140

I would understand if Canonical want a new cow to milk, but why are developers even agreeing to this? Are they out of their minds?? Do they actually want companies to steal their code? Or is this some reverse-uno move I don't see yet? I cannot fathom any FOSS project not using the AGPL anymore. It's like they're painting their faces with "here, take my stuff and don't contribute anything back, that's totally fine"

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

I assume this is in reference to the rust coreutils being MIT-licensed. How would using GPL benefit them?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] lengau@midwest.social 4 points 3 months ago

Canonical still licenses most of their stuff under GPL3, including new stuff. The license (other than it being open) was probably not even a consideration in deciding to experiment with uutils.

[-] jaypatelani@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

I like BSDs more than GPL just personal choice

[-] ReakDuck@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

Squeek, squack. Your opinion is whack

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
140 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

55692 readers
825 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS