78
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by nanoUFO@sh.itjust.works to c/games@sh.itjust.works

PC Specifications

MINIMUM:

OS: Windows 10 version 21H1 (10.0.19043)

Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 2600X, Intel Core i7-6800K

Memory: 16 GB RAM

Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 5700, NVIDIA GeForce 1070 Ti

DirectX: Version 12

Storage: 125 GB available space

Additional Notes: SSD Required

RECOMMENDED:

OS: Windows 10/11 with updates

Processor: AMD Ryzen 5 3600X, Intel i5-10600K

Memory: 16 GB RAM

Graphics: AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080

DirectX: Version 12

Network: Broadband Internet connection

Storage: 125 GB available space

Additional Notes: SSD Required

all 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BlinkAndItsGone@lemm.ee 30 points 1 year ago

The specs are exactly the same as the ones that have been up on the Steam page for weeks/months, in case someone was wondering if they'd changed.

[-] TastyWheat@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Only a 2080 for recommended specs? Do they know they're Bethesda?

[-] Hyperreality@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago

Do you?

This game will run fine on a 2080, by the time it's been fully patched and optimised by the modding community. Honestly, can't wait till 2025 when I'll be able to play the finished game.

[-] northendtrooper@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

That seems really low for recommended. Guess they really built it for consoles before PC.

[-] Patariki@feddit.nl 10 points 1 year ago

Starfield was originally planned to be released 2 years ago. But when Microsoft took over they gave Bethesda another 2 year development time, which they mainly used for polishing if you believe the talk about that. In that case it's not surprising that the requirements are more comparable to games of 2 years ago instead of current releases.

[-] Brazzburry@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Is ssd required even a thing? I mean sure it's faster but... Only?

[-] whataboutshutup@discuss.online 5 points 1 year ago

With the way they reused, dynamically loaded assets before and tried to keep world seamless, they'd probably load\unload parts of these 125 Gb a lot, with this 16 Gb RAM requirement no less. They test it with SSD and make it so it doesn't have microstutter and loading problems on their target machine. Or, god forbid, loading screens when walking outside, like it was in TES3; or TES4 banning levitation and loading complex cities as different locations that won't work in a space sim etc etc. BethSoft had many problems with it already. I doubt it'd refuse to work, but if they build their game around it, the result is unpredictable. Bet, it'd load low-res LOD textures and only then replace them with okay ones. That'd probably ruin the spaceship landing – one of the, possibly, most demanding and visually sweet parts of the game. It looking great is their baseline here.

[-] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It will likely still have loading times hidden behind unskippable animations. (See the door opening animation in the gameplay reveal.) You're going to need an SSD to make that work.

[-] whataboutshutup@discuss.online 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It could make a sci-fi thriller.

be me

a star traveler

opening a door

there's black hole

opening another

black hole

opening a fridge

yes, you guess it

black hole

[-] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

HDDs have been holding back what you can do in open worlds for a while. It (and the PS5 specifically having an extra emphasis on hardware decompression to amp it up further) was the thing I was most excited about for current gen consoles. There were a lot of rumors that PS4 Spider-Man had to cap web slinging speed to allow the HDD to keep up, and we'll see what the movement options are in Starfield and how ships work (unless we know already and I haven't seen it), but even the jet pack boost thing could seriously strain loads in denser areas if it allows enough movement to feel good in opener spaces.

[-] Call_Me_Maple@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Whelp, it looks like I'm going to be CPU bottlenecked.

[-] FracturedEel@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

I have an older i5... how do you find out what model it is without opening the case? Is it in system section in settings?

[-] Apex_Fail@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Device manager will tell you the generation and model

[-] Bye@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

They say 1070ti… will my 980ti run it??

Also I hope it runs on Linux

[-] Cavemanfreak@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

Someone said that those specs are for 1440p, so I still have hope that my 1060 6GB can handle it at 1080p.

[-] narc0tic_bird@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

A 1070 Ti is quite a bit faster than a 980 Ti. It also has 2 GB more VRAM. So hard to say how well a 980 Ti would run Starfield.

[-] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's the part that they always leave out 😡

this post was submitted on 25 Aug 2023
78 points (100.0% liked)

Games

16729 readers
437 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS