785
Freedom software (sopuli.xyz)
submitted 1 day ago by cm0002@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] medicsofanarchy@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Upvoted for the "The Founder" reference.

[-] thelefthandpath@lemm.ee 5 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Hope your third-party antivirus is fully updated

[-] Tillman@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

Just as unhealthy as the food hes eating in the image so it works for me.

[-] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 40 points 18 hours ago

Hot take: I hate when software just extracts an executable.
Fucking install it so that it's registered with the software updater and uninstaller. Don't make me remember that I have to go hunting in the folder to delete this one app.

[-] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 3 points 42 minutes ago

Assuming you are on Windows, the proper install method is to run

winget install -e --id BlenderFoundation.Blender

[-] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 minutes ago

Cool, that doesn't help because I don't actually want blender.

I'm commenting on how much I hate when software is provided as just a portable executable.

I know that a lot of the time they're also provided as flatpaks or debs or in snap or windows app store, or Apple app store, etc.
But I'm talking about doing the thing that is being described in the image: unpacking a portable executable.

[-] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 hours ago

Kind of a moot point since most windows programs don't have a centralized hub for updates either, even when "properly installed" in program files.

[-] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 2 points 50 minutes ago

Not really moot, no.

A portable executable can have neither of those things. It also won't show up in the start menu app list.

With an installer, it'll at least show up in the uninstaller, with an install size that I can see when I'm looking to uninstall things, and it'll at least show up in the app list.

But they could also package it through the app store where you get all that plus centralized update management.
But I'd be happy with just having it show up in the app list and uninstaller.

[-] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 1 points 11 minutes ago

It absolutely can, I have several portable apps with self updating ability built in, when I use them it prompts me if I want to update or not, I personally appreciate that in certain cases.

I do dislike when they throw config files all over the place, so cleanup becomes very messy if I need to remove something.

Again tho, natively on windows there isn't a great way to do that anyway, the windows store sucks and not many will use the package managers via cmd either.

[-] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 minutes ago

I'm gonna be a bit rude here because you're not reading what I wrote.

I did not say that such apps cannot be updated, I said that they're not updated through a central update manager. So I don't give a flying fuck if you implemented your own custom app updater in your app because that's clearly and explicitly not what I'm talking about.

I also don't give a fuck about throwing config files all over the place, since a) the uninstall script takes care of that and b) this doesn't have to be specific to windows. Having an installer doesn't mean that configs must be thrown everywhere. Afaict apt-get isn't throwing files everywhere.

Again I don't really give a fuck about windows, but saying it hat it's not possible because people don't use the tool that makes it possible is fucking inane bullshit. Idk why you think the windows store "sucks" and I don't really give a fuck, it works fine as a user, even if I don't personally use it.

[-] MonkderVierte@lemmy.ml 15 points 7 hours ago
  1. You don't need an uninstaller if deleting the folder suffices
  2. You don't want some software to update.
[-] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 1 points 54 minutes ago

I know I don't NEED an uninstaller. I want to use the uninstaller I already have for all my other apps.

Let me have a consistent user experience.
Automatically figure out the right spot for the app resources and set the appropriate file permissions.
Show up in the list of installed applications, so I can sort them by size, if I'm running out of space.
Don't make me jump through hoops or know the magical directory I need to put it in, in order to have it show up in the start menu or app drawer.

[-] pHr34kY@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

AppImage is absolute chaos. Like, there's an entire application floating on my desktop and it doesn't have an icon, doesn't appear in my list of apps, doesn't update and has its own copy of libraries that are on my system, but aren't managed or updated.

It's even better when I can't find a program that I thought I had installed. I go on the internet, find the site, and realise it's appimage. I download the file just to find I already had it, and it was in my downloads directory.

Just package your program properly FFS.

[-] vithigar@lemmy.ca 21 points 16 hours ago

Some people prefer it.

I maintain a small piece of Windows software and originally just provided an installer, but I received enough requests for it that now when I publish releases I provide both an installer and a zipped portable build.

[-] elfin8er@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

This is the way!

[-] kopasz7@sh.itjust.works 15 points 16 hours ago

Having no package manager be like:

[-] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 119 points 1 day ago

The 2024 animated movie Flow was done entirely in Blender. It is an incredible movie, highly recommend.

[-] AdrianTheFrog@lemmy.world 53 points 1 day ago

Blender was also used a bit in Everything Everywhere All At Once

[-] Gormadt 6 points 9 hours ago

And Into the Spiderverse for some stuff

[-] OR3X@lemm.ee 78 points 1 day ago

Running FOSS on closed source systems. Classic.

[-] azertyfun@sh.itjust.works 54 points 18 hours ago

Running Linux on closed source hardware. Classic.

I bet you aren't even using your own open RISC-V based SBC, with fully open-source peripherals. Is your computer monitor even running an open-source firmware or are you just a FOSS poser?

[-] morrowind@lemmy.ml 43 points 16 hours ago

Using computers with closed source biology. Classic.

I bet you haven't even engineered your own DNA-II, fully-sequenced, libre-licensed microbiome with open source biochemical pathways. Are your eyes even running an open-source neural firmware, or are you just a FOSS poser?

[-] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 6 hours ago

Using computers with closed source biology. Classic.

Hey now, biology is pretty definitively open source. Every generation produces small patches of varying quality (mutations) and for most organisms the source is freely distributed to create new builds (reproduction). I mean if no one is downloading your genetic repo that's largely a you problem (natural selection) not a biology problem.

[-] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 hours ago

The documentation fucking sucks tho,

[-] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 28 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Using biology on closed source chemistry. Classic. I bet you didn't even roll your own proton mass or bother configuring your own valence shells. Are you even running your own coulomb law policies, or are you just a FOSS poser?

[-] rosco385@lemm.ee 21 points 13 hours ago

I don't have a witty reply, but these kinds of threads were the best part of reddit. So glad to have shitposters like you all here on Lemmy.

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 64 points 1 day ago

It'a a start! Makes the switch much easier.

[-] herrvogel@lemmy.world 25 points 22 hours ago

No. You either go full Stallman and inject Gentoo directly into your aorta, or you might as well be deep throating Satya Nutella while bouncing on Tim Apple's lap. Filthy casual.

[-] kittenzrulz123 9 points 21 hours ago

Noob, I snort pure Colombian and run LFS directly in my brain using the power of cryptic dreams and messages handed down to me directly by Lord RMS

[-] thickertoofan@lemm.ee 2 points 6 hours ago

Noob, i flick electrons

[-] null@slrpnk.net 6 points 19 hours ago

So you're saying your prefrontal cortex doesn't even have a Holy C✝ compiler? Terry looks down on you in shame.

[-] kittenzrulz123 2 points 13 hours ago

The only holy compiler I need is lord RMSs GCC

[-] Jsilverhand69@lemm.ee 2 points 13 hours ago

Everyone fucking knows that God loves elephants. Except this guy

[-] kittenzrulz123 15 points 23 hours ago

Agreed, OSS purity is silly. I am running an open source client (Thunder) to this open source service on my Pixel 9 running GraphineOS, the low level firmware is still absolutely proprietary.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
785 points (100.0% liked)

memes

12777 readers
2858 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS