709
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ArchaicHuman@lemmy.world 36 points 6 days ago

It’s backed by Bezos. Wouldn’t even consider it for that reason alone.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jaykrown@lemm.ee 36 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The design is bad. The front trunk is a bad use of space, and the Japanese figured this out decades ago with the Kei truck. If you want to see real utility, look at this design.

[-] ExtraPartsLeft@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago

The front trunk is a safety feature called a crumple zone and is objectively safer to be in a crash with.

[-] isaaclw@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

Hm. Interesting point.

Maybe as we move our economy away from cars, and people dont all have to be drivers, we could also move away from cars that are poorly designed specifically around bad drivers.

[-] jaykrown@lemm.ee 8 points 6 days ago

You need infrastructure to actually support an alternative, otherwise cars are a necessity for many people to get to work and the grocery store.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] BiteSizedZeitGeist@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

Americans won't buy a Kei truck though. Granted, the frunk is a marketing concession, but it's a fine one, if it can help push the market away from huge and expensive SUVs.

Or, more succinctly, don't let perfect be the enemy of good.

[-] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 11 points 6 days ago

Americans can't buy them new because of the so-called Chicken Tax. We can only import them if they're speed-governed, or at least 25 years old.

Even with those restrictions, lots of Americans want them, including me. There are quite a few importers bringing them over, including one that just started up in my area. They're desirable enough that major media outlets are running articles about how people who need to get real work done covet kei trucks.

Yes, Americans would buy them. Americans are buying them.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

Counterpoint: One of the first things people buy for a truck is a container for the bed for things they don't want to be in the weather but also not in the cab.

A front-trunk eliminates this need which also frees up bed space.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] OmegaMan@lemmings.world 18 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Crazy how so many people have been begging for bare bones, affordable electric vehicles.

Then when one comes on the scene they do nothing but complain. Can't please anybody these days it seems.

Edit: sp

[-] Bahnd@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago

They claim 20k, which is nice, but noone will believe it will stay that way. Given the [gestures broadly to everything] they likely will need to find an non-lithium based alternative battery before the reserves run dry, the price sky-rockets and then would-be buyers deal with scalper prices (not like thats much different than going to a dealership anyway).

This would have been a smash hit in 2022, but now its too little, too late.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] etuomaala@sopuli.xyz 22 points 6 days ago

I find this minimalism strangely appealing. Unfortunately, I do not live on a farm. I hope this thing is useful to those who do, though.

[-] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I pretty much do and I'm kinda stoked, cautiously

If I can have a Linux truck that works and can tow something if need be... I'm down

[-] admin@sh.itjust.works 9 points 6 days ago

Linux truck

And has to resemble the late 1970s-1980s body styles because of the kiss methodology. I'd love me a 1972 C10 or a 1981 F150 with Debian.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] tfm@europe.pub 19 points 6 days ago

I hate that Bezos backed them

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] ramsgrl909@lemmy.world 35 points 6 days ago

I am excited, this is what my husband and I have been waiting for - a regular vehicle with no bells and whistles just to raise the price

[-] Tillman@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago

Fun fact, this isn’t $20K but that’s what it takes to get people, to share the article. The actual arrival says that it’s $20K after government rebates in the US. So it’s actually expensive without tax dollars.

[-] TBi@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

I wonder how much petrol/diesel would cost if the government didn’t subsidise it. And if they were actually held liable for oil spills.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 38 points 6 days ago

(after federal incentives)

:|

[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 12 points 6 days ago

That's 25-27k for a new electric truck, that's not bad.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] b161 15 points 6 days ago

Lost me at “American”.

[-] Revan343@lemmy.ca 32 points 6 days ago

Damn, an electric truck I might actually want. It's a shame it's made in America

[-] Ulvain@sh.itjust.works 11 points 6 days ago

My exact thought! I wish a Canadian startup did exactly that, I'd buy one immediately

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Civil_Liberty@lemm.ee 26 points 6 days ago

This will never come to market. Perhaps in a different timeline, but not this one.

[-] demunted@lemmy.ml 22 points 6 days ago

Agree. Elon... Err Doge will change regulatory rules until they run out of money.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] uis@lemm.ee 14 points 6 days ago

no touchscreen

Sounds like a dream. Or public transport. It doesn't have touchscreen either.

[-] Uranus_Hz@lemm.ee 17 points 6 days ago
[-] ByteJunk@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago

You know, I like the design. If I can take a wrench to it and customise it or repair broken stuff easily and for cheap, even better.

The range is kinda meh, but for working in remote sites, bringing a diesel generator is already par for the course, and that bed looks like it fits a lot of stuff.

No stereo sucks though.

load more comments (36 replies)
[-] rumba@lemmy.zip 9 points 6 days ago

Hell yes, take my money. As long as it's not a limit and manages to keep its range and I can get parts fuck yes

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] reiterationstation@lemm.ee 17 points 6 days ago

Definitely interested…

[-] wanderwisley@lemm.ee 16 points 6 days ago

Please make a 4x4 model I will definitely buy one.

[-] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 17 points 6 days ago

they lost me at automatic high beams. we don't need more cars on the road with LED high beams blinding everybody within two kilometers

[-] Zenith@lemm.ee 20 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Automatic means they turn on and off automatically so it actually cuts down on the problem you’re describing

[-] Lemming_Observer@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago

That's the theory and it sounded great in the adverts. But in my experience, "automatic" means on by default and most folks don't think about them, creating the problem- we're all blind because the damn things come on too much. To work properly, they'll have to know where the city limits are, not just trigger at "x" lumens level. And while we're temporarily blinded, "Fooly Automasted Slef Driving" will probably kill us before that happens...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] lka1988@sh.itjust.works 10 points 6 days ago

I hate to break it to you bud, but pretty much every single vehicle sold in the last 5 years or so are equipped with LED headlights.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Witchfire@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I am physically unable to drive after sundown because those headlights fuck so hard with my light sensitivity. I can't see anything, it feels like someone slowly stabbing your eyes with a pencil.

Admittedly not the smartest thing to do, but I now keep a reflective umbrella in the car for when my partner is driving and one of those assholes decides to tailgate.

[-] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 9 points 6 days ago

Perfect except for it being a truck. Why is North America allergic to small cars?

[-] Lv_InSaNe_vL@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

Trucks are incredibly useful?

[-] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 7 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Sure but not every single person needs a truck? My comment isn’t even intending to hate on trucks, I literally just want a small car that’s electric. I don’t drive often and I want something that’s electric but doesn’t take up much space

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago

No stereo is fine if it has ports for me to just buy my own car stereo kit and add it afterwards. I don't see the point of no paint, like don't you need it to protect the metal from the environment

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] wowwoweowza@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago

Is it a networked surveillance nightmare?

[-] Rhusta@midwest.social 7 points 5 days ago

It doesn't seem to come with any gadgets. No touch screen, not even a radio. It's possible that it still broadcasts location data and it's possible they could hide a mic to record audio as well. But it isn't connecting to your phone with Bluetooth, it can't exploit the Bluetooth connection to scrub your messages and socials. So it's a LOT better than most new cars.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] peteyestee@feddit.org 4 points 5 days ago

Make it 10k-12k and it would be a yes if parts and repair ability were guaranteed for 10 years.

[-] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 days ago

Because a decafe old TN panel touchscreen and a lick of paint was what made cars 70k.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
709 points (100.0% liked)

News

29127 readers
3732 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS