341
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] arararagi@ani.social 36 points 2 days ago

Not on this political climate.

[-] MehBlah@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Came here to say something like this. Its clear that we will not get anything that benefits the real citizens.

[-] dinckelman@lemmy.world 58 points 2 days ago

I've learned from my mistakes with Google IoT. Unless I can host things myself, preferably even before the product inevitably dies, i'm not even considering it

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 54 points 2 days ago

How about getting forced to go open source when they abandon a product?

[-] erytau@programming.dev 22 points 2 days ago

Too risky. Who knows what's hiding in their code. Might be some copylefted library or a piece of code that's been copy-pasted into the project without fully complying with the copyleft requirements. Making sure this isn't the case and/or cleaning up an abandoned project can be costly and complicated. Easier for them to just kill it.

[-] jim3692@discuss.online 2 points 1 day ago

Are you describing WinAmp ?

[-] oxysis@lemm.ee 5 points 2 days ago

I love the distaste for the word that is opposite of left/the side of the political spectrum where fascism resides

[-] Goretantath@lemm.ee 14 points 2 days ago

There is actualy a definition for the term "copyleft".

[-] brot@feddit.org 6 points 2 days ago

The problem is that many companies can't do that as they can't give you their custom server code. The only solution here would be to change design from the beginning so that devices can work without servers and are also so secure that they don't need security updates

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

That is the point: The pure threat of being forced to open that code could shift the business model to not have proprietary server / cloud code at all.

[-] toothbrush 46 points 2 days ago

No they dont, not with the current american administration.

[-] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Whoever pays the most money makes the rules. I mean, it was always like that but they don't have to hide it nearly as much.

[-] kibiz0r@midwest.social 4 points 2 days ago

They convinced a good chunk of the country that it’s a good thing.

[-] DFX4509B_2@lemmy.org 8 points 2 days ago

Good thing the end of Windows support isn't the end of the story for PC at least.

[-] fubarx@lemmy.world 11 points 2 days ago

Most IoT devices that died did so because the vendor went out of business and had to shut off the servers. Most lived in hope that a last minute investment would keep them afloat. In a few other cases, it was the middleware software provider (like Google IoT) that shut down and bricked a device.

This legislation might apply to a big company that decides to discontinue a product line and could then send notices out, but most startups won't know (or admit defeat) till the last possible moment. By then it's too late.

this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2025
341 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

66465 readers
3474 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS