494
submitted 2 weeks ago by Irelephant@lemm.ee to c/wikipedia@lemmy.world

the devil works fast, but wikipedia writers work faster.

all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 110 points 2 weeks ago

👊🇺🇸🔥

(We’re destroying America with our bare hands. The fires are incidental)

[-] Trex202@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago

Not: Fist-bump about the burning flag?

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

fisting the flag’s ring of fire

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 75 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

American Conservatives in 2015: "Wikileaks is the greatest threat to domestic security! They'll destroy our reputation at home and threaten the safety of our brave men and women fighting abroad! Edward Snowden and Julian Assange and Reality Winner should be executed for high treason!"

American Conservatives in 2025: "Actually, it is incredibly cool to post Collateral Murder videos to the public group chat."

[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 57 points 2 weeks ago

That's pretty good. Someone needs to go through and add a bunch of citations, though. Wikipedia standards and all.

[-] MemmingenFan923@feddit.org 36 points 2 weeks ago

Kudos to the Wikipedia editors.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 34 points 2 weeks ago

53 people were killed.

None of the right ones though.

[-] Irelephant@lemm.ee 16 points 2 weeks ago

Did you mean: 👊🇺🇸🔥

[-] Montreal_Metro@lemmy.ca 27 points 2 weeks ago

These text messages are super cringe and so unprofessional.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 23 points 2 weeks ago

If this were pitched as an SNL skit it would have been thrown out of the writers room for being too unbelievable.

[-] kopasz7@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

Fiction has to seem plausible, rational even. Though, reality is anything but.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 18 points 2 weeks ago

The question is: Can the US government actually do something about this? The journalist had been invited, and probably no-one had reiterated to the group that the contents are top secret.

[-] thepresentpast@lemm.ee 30 points 2 weeks ago

They are supposed to have rigorous, thorough training about what types of channels are considered secure and legal, and which types of communications are secret, top secret, confidential, etc.

Discussing war plans is top secret and if the highest ranking members of our military don't understand that, we are all fucked. The thing is, they do know that, but they are obviously choosing to communicate on Signal so that all of their communications are off the record and undiscoverable, which is another primary reason that what they are doing is illegal and immoral.

[-] Maxxie 14 points 2 weeks ago

This is "proud boys"-level OPSEC 🙄

[-] atro_city@fedia.io 5 points 2 weeks ago

How is it possible that it took less than a day to add this, but when I add articles it takes months?

[-] laffytaffer@lemm.ee 11 points 2 weeks ago

Once you hit a certain threshold of account age/edit count, you don't have to go through the draft submission process, you can just add an article to mainspace. That said, unless you know what you're doing with writing an article, it'll probably get moved back to draftspace.

[-] atro_city@fedia.io 2 points 2 weeks ago

Thank you for a proper explanation 🙏

[-] Irelephant@lemm.ee 7 points 2 weeks ago

Its highly topical, so it could have been prioritised.

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

Notability?

[-] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 weeks ago

I think you know why

this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
494 points (100.0% liked)

Wikipedia

2636 readers
106 users here now

A place to share interesting articles from Wikipedia.

Rules:

Recommended:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS