927

Time to break free of traditional political ideological labeling and divisions. Time to abandon old, divisive sociopolitical labels like "liberal" and "conservative".

A new political party based on a vastly, commonly held virtures lends itself to embrace over 66% of Americans, and it clearly embraces progressive principled thinking. In the most ideal American sense of unity, a political party should not be able to be defined or placed as "to the left" or "to the right" of where the Democratic or Republican parties currently are. Just let it exist organically based on present-day principled thinking. The American Progressive Majority.


Originally Posted By u/Atlanticbboy At 2025-03-23 04:38:18 AM | Source


(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] vvilld@50501.chat 7 points 1 week ago

I appreciate and agree with the sentiment, but I think a call to form an entirely new political party demonstrates a naivety with regards to how the American political system works. It's just not going to happen. A third party will NEVER displace one of the two major parties without massive changes to the electoral system that would likely require a Constitutional Amendment.

Our system and political culture is just not structured to allow for 3rd parties. What's more, the 2 major parties have ingrained themselves into the system so much that they have MASSIVE institutional advantages over a 3rd party.

This will never be a successful effort. I think a better goal would be to co-opt and take over the Democratic Party, booting out all the Vichy collaborationists like Schumer, Jefferies, Newsom, Adams, Pelosi, etc, and remaking the party.

With a new 3rd party, best case scenario is it has 0 impact. If it does get any votes, it'll just divide the anti-fascist vote with the Democrats (and any other 3rd parties) making it even more difficult to win.

[-] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago

"Democracy will just never work, the king won't allow it"

[-] vvilld@50501.chat 3 points 1 week ago

That's not what I'm saying at all. I'm saying play the game to win. Don't start with a losing strategy.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Manticore@beehaw.org 7 points 1 week ago

You'd want to avoid using the word 'progressive' because it's already become a shorthand.

People will vote against things they want (ACA) over terms they hate (Obamacare).

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Me% would love it if everyone were able to attend higher education. History gets sugarcoated in grade school. Once you make it to college, you get to learn all the good stuff.

[-] CherryBullets@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I'll be real with you, in depth WWII history should be taught in high school, as well as political spectrums like dictatorships. Where I'm from, I saw images of concentration camp victims when I was 15, in class. I saw how starved they were in pictures and in videos. Saw the piles of clothes, shoes, tooth fillings, etc. Saw the camps themselves and Hitler speeches that we studied. We were presented the US anti-propaganda film, "Don't Be A Sucker" as well to home in how dangerous dictator cult speeches are.

It did affect me a lot to learn about these things and the harsh reality of human cruelty, but it was also a good lesson to ingrain in us kids. Repeating this is a worse nightmare than being educated about it. I'm always shocked when I meet Americans that got the bare minimum education on WWII with 0 understanding of the how it happened. It's actually shocking.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Also, c'mon! Everyone in my community pays at least $10,000.00 a year in taxes but somehow that's not enough to patch up all the holes on the road.

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 week ago

Maybe the actual solution is not lying to and brainwashing children.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 10001110101@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

Meh, I'm guessing there already is some small party that ticks all those boxes. I'm guessing independents, or some random party could win certain local races if the Dem and Rep are both very unpopular, and the media gives them air time (that may be hard). Unfortunately, I don't think the next presidential election will be valid election, and I don't think the state-level elections in red states will be valid either. Having other parties can be useful for getting messaging out (again, if the media gives them air-time), but the country looks like it's going full fascist, which will probably need mass direct action, or war, to unseat.

[-] Jumi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

And yet you all vote for two right wing parties if you even go.

[-] all4theTomatoes@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

I believe this will achieve exactly nothing. The whole system is rigged against the people, neither the republicans nor the democrats (aside from a few sore thumbs) work for the interest of the people. And you can bet you're bottom dollar if there ever was a new political party the democrats and republicans will work hand-in-hand to prevent this new party from taking power.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2025
927 points (100.0% liked)

/r/50501 Mirror

653 readers
1290 users here now


Mirrored /r/50501 Popular Posts


founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS