1464
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] tonntaalainn@lemmy.world 1 points 49 minutes ago

Boycott these bastids

[-] jk1006@feddit.org 30 points 16 hours ago

I am from Germany and it is just sad how many people use these apps from shit companies without thinking, when suitable alternatives exist everywhere. Just use Firefox, it will work for 99,9% without any flaw. I would love to ditch WhatsApp, but could only convinge a few people to change to Signal. It is as easy as downloading a new app to prevent supporting Meta, but that's too much effort for many :-(

[-] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

Actually as much as I’d love to use Firefox all the time, there are many times it won’t work properly at all. This isn’t entirely Mozilla’s fault, but it is the case.

it will work for 99,9% without any flaw

Unfortunately not anymore.

And it doesn't help, that Mozilla is also slowly turning towards enshittification... (since they fired all servo devs...)

[-] Pixel101a@lemm.ee 4 points 13 hours ago

People not using Firefox is Mozilla's fault. Just look at how their mobile browser performs. It's so much worse than any chromium browser.

[-] DrQuickbeam@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago

I've been using Firefox mobile since they enabled extensions on it a little over a year ago on my Pixel 9 and haven't had any performance issues with it. My only complaint is that it doesn't handle form auto fills, or opening links associated with apps as well as chrome, but I think that's because of chrome's inherent ties into the OS. I prefer Opera on desktop for the UI and features.

[-] NewDay@feddit.org 2 points 13 hours ago

I use Firefox mobile since they support extensions but I have to admit that mobile browsers that are based on Geckoview are worse than browsers that are based on Blink.

Mozilla said that they want to concentrate their power on the mobile version, but I could not find the statement anymore.

[-] Zzyzx 10 points 16 hours ago

It's really annoying to me that Firefox doesn't seem to work well on my chromebook, so I'm stuck with Chrome until I need a new computer...

[-] John@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)
[-] Zzyzx 2 points 16 hours ago

I've considered that before. I'm just not sure I'm proficient enough to be able to do that on my own. I can apparently buy laptops with Linux as the OS from a tech store where I live, so I may eventually go that route.

[-] dzsimbo@lemm.ee 2 points 6 hours ago

Hey, don't do that. I mean you can, sure, and it'll be a cheaper solution (by just a fraction) to omit the windows license.

If you haven't dipped your toes into Linux yet, but want to, do it on a machine where you aren't too worried if you screw the OS up and have to build a new one, it is not an extraordinary pain (like you had you're work there, only copies of your game saves, ecetera).

I'd screw around with the Chromebook, and when I'm good and ready, get a more powerful notebook.

I'm not sure about all flavors of Linux, but installing most is easier than windows. And if you luck out, you won't have to bring up the console, the new distros are so friggin tight. But I guess that is where the heart of it all is. I am super happy with Endeavour OS, and I mostly just copy paste commands (that I'm understanding better and better, the more I use it).

[-] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago

Chrome? I've heard of that once.

[-] jam_scot@lemmy.world 18 points 19 hours ago

I switched to Firefox many years ago, after their announcement I switched to Waterfox and I'm very happy with it.

[-] Krompus@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

I've been on Firefox since 2004, trying Waterfox right now and it seems very nice. I was surprised to see that it supports Firefox Sync, took me less than ten minutes to make it comfy. Now I'm wondering about that; perhaps I should disable Firefox Sync?

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] MindlessHunter4@sh.itjust.works 21 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

Glad I don't use chrome anymore. Though unfortunately everyone else I know still does.

[-] knexcar@lemmy.world 65 points 1 day ago

This is probably the single thing that got me to switch to Firefox. Privacy whatever, I don’t care about my data or the morality of my tech company or whatever, but mess with my adblocker and goodbye.

[-] stevedice@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 day ago

Can I have your bank account username and password?

load more comments (14 replies)
[-] Jimius@lemmy.ml 110 points 1 day ago

if ads were normal and unobtrusive. We wouldn't need ad blockers. Instead we get an almost unusable internet where ads take up more and more real estate. I had been running an ad blocker for so many years that when a friend (who doesn't use an ad blocker) showed me a website, the unfiltered experience was horrifying.

[-] g4nd41ph@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago

I swapped to Chrome years ago because YouTube stopped working right on Firefox.

I've started the process of swapping back to Firefox after 10 years with Chrome over this.

[-] karma@feddit.uk 4 points 15 hours ago

If they break youtube in alternative browsers or force ads I'll finally be able to ditch youtube for good.

[-] Ledericas@lemm.ee 18 points 1 day ago

never had a problem with firefox and youtube

[-] ysjet@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

I know what he's talking about- there was some javascript spec or something that google proposed, and nobody else bought in, so it never actually became part of javascript's standard.

But google implemented it into chrome's javascript engine anyway, and then used it for youtube. There was some fallback code if the new functions weren't available, but, because of a 'mistake' they didn't work and basically made playback ass for a while until the open source community basically debugged and fixed the issue FOR google, and then spent a few weeks cramming it down google's throat that it needed fixed.

[-] bearboiblake@pawb.social 12 points 22 hours ago

google does this kinda shit on purpose to reinforce their market position

[-] Scrollone@feddit.it 4 points 19 hours ago

One of the many reasons why Google should be splitted into different companies

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

The only problem I've had is that you can't view HDR content in YouTube on Firefox.

That's not a big part of YouTube (yet), so it is largely unnoticeable.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Pulsar@lemmy.world 10 points 23 hours ago

Webserial is only reason I see to install Chrome. For everything else Firefox works great.

[-] Kekzkrieger@feddit.org 63 points 1 day ago
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 3 points 18 hours ago

That was a loud ball drop from Google’s hands.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
1464 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

66067 readers
4624 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS