101
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by zaxvenz@lemm.ee to c/europe@feddit.org

Speaking to the BBC, she said: "I understand why there's so much focus on our trading relationship with the US but actually our trading relationship with Europe is arguably even more important, because they're our nearest neighbours and trading partners.

https://archive.ph/oxPY3

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Maybe also because a deal with USA can be torn up by Trump at any moment! He did that with his own deal with Canada and Mexico!

USA should absolutely be considered secondary at best to most countries now. Kind of ironic, since Trump had the slogan America first. 🤥

[-] intelisense@lemm.ee 10 points 1 day ago

I think they might be mutually exclusive right now. For example, if any US trade deal includes chlorinated chicken, the EU is not going to let chicken into the EU from the UK.

[-] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

if any US trade deal includes chlorinated chicken

I don't think this will ever happen. I hope so!

[-] Kissaki@feddit.org 1 points 1 day ago

Having trade deals on both sides doesn't man you can ship whatever from one to the other.

They can trade over set of things with one, and another set with the other.

[-] intelisense@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

What to stop them, though? Ship it in, remove the label, export it.

[-] Kissaki@feddit.org 1 points 11 hours ago

While breaking the agreement? If they're breaking the agreement, what difference does it make where it comes from?

Mislabeling would be a problem no matter what they trade. And ultimately sabotage any trade deals.

[-] bob_lemon@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

Laws banning the mislabeling of products? A.k.a. label fraud?

[-] huppakee@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago

"Obviously I've been meeting Scott Bessent this week whilst I'm in Washington, but I've also this week met the French, the German, the Spanish, the Polish, the Swedish, the Finnish finance ministers - because it is so important that we rebuild those trading relationships with our nearest neighbours in Europe, and we're going to do that in a way that is good for British jobs and British consumers."

I do agree with her but I'm also calling bullshit because this is exactly what you'd say to improve your negotiation position. Note that she is already in Washington. She is trying to get a deal done. I mean good for her and I wish her and everyone in the UK all the best, but the UK tries to be the link between EU and US just like Meloni. They want best of both worlds (who doesn't).

The result of these talks will be the real news, this is just a cookie for the hungry journalists. A kind of fortune cookie that is meant as a message to the other guy at the negotiation table.

[-] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

I'm also calling bullshit because this is exactly what you'd say to improve your negotiation position.

Don't you understand that she must say such things then?

[-] huppakee@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

My point is exactly that her reason for saying this is because the fact she is negotiating, what I meant with calling bullshit is that I don't think this person is saying this from a genuine belief. Might be true that she thinks this, I just don't think she would have said it if she wasn't in a negotiation.

[-] LuckingFurker 6 points 1 day ago

Rare Reeves W. And the bar is insanely low at this point

[-] disgrunty@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 day ago

I'm sure she'll come out with something suitably evil and psychopathic to remind who she is very shortly.

[-] obvs@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It clearly is.

this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
101 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

5676 readers
514 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media. Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to any of the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS