether or not you were a believer but more about how you conducted yourself.

If i were to decide to believe, it would be something more open like this.
But this doesnt solve the Logical Argument from Evil.

Besides, i hate this life and this world anyway, so fuck you, god. 🖕

[-] Zikeji@programming.dev 26 points 1 day ago

My main issue with the singular "God" portrayed in many mainstream religions is that it's billed as omnipotent and all powerful.

If a person has the ability to, through action, prevent great harm, and just ignores it - that is not the type of person I want to be, more or less "believe in". If you're all powerful and you allow children to be maimed for life, die young, starve, etc. - you aren't worth an ounce of my faith. And save the classic "but if he intervened it would interfere with our free will" bullshit.

I've considered religions with many gods, like Norse Paganism - I'm just not the religious type, but if I were, something where gods are fallible is much more believable.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

It seems to me that if there was an omnipotent and all powerful god that actually cared about what was going on, we'd have noticed by now (beyond vague pictures on burned toast).
I know all the usual explanations that are really poor ones too.

[-] EmpiricalDicktaster 4 points 1 day ago

I'd say the problem lies with God being portrayed as an authority by those that have an interest in maintaining power (capital), and by those that don't actually know God (those that have been misled by those that have an interest in maintaining power).

God is nature, greed is an anomaly, as it does not benefit nature, as there is already enough for everything and everyone in existence and no reason for greed. Unless one is greedy for the distractions created by capitalism and it's past incarnations, that have nothing to do with nature and God.

The great harm that must be prevented and is ignored is the power projected by us that is the inventor of all unnatural harm.

Those of the highest wealth are practically the gods in this system, against our actual will, that allow children to be maimed for life, die young, starve, etc..

God is the hostage of capital, God is made to act against the truth, that we all know, through us, as we are made to act against the truth, that we all know, by the authority projected by us.

[-] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

As above, so below. If we are truly made in God's image then He, by definition, must be as flawed as any of us.

[-] crt0o@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

Personally I'm not religious at all, but if I were to believe in a religion it would definitely be Buddhism. The fact it doesn't center around a god and denies the existence of a soul outright seems much more honest and realistic to me. Really, it's pretty fascinating how brutal and almost nihilist it is compared to other religions.

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And the dominant religion is always the same religion...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_religion

[-] PanArab@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

For all we know Kanamara Matsuri may be the true way to honour god but we just weren’t blessed enough to be born in Kawasaki

[-] match@pawb.social 2 points 1 day ago

to my understanding, that's what the baha'i faith calls progressive revelation

[-] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Kind of like Relativity and equivalence of frames of reference. Maybe we’re on to something- I’m waiting for my templeton Prize

this post was submitted on 04 May 2025
600 points (100.0% liked)

Just Post

845 readers
67 users here now

Just post something 💛

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS