Not sure what you mean with cybernetics but i have been working on a framework to move from the status quo of capital power to a needs based society where money is simply a measurement of global costs to build/consume something.

Its based on the awareness that modern money is just made up anyway. Banks can create new (fountainpen) money when they give out a new loan. This new money is then destroyed when its paid back. In theory that makes some sense but in reality old loans are refinanced with new ones to create an endless cycle with ever increasing deficits.

They need to do this because there is not enough money to run the entire economy in the modern age. Clearly comes from a mindset of their being a max quantity of money. And this limitation is not there for any purpose, its not connected to the ecological costs of our work it was inherited from a simpler time before we had machines that can do advanced maths for us.

Real numbers can go into the negative, and besides the fact you cant hold a negative quantity of something in your hand there is nothing mathematical wrong with that.

Profit = loss. When a company take a cut that is an extra costs for the global system.

So when i ever Finnish my manifesto, i propose to eventually allowing the numbers to go in zero.

When you consume or do something your still doing the math and counting it. But it wont matter you dont have enough of it.

When a factory costs x much to build than thats a measurement. It doesn’t require a profit stream to even out if we as a local society agree that this initial costs is worth the production.

Now this sound wild without the other details and tons of things need to happen before wel probably make that switch. But some spoilers.

Distribution centers shop at production based on the needs of the people they service. Production first looks to distribute in ratio of how many people each center serves. Then adjusts when actual demand is like to redirect a surpluss or in case if high demand repackage into smaller packages.

If a distribution center cant meet their local demand in any way they opt not to import or collect in storage till they do.

corporations right now can step into this system by doing what they are already doing except They count any loans aswell as profit as 2 measurements of economic loss.

In a transition there will be much double accounting, technically there the same numbers but as long as limited money exists we need to count everything both ways.

In transition it could start as a form of pension. Lower class old people cant waste more then billionaires are right now and we owe it to all human lives to spend their final years in dignity.

My system does not solve inequality, but makes it more transparent.

Neither does it guarantee a more self sufficient society but again it makes the costs of society transparent so we can move to a more self sufficient one.

I wasn’t ready to publicize this but i hope it answers your post.