2099
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by miss_demeanour@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/enoughmuskspam@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] OldChicoAle@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

So billionaires can take daddy's money but not the poors? Got it.

[-] Jhuskindle@lemmy.world 45 points 2 days ago

The money THEOR PARENTS PAID INTO AND WORKED TOWARDS. They are literally entitled to it. It is their parent money!!!

[-] recall519@lemm.ee 41 points 2 days ago

Warning everyone that I could not find a source for this and this Twitter post isn't any evidence in itself. So if you're saying I told you so, then you're just as susceptible as the people who believe $300m was being sent to 11yos without any explanation.

[-] HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works 41 points 2 days ago

I found two sources for this info.

https://en.as.com/latest_news/bad-news-for-social-security-beneficiaries-this-new-proposal-would-stop-payments-to-170000-people-n/ says:

Who could see their Social Security benefits stopped?

Government Executive reports that the SSA memo proposes ceasing payments that are made to people without Social Security numbers. While people without an SSN are not eligible to receive Social Security benefits of their own, there are scenarios where they can accept benefits on behalf of an eligible person who does have an SSN as that person’s “representative payee.”

A link in that text goes to https://www.govexec.com/management/2025/03/ssa-weighs-axing-payments-170000-beneficiaries/403740/ and it gives an example:

That task could be arduous, as finding payees is already so difficult that at times the agency turns to institutional payees like child welfare agencies, said Romig. SSA staff also have to assess the suitability of payees.

“Say you’re a kid and you don’t have a payee for a while — they stop paying the benefit until they sort it out,” she said of the potential for interruptions to benefits.

It may be that the OP read that and extrapolated it to mean orphans would be cut off ... which may or may not be true.

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] korazail@lemmy.myserv.one 1 points 1 day ago

You think children are getting undeserved money from the government.

I think children are getting money from the government.

We are not the same.

Regardless of evidence provenance, children need to be our most sacred class of people, followed by the elderly and disabled. It shouldn't even be a question about how and why we take care of them, we just fucking should.

Misinformation is real, so I see part of your point, but the people outraged at this are WILDLY different from the people outraged that kids might be getting money they don't "deserve". Can we not just be nice to each other? This isn't actually a zero-sum game.

[-] recall519@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

No, I actually think SBA lenders are not sending any money to 11yos. I think this is most likely a record keeping error.

I do also think the Twitter post is confusing SSA and SBA. The SSA sending social security I am 100% for. SBA lenders sending money to business I am also 100%, even if they are 11yos. I just think it is highly unlikely that in a single year, banks decided to loan an unprecedented $300m to 11yos and that those thousands of loans all had mismatching names with their SSNs.

I'm just saying everyone shouldn't go rallying behind this person who is making claims without any evidence. It's just as dumb as DOGE.

[-] ansiz@lemmy.world 53 points 2 days ago

Is there a source for this, I'm genuinely interested in reading more about this but can't find a source.

[-] frostysauce@lemmy.world 44 points 2 days ago

It's a screenshot of a tweet, I don't know what further proof you could want. Did you not see the blue checkmark? /s

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] crapwittyname@lemm.ee 22 points 2 days ago

They've also cut PEPFAR. PEPFAR is a program which, among other things, provides antiretrovirals to people with HIV/AIDS in poorer countries. Approximately twenty million people, including half a million children will now start to slowly die without access to these drugs.

[-] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

For comparison's sake, Hitler killed 13.6 million people. History is very likely to end up remembering Trump as the single deadliest regime in history.

That's some Heritage Foundation level of undercutting Hitler's death toll.

[-] DeusUmbra@lemmy.world 107 points 2 days ago

This only ends one way, with nooses and guillotines. It is up to the people how quickly it ends.

[-] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 31 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I pulled up next to a guy the other day and the passenger looked like Elon at first glance. My first thought was if I could shoot him in the face and escape long enough to at least make a few phone calls. That's how much this guy deserves to be deleted. I'd risk my life to end it all.

[-] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 27 points 2 days ago

Elon Musk is ultra paranoid for a reason. He has 20 bodyguards on a normal day and also has a secret service detail. He is not an easy target.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Apocalypteroid@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

Yep. C'mon America. How long you gonna let these nazis fuck you?

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Brutticus@lemm.ee 22 points 2 days ago

Please, Smithers, who are they going to complain to? Their parents?

[-] LoonyTrix@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago

Need to see a better source than a tweet that I can't find.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 191 points 3 days ago

Thanks for making it national news, major national media. Good work.

[-] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Elon after labeling orphans as fraudsters and taking away their survivor benefits that they are entitled to and deserve: "God, I just sniffle I don't understand why people hate me crocodile tears"

[-] RizzoTheSmall@lemm.ee 13 points 2 days ago

The best part is how his efficiency improvements will cost the government half a trillion dollars 😆

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 146 points 3 days ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] yournamehere@lemm.ee 30 points 2 days ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

well then it is settled he is the embodiment of orphan crushing machine

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago

Talking about Odious Lusting After Fortunes

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 79 points 3 days ago

I'm sure he'll be super bummed about it whenever he wakes up from his latest k-nap.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] PumpkinEscobar@lemmy.world 57 points 3 days ago

I'm really interested to see any reputable articles confirming this. Google searches didn't show anything, 1 press conference on Reddit, 1 instagram post

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 56 points 3 days ago
[-] snf@lemmy.world 65 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

For those experiencing the same confusion as myself: those are not sources for the orphan/survivor benefits story, they're possible reasons why the media might not be reporting the story.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] xye@lemm.ee 29 points 2 days ago

Musk saying the words “social security” might have been the best thing that could have happened tbh. A conservative family member of mine was at an Indivisible meeting today - I think the republicans might be in for a bit of a shit show, if you can believe it

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] jaybone@lemmy.world 40 points 3 days ago

How much does an orphaned 8 year old get a month from social security? I would assume that all goes directly to the orphanage or foster home?

What is he supposed to pay his own rent and not drop $2k on Paw Patrol.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 58 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Did they actually cut it off? (Even if temporarily?)

Yeah, I am not doubting that this happened, because in the mix of callousness and incompetence on display, it isn't unlikely. But a source would be much appreciated, still.

[-] ArchRecord@lemm.ee 54 points 3 days ago

Here's a Snopes review of what I think is the same specific topic.

It mentions nothing about these being orphan support payments, but rather, these being possibly incorrectly typed SSNs that resulted in their recordkeeping systems assuming, based on the information tied to those SSNs, that the borrowers were, say, 11 years old, when in actuality they were not, and the SSNs had just been inputted incorrectly, even if all other borrower information was accurate.

They also didn't stop these funds, as they were already given out. They're simply "reviewing" them.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
2099 points (100.0% liked)

Enough Musk Spam

2821 readers
585 users here now

For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.

No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.

Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.

Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.

Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS