68
submitted 1 month ago by DeadWorld@lemm.ee to c/brainworms@lemm.ee
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] alykanas@slrpnk.net 12 points 1 month ago

Everyone would be happier

[-] Stache_@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

It sounds like a good idea, but I’m not sure how efficiently it could be enforced. If a photo of someone wearing a certain brand of clothes is in a news article, does that count as advertising for that clothing brand? What if the news article goes viral?

[-] shadowedcross@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

I'm mainly concerned with paid for, intentional advertising, but yes, if there's an obvious brand logo in a news article's image, then it should be censored in some way, even if it's just blurred out.

[-] Sinaf@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I'd also think it would be better to create rules and regulations that are as clear cut as possible and almost impossible to circumvent.

Go after billboards first. I can turn off the TV and avoid websites that have too many ads. I should be able to ignore advertisements in the public space. Clear size limits, don't allow structures that will only be used for this specific purpose, etc.

[-] glebyglobster@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

It would be a much better world

this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2025
68 points (100.0% liked)

BrainWorms

1566 readers
29 users here now

Hey, welcome to BrainWorms.

This is a place where I post interesting things that I find and cant categorize into one of the main subs I follow. Enjoy a front seat as i descend into madness

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS