635
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 97 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm really furious at this. I bought a bunch in the past two years as that's my go-to brands for my backup solutions. And in the past week, had to buy different brands to diversify.

My main takeaway:

Don't buy SanDisk. Don't buy Western Digital.

I don't care if it's only a few models. I'm not risking my data.

[-] jsh@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 year ago

Every drive in my computer: NVME, SSD, and HDD is a WD drive. 🫣

[-] nurple@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

So far these issues only apply to these specific SSDs ... fingers crossed it stays that way, because like you I've got a number of WD HDDs in my life.

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

WD got in trouble not too long ago for deceptively marketing shingled drives as conventional. Back to back issues like this is going to leave a lasting impression on the kinds of people who buy drives.

[-] nurple@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I agree, I don’t buy WD drives any more. But I don’t want to replace the ones I already have unless it’s necessary.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Potatos_are_not_friends@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"so far" is the operative word.

You really don't want to discover you're suddenly part of the 2024 list of drives that also are corrupt.

[-] xantoxis@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I think the key thing here is that older drives you already own are probably ok. At least if they're a year old or so.

[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 year ago

And frankly, your data should never be in question. Short of a drive failure where the whole drive dies, which would require data recovery services, your data should be safely stored. IMO that's the premise of data storage; and bluntly, it's the only job it has... To store, keep, and retrieve data when asked.

If it cannot do that, or has any nontrivial risk of being unable to do that, then it's not worth the plastics that make up the case. Unless you're using the drive as a temp/scrub/whatever disk, it's unusable in my opinion.

[-] JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I used to only buy WD Reds for my NAS, until they secretly switched them to SMR. I agree that no one should buy from WD anymore.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 46 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


In May, Ars Technica reported about customer complaints that claimed SanDisk Extreme SSDs were abruptly wiping data and becoming unmountable.

Ian Sloss, one of the lawyers representing Matthew Perrin and Brian Bayerl in a complaint filed yesterday, told Ars he doesn't believe class-action certification will be a major barrier in a case "where there is a common defect in the firmware that is consistent in all devices."

Perrin and Bayerl's complaint mentions the 2TB Extreme, which Western Digital hasn't officially confirmed as an affected device.

Jafri's complaint says he bought an Extreme Pro (capacity not specified) because he was on an extended van trip and needed storage for drone footage, photos, and travel mementos.

The cases seek restitution, including damages, and for Western Digital to stop selling the affected drives until they're fixed or the problems are fully disclosed on all labels, packaging, and advertising.

Sloss told Ars that challenges of the case might include establishing how frequently drives failed after Western Digital shared its May firmware update.


The original article contains 771 words, the summary contains 168 words. Saved 78%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Never_Sm1le@lemdro.id 37 points 1 year ago

Me with 2 WD HDDs and 2 Sandisk SD card: this is fine

[-] BetaDoggo_@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

The complaints are only about a specific line of external ssds. You're fine.

[-] GamingChairModel@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

The complaints are about this specific line, but reflect poorly on the business decisions going into that line, which in turn makes it hard to trust those same managers not to make anti-consumer choices in the future. I'm not going to take my WD/Sandisk drives out of use early, but I'm probably done buying new ones from them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] spoon00@lemm.ee 36 points 1 year ago

Back in the day, working with WD was a nightmare. The spinning HDs never came with a keyed IDE cable. It must have saved them $.0001 per HD shipped. If you accidentally put the cable in backwards, it not only burned out the logic board on the WD HD, it would also burn out any other drives on the cable. And the IDE controller on the motherboard. Now it is easy to remember how to do it right. Install the power cable and then make sure the red wire on the power cable was next to the red wire (pin 1) on the IDE cable. But if you rush or make an assumption, that was an expensive mistake.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

This sounds like maybe early 90's possibly without voltage regulators at the molex connector. I've been doing this a very long time and have never heard of this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml 32 points 1 year ago

I've thought WD was sleezy ever since they secretly switched from CMR drives to SMR drives, including in their NAS products (for which SMR drives are particularly unsuitable). So this doesn't surprise me at all.

People need to stop buying WD drives and buy Seagate instead. They had their own SMR scandal, but at least they never put them in their NAS drives.

[-] NewSmileadon@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

From someone who isn't tech savvy this sounds like star trek jargon

[-] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Ehhhh, you aren't far off. Star Trek jargon was literally made up by the actors and writers, at least according to some of the original cast, with them mimicking the technical jargon that their friends in technical careers, especially electrical engineers, were using at the time.

[-] krakenx@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I am tech savvy and I've never heard of SMR or CMR. After reading up on it, I don't think it really matters. SMR is newer technology, and is maybe more reliable in the short term, but the drives fail faster because of the extra wear and tear, and the drives are slower than CMR.

https://history-computer.com/smr-vs-cmr-hard-drives/

Edit: I missed that SMR is supposed to be worse, despite being newer. So I guess WD is putting slower and sooner failing drives out to save a buck.

[-] derpgon@programming.dev 14 points 1 year ago

I used to buy Seagate, but they broke twice or thrice as fast as WD. But that was 8-10 years ago. Are they better now?

[-] Zeron@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I've been using ironwolf/exos drives for years without any issues. The 3TB fiasco runs deep and people need to just let it go.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] krakenx@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Seagate drives should never be used outside of a RAID because the failure rate is so high.

WD is absolutely abusing their power as the only reliable spinning HDD company left, but I have no choice but to continue to buy their increasing overpriced drives because there is no alternative.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] terminhell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Just a reminder of the 3-2-1 backup model.

Semi important things are backed up to my home server. Super important stuff is also stored on a big name cloud service.

Also, don't forget paper exists. For smaller documents, it could be worth printing them, and putting them in a water/fire resistant safe.

[-] ALostInquirer@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Also, don’t forget paper exists. For smaller documents, it could be worth printing them, and putting them in a water/fire resistant safe.

Before paper, and somewhere in-between the digital and analogue, maybe go weird with discs or magnetic tape drives (if you're really into your electromagnetic data storage)?

And for the sillier side to this: don't forget to laser etch the most important records in stone. Don't think it's worth the trouble? Wouldn't have some of our ancient records if they weren't literally carved in stone, so...Incidentally, would anyone happen to know of any personal robotic stone engraving tools one could get?

Would be fun to pass in some text and let a machine go to work on some stray stones.

[-] Phanatik@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

I'm so glad I use crucial SSDs

[-] DarkenLM@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Are crucial SSDs good? I've been pondering getting a new SSD lately, but with this news I'm starting to lose hope on WD.

[-] NecessaryWeevil@feddit.nl 14 points 1 year ago

Crucial and Samsung have good reputations.

[-] dmmeyournudes@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Samsung literally just had an SSD drama with their recent drives burning through write cycles and killing the drive.

[-] TheDarkKnight@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Yeah Samsung is honestly garbage these days trading on their former reputation for quality. They have horrible, I mean the WORST QA, out of any major brand across the their markets. You have a greater chance of having an issue than not, they do not have any sort of decent RMA process and will just provide patchwork “fixes” consistently until someone’s product runs out of warranty. There is a legendary story of someone trying to get their G5 Flagship Gaming Monitor fixed and sent it in like 13 times and NEVER getting his product fixed or replaced until they hit the warranty deadline. The SSD issue from earlier this year is another great example of complete incompetence.

I would NEVER consider a Samsung product given the alternatives. They all have great specs and you have a 50/50 shot of getting a “good” one but that’s still a ton of risk for a premium priced product.

[-] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

Crucial is a budget brand. Samsung is the complete opposite (in regards to SSDs).

[-] lemann@lemmy.one 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Crucial is a budget brand

Where did you hear this?

The MX500 is pretty much the market leader as far as older SATA SSDs are concerned, with PLP capacitors, very generous NAND overprovisioning, and an onboard DRAM cache if I'm not mistaken.

The BX series is pretty budget oriented though, those are just standard 3D nand SSDs with no PLP, no DRAM.

If storage TBs are the concern, Samsung absolutely offers higher capacities than the MX series last time I checked

Edit: forgot the most important piece of info... Crucial is essentially Micron, the RAM and SSD manufacturer. They only sell things that Micron manufactures, so they don't sell SD cards, blank CDs and other generic storage stuff

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Let's hope Samsung's general quality issues won't reach their SSD market.

[-] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 5 points 1 year ago

Huh, my crucial SATA SSD was more expensive than the Samsung equivalent when I bought it a few years ago.

[-] HollandJim@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That’s all US lawsuits - any I should know about in the EU?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Chewget@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

Happened to one of my passports. All wiped won't connect

[-] Num10ck@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

You keep using that word Extreme. I do not think it means what you think it means.

[-] kaitco@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

This reminds me that I need to do my bi-annual backup of all my drives.

…onto WD HDDs no less. 😏

[-] dinckelman@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I haven't bought a WD drive over reliability concerns for quite a few years now, but now it makes sense too. I've seen way too many reports of Sandisk drives failing, with the news swept under the rug, and that's very on brand for WD to do

[-] itscozydownhere@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I’ve got an older 500GB one that has been going strong for years. But yeah I just bought a Crucial

[-] Espi@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Wow, I really like WD SSDs, I got an SN850X and it's blazing fast. I really like that you can change the sector size as well, most SSDs don't bother with 4k sectors and just leave you with 512b ones.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
635 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

58177 readers
2577 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS